Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Information Rates for Secret Sharing over Various Access Structures.

Jessica Ruth Metcalf-Burton

Published Jan 1, 2009• 2 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Many open questions in secret sharing ask about the information rate of a particular access structure or class of access structures. Here we improve the best known upper bounds on the information rates of the access structures induced by the Vamos matroid from 10/11 to 8/9 for V1 and from 9/10 to 17/19 for V6. The method we introduce to obtain the bound for V6 can be generalized and applied to all other known 4-variable non-Shannon information inequalities. We also find the exact information rates for the infinitely many minor-minimal, non-matroid-related access structures whose rates were not previously known. On the topic of information inequalities, we show that the Ingleton inequality holds under certain independence assumptions and use this formulation to get a new proof of the Zhang-Yeung non-Shannon inequality.

Related papers

Secret Sharing and Non-Shannon Information Inequalities

Amos Beimel, Ilan Orlov

The known secret-sharing schemes for most access structures are not efficient; even for a one-bit secret the length of the shares in the schemes is 2O(n), wherenis the number of participants in the access structure. It is a long standing open problem to improve these schemes or prove that they cannot be improved. The best known lower bound is by Csirmaz, who proved that there exist access structures withnparticipants such that the size of the share of at least one party isn/logntimes the secret size. Csirmaz's proof uses Shannon information inequalities, which were the only information inequalities known when Csirmaz published his result. On the negative side, Csirmaz proved that by only using Shannon information inequalities one cannot prove a lower bound of ω(n) on the share size. In the last decade, a sequence of non-Shannon information inequalities were discovered. In fact, it was proved that there are infinity many independent information inequalities even in four variables. This raises the hope that these inequalities can help in improving the lower bounds beyondn. However, we show that any information inequality with four or five variables cannot prove a lower bound of ω(n) on the share size. In addition, we show that the same negative result holds for all information inequalities with more than five variables that are known to date.

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Sep 1, 2011•30 citations

Finding Lower Bounds on the Complexity of Secret Sharing Schemes by Linear Programming.

Carles Padró, Leonor Vázquez, Yang An

Optimizing the maximum, or average, length of the shares in relation to the length of the secret for every given access structure is a difficult and long-standing open problem in cryptology. Most of the known lower bounds on these parameters have been obtained by implicitly or explicitly using that every secret sharing scheme defines a polymatroid related to the access structure. The best bounds that can be obtained by this combinatorial method can be determined by using linear programming, and this can be effectively done for access structures on a small number of participants. By applying this linear programming approach, we improve some of the known lower bounds for the access structures on five participants and the graph access structures on six participants for which these parameters were still undetermined. Nevertheless, the lower bounds that are obtained by this combinatorial method are not tight in general. For some access structures, they can be improved by adding to the linear program non-Shannon information inequalities as new constraints. We obtain in this way new separation results for some graph access structures on eight participants and for some ports of non-representable matroids. Finally, we prove that, for two access structures on five participants, the combinatorial lower bound cannot be attained by any linear secret sharing scheme.

•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

Improving the Linear Programming Technique in the Search for Lower Bounds in Secret Sharing

Oriol Farràs, Tarik Kaced, Sebastià Martín Mollevi +1 more

We present a new improvement in the linear programming technique to derive lower bounds on the information ratio of secret sharing schemes. We obtain non-Shannon-type bounds without using information inequalities explicitly. Our new technique makes it possible to determine the optimal information ratio of linear secret sharing schemes for all access structures on 5 participants and all graph-based access structures on 6 participants. In addition, new lower bounds are presented also for some small matroid ports and, in particular, the optimal information ratios of the linear secret sharing schemes for the ports of the Vamos matroid are determined.

