Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Aharonov-Bohm Effect Without Gauge Fields - A Paradox

Igor R. Klebanov, Leonard Susskind

Published Mar 1, 1991• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789814439251_0003

Related papers

Gauge Fields, Electromagnetism and the Bohm-Aharonov Effect

Chen Ning Yang

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Apr 30, 2013•6 citations

Gauge Fields, Electromagnetism and the Bohm-Aharonov Effect

Chen Ning Yang

Advanced series in applied physics•Jan 1, 1997•1 citation

Phase (or gauge) invariance and new field-free Aharonov-Bohm effects

Gianfranco Spavieri

The European Physical Journal D•Dec 12, 2005•16 citations

Feynman’s Relativistic Electrodynamics Paradox and the Aharonov-Bohm Effect

Adam Caprez, Herman Batelaan

Foundations of Physics•Feb 14, 2009•8 citations

Revisiting Modular Momentum in the Aharonov-Bohm Effect: A Resolution of Aharonov’s Paradox

Gao, Shan

The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect demonstrates that electromagnetic potentials can influence quantum systems in field-free regions, challenging classical intuitions. In 2004, Aharonov and Kaufherr proposed that the AB phase shift arises from a nonlocal exchange of modular momentum, a gauge-invariant quantity, occurring at a definite time before wave packet interference. This framework, however, introduces a paradox: the expectation value of the modular momentum operator, $\langle \hat{M}_y \rangle$, changes abruptly when the electron’s wave packets cross the solenoid, yet local, gauge-invariant properties of the electron, such as its velocity distribution, remain continuous. We resolve this paradox by showing that $\hat{M}_y=\exp(i \frac{m v_y L}{\hbar})$ and the velocity operator $\hat{v}_y$ have distinct spectral measures, and the abrupt change in $\langle \hat{M}_y \rangle$ reflects a global topological change in the electromagnetic environment, not a dynamical alteration in the electron’s state. Through a corrected, gauge-invariant formulation, we demonstrate that $\langle \hat{M}_y \rangle$ encodes the AB phase but does not explain the AB effect’s mechanism. This resolution reaffirms the conventional explanation of the AB effect while clarifying the nonlocal nature and experimental limitations of modular momentum.

•Sep 10, 2025•0 citations

Non-Abelian Aharonov–Bohm effect with the time-dependent gauge fields

Seyed Ali Hosseini Mansoori, Behrouz Mirza

We investigate the non-Abelian Aharonov–Bohm (AB) effect for time-dependent gauge fields. We prove that the non-Abelian AB phase shift related to time-dependent gauge fields, in which the electric and magnetic fields are written in the adjoint representation of SU(N) generators, vanishes up to the first order expansion of the phase factor. Therefore, the flux quantization in a superconductor ring does not appear in the time-dependent Abelian or non-Abelian AB effect.

arXiv:1601.08164•Physics Letters B•Feb 4, 2016•7 citations
The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect demonstrates that electromagnetic potentials can influence quantum systems in field-free regions, challenging classical intuitions. In 2004, Aharonov and Kaufherr proposed that the AB phase shift arises from a nonlocal exchange of modular momentum, a gauge-invariant quantity, occurring at a definite time before wave packet interference. This framework, however, introduces a paradox: the expectation value of the modular momentum operator, ⟨M^y⟩\langle \hat{M}_y \rangle⟨M^y​⟩, changes abruptly when the electron’s wave packets cross the solenoid, yet local, gauge-invariant properties of the electron, such as its velocity distribution, remain continuous. We resolve this paradox by showing that M^y=exp⁡(imvyLℏ)\hat{M}_y=\exp(i \frac{m v_y L}{\hbar})M^y​=exp(iℏmvy​L​) and the velocity operator v^y\hat{v}_yv^y​ have distinct spectral measures, and the abrupt change in ⟨M^y⟩\langle \hat{M}_y \rangle⟨M^y​⟩ reflects a global topological change in the electromagnetic environment, not a dynamical alteration in the electron’s state. Through a corrected, gauge-invariant formulation, we demonstrate that ⟨M^y⟩\langle \hat{M}_y \rangle⟨M^y​⟩ encodes the AB phase but does not explain the AB effect’s mechanism. This resolution reaffirms the conventional explanation of the AB effect while clarifying the nonlocal nature and experimental limitations of modular momentum.