Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Complementarity as corollary

R. M. Angelo, A. D. Ribeiro

Published Apr 8, 2013• 2 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Recently, Bohr's complementarity principle was assessed in setups involving delayed choices. These works argued in favor of a reformulation of the aforementioned principle so as to account for situations in which a quantum system would simultaneously behave as wave and particle. Here we defend a framework that, supported by well-known experimental results and consistent with the decoherence paradigm, allows us to interpret complementarity in terms of correlations between the system and an {\em informer}. Our proposal offers formal definition and operational interpretation for the dual behavior in terms of both nonlocal resources and the couple work-information. Most importantly, our results provide a generalized information-based trade-off for the wave-particle duality and a causal interpretation for delayed-choice experiments.

Related papers

Wave-Particle Realism in Quantum-Controlled Interferometers Assisted by Entanglement

Chithra Raj, Pedro R. Dieguez

Delayed-choice experiments challenge classical intuitions by allowing the configuration of an interferometer to be chosen after a quantum system has already entered it. While these experiments support Bohr’s complementarity principle, the introduction of quantum control reveals that the manifestation of complementarity depends critically on the full physical context — including quantum correlations and the causal order of operations. In this work, we propose and analyze a modified entanglement-assisted delayed-choice experiment that maintains the same final visibility as the standard setup but reverses its causal structure. Here, we go beyond output statistics to examine how wave-particle realism evolves throughout the interferometer. Using a contextual realism quantifier, we show that wave and particle realism can be meaningfully assigned at intermediate stages with a clear connection with the final interferometric visibility. Specifically, our results show that modifying the causal order of operations and information structure, whether through entanglement tuning or post-selection, leads to significant variations in the wave-particle complementarity relation.

Open Systems & Information Dynamics•Jun 1, 2025•0 citations

Quantum twist to complementarity: A duality relation

Tabish Qureshi

Some recent works have introduced a quantum twist to the concept of complementarity, exemplified by a setup in which the which-way detector is in a superposition of being present and absent. It has been argued that such experiments allow measurement of particle-like and wave-like behavior at the same time. Here, we derive an inequality which puts a bound on the visibility of interference and the amount of which-way information that one can obtain, in the context of such modified experiments. As the wave aspect can only be revealed by an ensemble of detections, we argue that, in such experiments, a single detection can contribute only to one subensemble, corresponding to either wave aspect or particle aspect. This way, each detected particle behaves either as particle or as wave, never both, and Bohr's complementarity is fully respected.

arXiv:1205.2207•Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics•Apr 1, 2013•10 citations

Multipath wave-particle duality with a path detector in a quantum superposition

Mohd Asad Siddiqui, Tabish Qureshi

According to Bohr's principle of complementarity, a quanton can behave either as a wave or a particle, depending on the choice of the experimental setup. Some recent two-path interference experiments have devised methods where one can have a quantum superposition of the two choices, thus indicating that a quanton may be in a superposition of wave and particle natures. These experiments have been of interest from the point of view of Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment. However, it has also been claimed that this experiment can violate complementarity. Here we theoretically analyze a multipath interference experiment that has a which-path detector in a quantum superposition of being present and absent. We show that a tight multipath wave-particle duality relation is respected in all such situations, and complementarity holds well. The apparent violation of complementarity may be due to incorrect evaluation of path distinguishability in such scenarios.

arXiv:2010.15719•Physical Review A•Feb 22, 2021•8 citations

Explaining Duality Without Complementarity or "Which Way" (Welcher-Weg) and Also Retro-Causality and Non-Locality

Sarma N. Gullapalli

An Axiom is presented and justified which (a) Explains duality in interference without complementarity or “which way” (welcher-weg) observation (b) Shows the equivalence: Coherence and alignment ≡ Interference ≡ No “which way” observation; No coherence or alignment ≡ No interference ≡ “which way” observation (c) Explains Wheeler’s delayed choice thought experiment (d) Explains results of experimental implementations of Wheeler’s experiment which show retro-causality with and without entanglement (e) Explains non-local action at a distance, and (f) Rephrases Albert Einstein’s unanswered question “Is quantum mechanics complete?” at a more fundamental level than just duality and non-locality. The explanation given does not require that the particle (photon) somehow “know” about the test setup or “which way” observation or change its behavior from particle to wave and vice versa as required by currently accepted explanation based on Niels Bohr’s complementarity principle. No new assumptions are made, only a new complete interpretation of probability which is already a fundamental assumption of quantum mechanics.

