Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer series in electrophysics

The Flux Mode and Charge Mode Regimes in Superconducting Weak Link Circuits

Terrence D. Clark, Robert J. Prance, Timothy P. Spiller, Helen Prance, Jason F. Ralph

Published Jan 1, 1992• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-77274-0_31

Related papers

Macroscopic quantum phenomena: Study of the flux and charge uncertainties of a superconducting weak link ring in the flux mode regime

Bruno Van Den Bossche, François Brouers, Timothy P. Spiller +3 more

Physica B Condensed Matter•Jan 1, 1995•4 citations

Charge band behaviour in a superconducting weak link driven by a normal Faraday law voltage source

Helen Prance, Robert J. Prance, Timothy P. Spiller +3 more

Physics Letters A•Sep 1, 1985•20 citations

Quantum mechanical flux band dynamics of a superconducting weak link constriction ring

Helen Prance, Timothy P. Spiller, J. E. Mutton +3 more

Physics Letters A•Mar 1, 1986•15 citations

Superconducting circuit with charge-parity protection: Theory

Xu Xiao, Clarke Smith, Angela Kou +6 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 7, 2018•0 citations

Coupled Superconducting Quantum Oscillators

Arnold H. Silver, James Edward Zimmerman

Voltage biasing of a single superconducting weak link results in coherent electromagnetic oscillation at the frequency $\ensuremath{\nu}=\frac{V}{{\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{0}}$; simultaneous voltage biasing of two weak links in a superconducting ring produces two strongly coupled oscillators at the same frequency. The electromagnetic phase difference is the difference in the gauge-invariant quantum phases across the two contacts. Because of the quantization of the superconducting ring, this phase difference is $\frac{2\ensuremath{\pi}〈\ensuremath{\Phi}〉}{{\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{0}}$, where $〈\ensuremath{\Phi}〉$ is the time-averaged magnetic flux in the superconducting circuit and ${\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{0}$ is the flux quantum. We can characterize the coupled system in terms of normal modes, and we have experimentally observed these modes of oscillation at 30 MHz. This provides a means of understanding the earlier observations of quantum interference in the resistive state.

Physical Review•Jun 10, 1967•15 citations

Localisation of pair charge states in a superconducting weak link constriction ring

Robert J. Prance, Terrence D. Clark, J. E. Mutton +3 more

Physics Letters A•Jan 1, 1985•19 citations
Voltage biasing of a single superconducting weak link results in coherent electromagnetic oscillation at the frequency $\ensuremath{\nu}=\frac{V}{{\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{0}}$; simultaneous voltage biasing of two weak links in a superconducting ring produces two strongly coupled oscillators at the same frequency. The electromagnetic phase difference is the difference in the gauge-invariant quantum phases across the two contacts. Because of the quantization of the superconducting ring, this phase difference is $\frac{2\ensuremath{\pi}〈\ensuremath{\Phi}〉}{{\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{0}}$, where $〈\ensuremath{\Phi}〉$ is the time-averaged magnetic flux in the superconducting circuit and ${\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{0}$ is the flux quantum. We can characterize the coupled system in terms of normal modes, and we have experimentally observed these modes of oscillation at 30 MHz. This provides a means of understanding the earlier observations of quantum interference in the resistive state.