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Jun 29, 2020•16 citations

How to Use Undiscovered Information Inequalities: Direct Applications of the Copy Lemma

Emirhan Gürpınar, Andrei Romashchenko

We discuss linear programming techniques that help to deduce corollaries of non-classical inequalities for Shannon's entropy. We focus on direct applications of the copy lemma. These applications involve implicitly some (known or unknown) non-classical universal inequalities for Shannon's entropy, though we do not derive these inequalities explicitly. To reduce the computational complexity of these problems, we extensively use symmetry considerations. We present two examples of use of these techniques: we provide a reduced size formal inference of the best known bound for the Ingleton score (originally proven by Dougherty et al. with explicitly derived non-Shannon type inequalities), and improve the lower bound for the optimal information ratio of the secret sharing scheme for an access structure based on the Vámos matroid.

arXiv:1901.07476•IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Jul 1, 2019•19 citations

NEW METHOD TO COMPUTE BOUNDS ON THE OPTIMAL INFORMATION RATE OF SECRET SHARING SCHEMES

Abbas Cheraghi

In a bipartite secret sharing scheme, the set of participants is divided into two parts, and all participants in each part play an equivalent role. The ideal bipartite access structures were characterized by Padr´o and S´aez, but it is not known which is the optimal information rate of non ideal bipartite access structures. Determining the optimal information rate of general access structures is one of the major problems in secret sharing. We study this open problem restricted to the bipartite access structures, obtaining a new method to compute bounds on the optimal information rate. Namely, by using the connection between secret sharing schemes and polymatroids, we show a linear programming problem that determines, for each access structure, an upper bound on the information rate. Moreover, we show new optimal constructions for certain bipartite access structures.

Facta Universitatis Series Mathematics and Informatics•Nov 21, 2025•0 citations

On Matroids and Nonideal Secret Sharing

Amos Beimel, Noam Livne

Secret-sharing schemes are a tool used in many cryptographic protocols. In these schemes, a dealer holding a secret string distributes shares to the parties such that only authorized subsets of participants can reconstruct the secret from their shares. The collection of authorized sets is called an access structure. An access structure is ideal if there is a secret-sharing scheme realizing it such that the shares are taken from the same domain as the secrets. Brickell and Davenport (Journal of Cryptology, 1991) have shown that ideal access structures are closely related to matroids. They give a necessary condition for an access structure to be ideal-the access structure must be induced by a matroid. Seymour (Journal of Combinatorial Theory B, 1992) has proved that the necessary condition is not sufficient: There exists an access structure induced by a matroid that does not have an ideal scheme. The research on access structures induced by matroids is continued in this work. The main result in this paper is strengthening the result of Seymour. It is shown that in any secret-sharing scheme realizing the access structure induced by the Vamos matroid with domain of the secrets of size k, the size of the domain of the shares is at least k + Omega(radic(k)). The second result considers nonideal secret-sharing schemes realizing access structures induced by matroids. It is proved that the fact that an access structure is induced by a matroid implies lower and upper bounds on the size of the domain of shares of subsets of participants even in nonideal schemes (as long as the shares are still relatively short). This generalized results of Brickell and Davenport for ideal schemes. Finally, an example of a nonideal access structure that is nearly ideal is presented.

