Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Mathematical and Computational Applications

Biquaternionic Description of the Schrödinger Equation

Murat Tanışlı, Süleyman Demi̇r

Published Aug 1, 2012• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This paper begins with the introduction of biquaternion algebra and its properties in compact, profound and comprehensible approach. The Schrödinger equation including both the scalar Aharonov-Bohm(sAB) and Aharonov-Casher(AC) effects, that are currently popular in particle physics and condensed-matter physics, has been re-written by biquaternions. The newly biquaternionic Schrödinger equation, which is defined with various assumptions and approaches, also includes the biquaternionic generalized momentum in Hamiltonian.

DOI
10.3390/mca17020176

Related papers

THE AHARONOV–CASHER SCATTERING: THE EFFECT OF THE ∇ · E TERM

E. AL-QAQ, M. S. Shikakhwa

In the Aharonov–Casher (AC) scattering, a neutral particle interacts with an infinitesimally thin, long charge filament resulting in a phase shift. In the original AC treatment, a ∇ · E term proportional to the charge density at the filament's position is dropped from the Hamiltonian on the basis that the particle is banned from the filament, thus, the resulting Hamiltonian compares with the Aharonov–Bohm Hamiltonian of a scalar particle. Here, we consider AC scattering with this term included. Starting from the three-dimensional nonrelativistic Aharonov–Casher (AC) Schrödinger equation with the ∇ · E term included, we find the wave functions — in particular their singular component — the phase shifts and thus compute the scattering amplitudes and cross-sections. We show that singular solutions in the AC case appear only when the delta function interaction introduced is attractive regardless of the spin orientation of the particle. We find that the inclusion of this term does not introduce a structural difference in the general form of the cross-section even for polarized particles. Its mere effect, is in shifting the parameter N (the greatest integer in α) that appears in the cross-section, in the attractive case, by one. Interesting situation appears when N = 0, thus α=δ, in the case α≻0, and N = -1, so α = 1-δ in the case α≺0: At these values of the parameter N, where αis just any fraction, the cross-section for a particle polarized in the scattering plane to scatter in a state with the same polarization, is isotropic. It also vanishes, at these values of N, for transitions between same-helicity eigenstates. For these values of the parameter N and at the special values α = ±1/2, the cross-sections for both signs of α coincide. The main differences between this model and the "mathematically equivalent" spin-1/2 AB theory are outlined.

Modern Physics Letters A•Jun 4, 2010•1 citation

The Schrödinger equation

Kenichi Konishi, Giampiero Paffuti

Abstract In quantum mechanics the dynamics is described by the Schrödinger equation. We first discuss the general properties of the Schrödinger equation and then proceed to illustrate how the quantum mechanical laws introduced in the previous chapter work in concrete physical situations. Both the bound-state problems and scattering processes are analyzed, mainly through various examples of one-dimensional systems.

•Mar 5, 2009•1 citation

The Various Versions of Quantum Mechanics

F. J. Duarte

The Schrödinger equation is a beautiful wave equation that leads us directly to the widely used Hamiltonians in quantum mechanics. The Schrödinger equation was also there at the very beginning of quantum mechanics. Therefore it should not be surprising that when most people refer to quantum mechanics they do so from the vantage point of the Schrödinger equation. However, there are also several other versions of quantum mechanics. Most notable is the version of quantum mechanics introduced by Heisenberg that was transformed into a matrix formalism via a collaborative effort of Born, Heisenberg, and Jordan. Then around came our favorite, Dirac's bra ket notation. Dirac also inspired Feynman to introduce his path integrals. But there are also others. A brief description follows.

CRC Press eBooks•Apr 10, 2026•0 citations

Topology, Locality, and Aharonov-Bohm Effect with Neutrons

M. Peshkin, Harry J. Lipkin

Recent neutron interferometry experiments have been interpreted as demonstrating a new topological phenomenon similar in principle to the usual Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, but with the neutron's magnetic moment replacing the electron's charge. We show that he new phenomenon, called scalar AB (SAB) effect, follows from an ordinary local interaction, contrary to the usual AB effect, and we argue that the SAB effect is not a topological effect by any useful definition. We find that SAB actually measures an apparently novel spin autocorrelation whose operator equations of motion contain the local torque in the magnetic field. We note that the same remarks apply to the Aharonov-Casher effect.

arXiv:quant-ph/9501012•Physical Review Letters•Apr 10, 1995•81 citations

Relativistic Schrödinger Equations and the Bohm-Aharonov Effect

Margarete Mattes, M. Sorg

The theory of Relativistic Schrödinger Equations offers a local-realistic interpretation for the Bohm-Aharonov effect. The wave function ψ( x ) is built up by a (scalar) localization field l ( x ) and a kinetic (vector) field k µ ( x ), which extends far beyond the support of l ( x ) and thus transfers electromagnetic effects from far away to the location of the wave packet.

