Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Comment on "Superfluid Turbulence from Quantum Kelvin Wave to Classical Kolmogorov Cascades"

Jeffrey Yepez, George Vahala, Linda L. Vahala, Min Soe

Published Jan 1, 2010• 2 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Classical Vs. Superfluid Turbulence

P.-E. Roche

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Nov 23, 2008•0 citations

Comment on “Superfluid Turbulence from Quantum Kelvin Wave to Classical Kolmogorov Cascades”

Giorgio Krstulovic, Marc Brächet

In this comment we point out that the high wavenumber $k^{-3}$ power-law observed by the PRL, [v. 103, 084501 (2009) by J. Yepez, G. Vahala, L.Vahala and M. Soe, arXiv:0905.0159] is an artifact stemming from the definition of the kinetic energy spectra and is thus not directly related to a Kelvin wave cascade. We also clarify a confusion about the wavenumber intervals on which Kolmogorov and Kelvin wave cascades are expected to take place.

arXiv:0911.1749•Physical Review Letters•Sep 13, 2010•16 citations

On Developed Superfluid Turbulence

Григорий Ефимович Воловик

arXiv:cond-mat/0402035•Journal of Low Temperature Physics•Sep 1, 2004•28 citations

Comment on "Superfluid turbulence from quantum Kelvin wave to classical Kolmogorov cascades" [arXiv:0905.0159] by J. Yepez, G. Vahala, L.Vahala and M. Soe

Victor S. L’vov, Sergey Nazarenko

Both the Kelvin wave and the Kolmogorov turbulence interpretations presented in the PRL, [v. 103, 084501 (2009) by J. Yepez, G. Vahala, L.Vahala and M. Soe, arXiv:0905.0159] are misleading, and much more theoretical analysis needs to be done for the interpretation of the important numerical results obtained by the authors. A way to do this is suggested.

arXiv:0909.2936•Sep 16, 2009•0 citations

Comment on “Superfluid Turbulence from Quantum Kelvin Wave to Classical Kolmogorov Cascades”

Victor S. L’vov, Sergey Nazarenko

A Comment on the Letter by Jeffrey Yepez et al. [Phys Rev. Lett. 103, 084501 (2009)].Received 16 September 2009DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.219401©2010 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•May 25, 2010•5 citations

Quantum turbulence in superfluids

J. J. Hosio, V. B. Eltsov, R. de Graaf +2 more

•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations
In this comment we point out that the high wavenumber k−3k^{-3}k−3 power-law observed by the PRL, [v. 103, 084501 (2009) by J. Yepez, G. Vahala, L.Vahala and M. Soe, arXiv:0905.0159] is an artifact stemming from the definition of the kinetic energy spectra and is thus not directly related to a Kelvin wave cascade. We also clarify a confusion about the wavenumber intervals on which Kolmogorov and Kelvin wave cascades are expected to take place.