Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Peta-scale QMC simulations on DOE leadership computing facilities

Jeongnim Kim

Published Mar 3, 2014• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Resources Estimates for DOE Quantum Simulation Problems.

Andrew Baczewski

•Nov 6, 2023•0 citations

QMC=Chem: A Quantum Monte Carlo Program for Large-Scale Simulations in Chemistry at the Petascale Level and beyond

Anthony Scemama, Michel Caffarel, Emmanuel Oseret +1 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2013•13 citations

Practical Scalability of LuGo: Benchmarking the HHL Algorithm Using an Enhanced QPE Algorithm

Chao Lu, Muralikrishnan Gopalakrishnan Meena, Antigoni Georgiadou +7 more

The HHL algorithm is a prominent quantum algorithm that offers exponential speedup over its classical counterparts for solving a system of linear equations. However, synthesizing and executing HHL circuits demand significant computational resources from both classical and quantum systems. In this paper, we benchmark the HHL algorithm using the optimized Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) generation algorithm, LuGo [1], to enhance its scalability and efficiency. We leverage various highperformance computing (HPC) systems–the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center's (NERSC's) Perlmutter supercomputer and Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility's (OLCF's) Andes system and Frontier supercomputer–to evaluate the scalability of generating HHL circuits and to measure the time to simulate the generated circuits. Additionally, enabled by the Quantum Computing User Program (QCUP) of OLCF, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the algorithm's performance on various state-of-the-art superconducting and trappedion quantum devices, including studies on qubit connectivity, fidelity comparisons, and hardware compatibility and robustness. Our results offer preliminary insights into potential practical applications of the HHL algorithm enabled by LuGo and the performance of various types of quantum hardware.11Notice: This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan). This research used resources of the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725. This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility located at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, operated under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)•Aug 30, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Monte Carlo in the era of petascale computers

Jeongnim Kim, K. Esler, Jeremy McMinis +4 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 1, 2012•0 citations

Approach toward Linear Scaling QMC

Bryan Clark, David M. Ceperley, Eric de Sturler

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 8, 2007•0 citations

Data Files for P. Mai et al., "Fluctuating charge-density-wave correlations in the three-band Hubbard model" (2024)

Peizhi Mai, Benjamin Cohen-Stead, Thomas Maier +1 more

These are the data for P. Mai et al., "Fluctuating charge-density-wave correlations in the three-band Hubbard model" (2024) arXiv reference: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.13164 This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Award Number DE-SC0022311. This research used resources of the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility, a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725.

•Sep 5, 2024•1 citation
The HHL algorithm is a prominent quantum algorithm that offers exponential speedup over its classical counterparts for solving a system of linear equations. However, synthesizing and executing HHL circuits demand significant computational resources from both classical and quantum systems. In this paper, we benchmark the HHL algorithm using the optimized Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) generation algorithm, LuGo [1], to enhance its scalability and efficiency. We leverage various highperformance computing (HPC) systems–the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center's (NERSC's) Perlmutter supercomputer and Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility's (OLCF's) Andes system and Frontier supercomputer–to evaluate the scalability of generating HHL circuits and to measure the time to simulate the generated circuits. Additionally, enabled by the Quantum Computing User Program (QCUP) of OLCF, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the algorithm's performance on various state-of-the-art superconducting and trappedion quantum devices, including studies on qubit connectivity, fidelity comparisons, and hardware compatibility and robustness. Our results offer preliminary insights into potential practical applications of the HHL algorithm enabled by LuGo and the performance of various types of quantum hardware.11Notice: This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan). This research used resources of the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725. This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility located at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, operated under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.