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•Jul 15, 1994•6 citations

TOWARDS A MEANINGFUL INTRODUCTION TO THE SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION THROUGH HISTORICAL AND HEURISTIC APPROACHES

Georgios R. Tsaparlis

The Schrödinger equation is the foundation of quantum mechanics and the starting point for any improvement to the description of submicroscopic physical and chemical systems. Although it cannot be proved or derived strictly, it has associated with it various formulations and ‘derivations’. In this work, we study the physical and mathematical evidence that make the Schrödinger equation plausible. First, we make an approach from the historical perspective, and study the methods of the pioneers Schrödinger, Heisenberg, and Dirac. Turning to modern treatments, we review numerous heuristic introductions to quantum mechanics and make a synthesis of the various methods into a coherent and meaningful whole. [Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. Eur.: 2001, 2, 203-213]

Chemistry Education Research and Practice•Jan 1, 2001•16 citations
This paper begins with the introduction of biquaternion algebra and its properties in compact, profound and comprehensible approach. The Schrödinger equation including both the scalar Aharonov-Bohm(sAB) and Aharonov-Casher(AC) effects, that are currently popular in particle physics and condensed-matter physics, has been re-written by biquaternions. The newly biquaternionic Schrödinger equation, which is defined with various assumptions and approaches, also includes the biquaternionic generalized momentum in Hamiltonian.
In the Aharonov–Casher (AC) scattering, a neutral particle interacts with an infinitesimally thin, long charge filament resulting in a phase shift. In the original AC treatment, a ∇ · E term proportional to the charge density at the filament's position is dropped from the Hamiltonian on the basis that the particle is banned from the filament, thus, the resulting Hamiltonian compares with the Aharonov–Bohm Hamiltonian of a scalar particle. Here, we consider AC scattering with this term included. Starting from the three-dimensional nonrelativistic Aharonov–Casher (AC) Schrödinger equation with the ∇ · E term included, we find the wave functions — in particular their singular component — the phase shifts and thus compute the scattering amplitudes and cross-sections. We show that singular solutions in the AC case appear only when the delta function interaction introduced is attractive regardless of the spin orientation of the particle. We find that the inclusion of this term does not introduce a structural difference in the general form of the cross-section even for polarized particles. Its mere effect, is in shifting the parameter N (the greatest integer in α) that appears in the cross-section, in the attractive case, by one. Interesting situation appears when N = 0, thus α=δ, in the case α≻0, and N = -1, so α = 1-δ in the case α≺0: At these values of the parameter N, where αis just any fraction, the cross-section for a particle polarized in the scattering plane to scatter in a state with the same polarization, is isotropic. It also vanishes, at these values of N, for transitions between same-helicity eigenstates. For these values of the parameter N and at the special values α = ±1/2, the cross-sections for both signs of α coincide. The main differences between this model and the "mathematically equivalent" spin-1/2 AB theory are outlined.
The Schrödinger equation is a beautiful wave equation that leads us directly to the widely used Hamiltonians in quantum mechanics. The Schrödinger equation was also there at the very beginning of quantum mechanics. Therefore it should not be surprising that when most people refer to quantum mechanics they do so from the vantage point of the Schrödinger equation. However, there are also several other versions of quantum mechanics. Most notable is the version of quantum mechanics introduced by Heisenberg that was transformed into a matrix formalism via a collaborative effort of Born, Heisenberg, and Jordan. Then around came our favorite, Dirac's bra ket notation. Dirac also inspired Feynman to introduce his path integrals. But there are also others. A brief description follows.
Recent neutron interferometry experiments have been interpreted as demonstrating a new topological phenomenon similar in principle to the usual Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, but with the neutron's magnetic moment replacing the electron's charge. We show that he new phenomenon, called scalar AB (SAB) effect, follows from an ordinary local interaction, contrary to the usual AB effect, and we argue that the SAB effect is not a topological effect by any useful definition. We find that SAB actually measures an apparently novel spin autocorrelation whose operator equations of motion contain the local torque in the magnetic field. We note that the same remarks apply to the Aharonov-Casher effect.
The Schrödinger equation is the foundation of quantum mechanics and the starting point for any improvement to the description of submicroscopic physical and chemical systems. Although it cannot be proved or derived strictly, it has associated with it various formulations and ‘derivations’. In this work, we study the physical and mathematical evidence that make the Schrödinger equation plausible. First, we make an approach from the historical perspective, and study the methods of the pioneers Schrödinger, Heisenberg, and Dirac. Turning to modern treatments, we review numerous heuristic introductions to quantum mechanics and make a synthesis of the various methods into a coherent and meaningful whole. [Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. Eur.: 2001, 2, 203-213]