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•May 29, 2008•15 citations
Many open questions in secret sharing ask about the information rate of a particular access structure or class of access structures. Here we improve the best known upper bounds on the information rates of the access structures induced by the Vamos matroid from 10/11 to 8/9 for V1 and from 9/10 to 17/19 for V6. The method we introduce to obtain the bound for V6 can be generalized and applied to all other known 4-variable non-Shannon information inequalities. We also find the exact information rates for the infinitely many minor-minimal, non-matroid-related access structures whose rates were not previously known. On the topic of information inequalities, we show that the Ingleton inequality holds under certain independence assumptions and use this formulation to get a new proof of the Zhang-Yeung non-Shannon inequality.
The known secret-sharing schemes for most access structures are not efficient; even for a one-bit secret the length of the shares in the schemes is 2O(n), wherenis the number of participants in the access structure. It is a long standing open problem to improve these schemes or prove that they cannot be improved. The best known lower bound is by Csirmaz, who proved that there exist access structures withnparticipants such that the size of the share of at least one party isn/logntimes the secret size. Csirmaz's proof uses Shannon information inequalities, which were the only information inequalities known when Csirmaz published his result. On the negative side, Csirmaz proved that by only using Shannon information inequalities one cannot prove a lower bound of ω(n) on the share size. In the last decade, a sequence of non-Shannon information inequalities were discovered. In fact, it was proved that there are infinity many independent information inequalities even in four variables. This raises the hope that these inequalities can help in improving the lower bounds beyondn. However, we show that any information inequality with four or five variables cannot prove a lower bound of ω(n) on the share size. In addition, we show that the same negative result holds for all information inequalities with more than five variables that are known to date.
Optimizing the maximum, or average, length of the shares in relation to the length of the secret for every given access structure is a difficult and long-standing open problem in cryptology. Most of the known lower bounds on these parameters have been obtained by implicitly or explicitly using that every secret sharing scheme defines a polymatroid related to the access structure. The best bounds that can be obtained by this combinatorial method can be determined by using linear programming, and this can be effectively done for access structures on a small number of participants. By applying this linear programming approach, we improve some of the known lower bounds for the access structures on five participants and the graph access structures on six participants for which these parameters were still undetermined. Nevertheless, the lower bounds that are obtained by this combinatorial method are not tight in general. For some access structures, they can be improved by adding to the linear program non-Shannon information inequalities as new constraints. We obtain in this way new separation results for some graph access structures on eight participants and for some ports of non-representable matroids. Finally, we prove that, for two access structures on five participants, the combinatorial lower bound cannot be attained by any linear secret sharing scheme.
We present a new improvement in the linear programming technique to derive lower bounds on the information ratio of secret sharing schemes. We obtain non-Shannon-type bounds without using information inequalities explicitly. Our new technique makes it possible to determine the optimal information ratio of linear secret sharing schemes for all access structures on 5 participants and all graph-based access structures on 6 participants. In addition, new lower bounds are presented also for some small matroid ports and, in particular, the optimal information ratios of the linear secret sharing schemes for the ports of the Vamos matroid are determined.
We discuss linear programming techniques that help to deduce corollaries of non-classical inequalities for Shannon's entropy. We focus on direct applications of the copy lemma. These applications involve implicitly some (known or unknown) non-classical universal inequalities for Shannon's entropy, though we do not derive these inequalities explicitly. To reduce the computational complexity of these problems, we extensively use symmetry considerations. We present two examples of use of these techniques: we provide a reduced size formal inference of the best known bound for the Ingleton score (originally proven by Dougherty et al. with explicitly derived non-Shannon type inequalities), and improve the lower bound for the optimal information ratio of the secret sharing scheme for an access structure based on the Vámos matroid.
In a bipartite secret sharing scheme, the set of participants is divided into two parts, and all participants in each part play an equivalent role. The ideal bipartite access structures were characterized by Padr´o and S´aez, but it is not known which is the optimal information rate of non ideal bipartite access structures. Determining the optimal information rate of general access structures is one of the major problems in secret sharing. We study this open problem restricted to the bipartite access structures, obtaining a new method to compute bounds on the optimal information rate. Namely, by using the connection between secret sharing schemes and polymatroids, we show a linear programming problem that determines, for each access structure, an upper bound on the information rate. Moreover, we show new optimal constructions for certain bipartite access structures.
Secret-sharing schemes are a tool used in many cryptographic protocols. In these schemes, a dealer holding a secret string distributes shares to the parties such that only authorized subsets of participants can reconstruct the secret from their shares. The collection of authorized sets is called an access structure. An access structure is ideal if there is a secret-sharing scheme realizing it such that the shares are taken from the same domain as the secrets. Brickell and Davenport (Journal of Cryptology, 1991) have shown that ideal access structures are closely related to matroids. They give a necessary condition for an access structure to be ideal-the access structure must be induced by a matroid. Seymour (Journal of Combinatorial Theory B, 1992) has proved that the necessary condition is not sufficient: There exists an access structure induced by a matroid that does not have an ideal scheme. The research on access structures induced by matroids is continued in this work. The main result in this paper is strengthening the result of Seymour. It is shown that in any secret-sharing scheme realizing the access structure induced by the Vamos matroid with domain of the secrets of size k, the size of the domain of the shares is at least k + Omega(radic(k)). The second result considers nonideal secret-sharing schemes realizing access structures induced by matroids. It is proved that the fact that an access structure is induced by a matroid implies lower and upper bounds on the size of the domain of shares of subsets of participants even in nonideal schemes (as long as the shares are still relatively short). This generalized results of Brickell and Davenport for ideal schemes. Finally, an example of a nonideal access structure that is nearly ideal is presented.