Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Measuring time-energy resources for quantum processes

Fch Fung, HF Chau

Published Jan 1, 2013• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

The speed of any quantum process is limited by quantum mechanics via time-energy uncertainty relations and they imply that time and energy are tradeoff with each other. As such, we propose to measure the time-energy as a single unit for quantum channels. We consider a time-energy measure for quantum channels and compute lower and upper bounds of it using the channel Kraus operators. For a special class of channels (which includes the depolarizing channel), we obtain the exact value of the timeenergy measure. Our result can be used to compare the time-energy resources of similar quantum processes. In particular, we show that erasing quantum information requires √ (n+ 1)/n times more time-energy resource than erasing classical information, where n is the system dimension. This work is published in [1].

Related papers

Time-energy measure for quantum processes

Chi‐Hang Fred Fung, H. F. Chau

Quantum mechanics sets limits on how fast quantum processes can run given some system energy through time-energy uncertainty relations, and they imply that time and energy are tradeoffs against each other. Thus, we propose to measure the time energy as a single unit for quantum channels. We consider a time-energy measure for quantum channels and compute lower and upper bounds of it using the channel Kraus operators. For a special class of channels (which includes the depolarizing channel), we can obtain the exact value of the time-energy measure. One consequence of our result is that erasing quantum information requires $\sqrt{(n+1)/n}$ times more time-energy resource than erasing classical information, where $n$ is the system dimension.

arXiv:1305.5776•Physical Review A•Jul 9, 2013•16 citations

Solution to time-energy costs of quantum channels

Chi‐Hang Fred Fung, H. F. Chau, Chi-Kwong Li +1 more

We derive a formula for the time-energy costs of general quantum channels proposed in [Phys. Rev. A 88, 012307 (2013)]. This formula allows us to numerically find the time-energy cost of any quantum channel using positive semidefinite programming. We also derive a lower bound to the time-energy cost for any channels and the exact the time-energy cost for a class of channels which includes the qudit depolarizing channels and projector channels as special cases.

arXiv:1404.4134•Apr 16, 2014•0 citations

Solution to time-energy costs of quantum channels

Chi‐Hang Fred Fung, H. F. Chau, Chi-Kwong Li +1 more

We derive a formula for the time-energy costs of general quantum channels proposed in [Phys. Rev. A {\bf 88}, 012307 (2013)]. This formula allows us to numerically find the time-energy cost of any quantum channel using positive semidefinite programming. We also derive a lower bound to the time-energy cost for any channels and the exact the time-energy cost for a class of channels which includes the qudit depolarizing channels and projector channels as special cases.

Quantum Information and Computation•May 1, 2015•3 citations

Time-energy costs of quantum measurements

Chi‐Hang Fred Fung, H. F. Chau

Time and energy of quantum processes are a tradeoff against each other. We propose to ascribe to any given quantum process a time-energy cost to quantify how much computation it performs. Here, we analyze the time-energy costs for general quantum measurements, along a similar line as our previous work for quantum channels, and prove exact and lower bound formulas for the costs. We use these formulas to evaluate the efficiencies of actual measurement implementations. We find that one implementation for a Bell measurement is optimal in time energy. We also analyze the time-energy cost for unambiguous state discrimination and find evidence that only a finite time-energy cost is needed to distinguish any number of states.

arXiv:1402.5025•Physical Review A•May 8, 2014•3 citations

A class of time-energy uncertainty relations for time-dependent Hamiltonians

Tien D. Kieu

A new class of time-energy uncertainty relations is directly derived from the Schrödinger equations for time-dependent Hamiltonians. Only the initial states and the Hamiltonians, but neither the instantaneous eigenstates nor the full time-dependent wave funct- ions, which would demand a full solution for a time-dependent Hamiltonian, are required for our time-energy relations. Explicit results are then presented for particular subcases of interest for time-independent Hamiltonians and also for time-varying Hamiltonians employed in adiabatic quantum computation. Some estimates of the lower bounds on computational time are given for general adiabatic quantum algorithms, with Grover's search as an illustration. We particularly emphasize the role of required energy resources, besides the space and time complexity, for the physical process of (quantum) computation, in general.

arXiv:1702.00603•Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Jun 1, 2019•12 citations

