Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Observation of SubPoisson Franck-Hertz Light at 253.7 nm

Malvin Carl Teich, Bahaa E. A. Saleh, Todd S. Larchuk

Published Jun 18, 1984• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Antibunched and sub-Poisson light from the Franck-Hertz experiment (A)

Malvin Carl Teich, Bahaa E. A. Saleh

Journal of the Optical Society of America A•Jan 1, 1983•2 citations

Comment on the Franck–Hertz experiment

Jay S. Huebner

American Journal of Physics•Mar 1, 1976•4 citations

NEW EMISSION SOURCE WITH SUBPOISSON PHOTON STATISTICS

А. В. Белинский, A. S. Chirkin

•Jan 1, 1989•0 citations

A Franck and Hertz critical potential experiment

James Sanders

Proceedings of the Physical Society•Nov 1, 1945•0 citations

Antibunching in the Franck-Hertz experiment

Malvin Carl Teich, Bahaa E. A. Saleh, David Stoler

Optics Communications•Jul 1, 1983•46 citations

Observation of sub-Poisson Franck–Hertz light at 2537 nm

Malvin Carl Teich, Bahaa E. A. Saleh

We report the generation of ultraviolet (253.7-nm) sub-Poisson light from Hg vapor excited by inelastic collisions with a space-charge-limited (quiet) electron beam. This first stationary sub-Poisson light source is only weakly so, with a Fano factor that is between two and three standard deviations below that for Poisson light. This is principally because of optical losses in the experimental apparatus. There does not appear to be any fundamental limit that impedes the techniques from being used to produce an intense cw light source that is also arbitrarily sub-Poisson.

Journal of the Optical Society of America B•Feb 1, 1985•146 citations
We report the generation of ultraviolet (253.7-nm) sub-Poisson light from Hg vapor excited by inelastic collisions with a space-charge-limited (quiet) electron beam. This first stationary sub-Poisson light source is only weakly so, with a Fano factor that is between two and three standard deviations below that for Poisson light. This is principally because of optical losses in the experimental apparatus. There does not appear to be any fundamental limit that impedes the techniques from being used to produce an intense cw light source that is also arbitrarily sub-Poisson.