Universal Lower Bound on Quantum Measurement Timescales

Robin Bisht

The quantum measurement problem the tension between unitary Schrödinger evolution and the projection postulate has been with us since the early days of quantum theory. Here we derive a lower bound on the time required for any quantum measurement, treating the measurement as quantum channel discrimination carried out by the environment. The resulting bound, \tau_{\mathcal{M}} \ge \frac{\ln N}{2\pi\gamma}, relates the measurement time \tau_{\mathcal{M}} to the number of distinguishable outcomes N and the system-environment coupling strength \gamma. It follows from combining a finite channel-capacity limit on information transfer with the thermodynamic cost of erasing information, as set by Landauer's principle. The bound explains why measurements look instantaneous at macroscopic scales while still being bounded away from zero, gives a timescale for the onset of classical objectivity under quantum Darwinism, and yields concrete, testable predictions for weak-measurement experiments in cavity quantum electrodynamics and superconducting circuits.

•Jun 16, 2026•0 citations
The speed of any quantum process is limited by quantum mechanics via time-energy uncertainty relations and they imply that time and energy are tradeoff with each other. As such, we propose to measure the time-energy as a single unit for quantum channels. We consider a time-energy measure for quantum channels and compute lower and upper bounds of it using the channel Kraus operators. For a special class of channels (which includes the depolarizing channel), we obtain the exact value of the timeenergy measure. Our result can be used to compare the time-energy resources of similar quantum processes. In particular, we show that erasing quantum information requires √ (n+ 1)/n times more time-energy resource than erasing classical information, where n is the system dimension. This work is published in [1].
Quantum mechanics sets limits on how fast quantum processes can run given some system energy through time-energy uncertainty relations, and they imply that time and energy are tradeoffs against each other. Thus, we propose to measure the time energy as a single unit for quantum channels. We consider a time-energy measure for quantum channels and compute lower and upper bounds of it using the channel Kraus operators. For a special class of channels (which includes the depolarizing channel), we can obtain the exact value of the time-energy measure. One consequence of our result is that erasing quantum information requires (n+1)/n\sqrt{(n+1)/n}(n+1)/n​ times more time-energy resource than erasing classical information, where nnn is the system dimension.
Time and energy of quantum processes are a tradeoff against each other. We propose to ascribe to any given quantum process a time-energy cost to quantify how much computation it performs. Here, we analyze the time-energy costs for general quantum measurements, along a similar line as our previous work for quantum channels, and prove exact and lower bound formulas for the costs. We use these formulas to evaluate the efficiencies of actual measurement implementations. We find that one implementation for a Bell measurement is optimal in time energy. We also analyze the time-energy cost for unambiguous state discrimination and find evidence that only a finite time-energy cost is needed to distinguish any number of states.
A new class of time-energy uncertainty relations is directly derived from the Schrödinger equations for time-dependent Hamiltonians. Only the initial states and the Hamiltonians, but neither the instantaneous eigenstates nor the full time-dependent wave funct- ions, which would demand a full solution for a time-dependent Hamiltonian, are required for our time-energy relations. Explicit results are then presented for particular subcases of interest for time-independent Hamiltonians and also for time-varying Hamiltonians employed in adiabatic quantum computation. Some estimates of the lower bounds on computational time are given for general adiabatic quantum algorithms, with Grover's search as an illustration. We particularly emphasize the role of required energy resources, besides the space and time complexity, for the physical process of (quantum) computation, in general.
The quantum measurement problem the tension between unitary Schrödinger evolution and the projection postulate has been with us since the early days of quantum theory. Here we derive a lower bound on the time required for any quantum measurement, treating the measurement as quantum channel discrimination carried out by the environment. The resulting bound, \tau_{\mathcal{M}} \ge \frac{\ln N}{2\pi\gamma}, relates the measurement time \tau_{\mathcal{M}} to the number of distinguishable outcomes N and the system-environment coupling strength \gamma. It follows from combining a finite channel-capacity limit on information transfer with the thermodynamic cost of erasing information, as set by Landauer's principle. The bound explains why measurements look instantaneous at macroscopic scales while still being bounded away from zero, gives a timescale for the onset of classical objectivity under quantum Darwinism, and yields concrete, testable predictions for weak-measurement experiments in cavity quantum electrodynamics and superconducting circuits.