•Dec 1, 2017•0 citations

Beyond Wave–Particle Duality: The Delayed-Choice Experiment in the Intrinsic Observability Framework

Atsushi Okamoto

The delayed-choice experiment has long been regarded as one of the most conceptually intriguing demonstrations in quantum mechanics because the measurement configuration can be selected after a quantum system has already entered the experimental apparatus. This feature has often been interpreted as suggesting that the present measurement determines whether the quantum system behaved as a wave or as a particle in the past, thereby motivating discussions of wave–particle duality and retrocausality. This paper reexamines the delayed-choice experiment from the perspective of the Intrinsic Observability Framework (IOF). Rather than interpreting the experiment as demonstrating that the past is modified or that a quantum system intrinsically possesses either wave-like or particle-like properties prior to measurement, the IOF distinguishes between the pre-measurement domain of Potential Observability (PO) and the operational establishment of Observability through measurement. Within this framework, wave-like and particle-like behaviors are interpreted as observable representations established under different accessibility bases rather than intrinsic properties of the quantum system itself. Measurement grants accessibility, thereby establishing an observable representation according to the selected accessibility basis, within which observable values become operationally defined. Consequently, the delayed choice is understood not as selecting whether the quantum system was previously a wave or a particle, but as selecting the accessibility basis through which observability is established. From this perspective, the traditional wave–particle duality is reinterpreted as the basis dependence of observable representation rather than the coexistence of two fundamentally different physical natures. The delayed-choice experiment therefore illustrates how different accessibility bases lead to different observable representations while remaining fully compatible with the standard mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics.

•Sep 30, 2026•0 citations

Experimental assessment of physical realism in a quantum-controlled device

Pedro R. Dieguez, J. R. Guimarães, John P. S. Peterson +2 more

Abstract Bohr’s complementarity principle has been challenged by quantum delayed-choice experiments wherein quantum systems are claimed to behave neither as wave nor as a particle, but in an intermediary way. However, this conclusion has been supported by retro-inference and with no direct link with the system quantum state. Here, we consider a framework that employs an operational criterion of physical reality to diagnosis the system ontology directly from the quantum state at each instant of time. We show that, in disparity with previous proposals, our setup ensures a formal link between the output visibility and elements of reality within the interferometer. An experimental proof-of-principle is provided for a two-spin-1/2 system in an interferometric setup implemented in a nuclear magnetic resonance platform. We discuss how our results validate, to a great extent, Bohr’s original formulation of the complementarity principle and unveil morphing reality states.

arXiv:2104.08152•Communications Physics•Apr 6, 2022•38 citations
Recently, Bohr's complementarity principle was assessed in setups involving delayed choices. These works argued in favor of a reformulation of the aforementioned principle so as to account for situations in which a quantum system would simultaneously behave as wave and particle. Here we defend a framework that, supported by well-known experimental results and consistent with the decoherence paradigm, allows us to interpret complementarity in terms of correlations between the system and an {\em informer}. Our proposal offers formal definition and operational interpretation for the dual behavior in terms of both nonlocal resources and the couple work-information. Most importantly, our results provide a generalized information-based trade-off for the wave-particle duality and a causal interpretation for delayed-choice experiments.
Delayed-choice experiments challenge classical intuitions by allowing the configuration of an interferometer to be chosen after a quantum system has already entered it. While these experiments support Bohr’s complementarity principle, the introduction of quantum control reveals that the manifestation of complementarity depends critically on the full physical context — including quantum correlations and the causal order of operations. In this work, we propose and analyze a modified entanglement-assisted delayed-choice experiment that maintains the same final visibility as the standard setup but reverses its causal structure. Here, we go beyond output statistics to examine how wave-particle realism evolves throughout the interferometer. Using a contextual realism quantifier, we show that wave and particle realism can be meaningfully assigned at intermediate stages with a clear connection with the final interferometric visibility. Specifically, our results show that modifying the causal order of operations and information structure, whether through entanglement tuning or post-selection, leads to significant variations in the wave-particle complementarity relation.
Some recent works have introduced a quantum twist to the concept of complementarity, exemplified by a setup in which the which-way detector is in a superposition of being present and absent. It has been argued that such experiments allow measurement of particle-like and wave-like behavior at the same time. Here, we derive an inequality which puts a bound on the visibility of interference and the amount of which-way information that one can obtain, in the context of such modified experiments. As the wave aspect can only be revealed by an ensemble of detections, we argue that, in such experiments, a single detection can contribute only to one subensemble, corresponding to either wave aspect or particle aspect. This way, each detected particle behaves either as particle or as wave, never both, and Bohr's complementarity is fully respected.
According to Bohr's principle of complementarity, a quanton can behave either as a wave or a particle, depending on the choice of the experimental setup. Some recent two-path interference experiments have devised methods where one can have a quantum superposition of the two choices, thus indicating that a quanton may be in a superposition of wave and particle natures. These experiments have been of interest from the point of view of Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment. However, it has also been claimed that this experiment can violate complementarity. Here we theoretically analyze a multipath interference experiment that has a which-path detector in a quantum superposition of being present and absent. We show that a tight multipath wave-particle duality relation is respected in all such situations, and complementarity holds well. The apparent violation of complementarity may be due to incorrect evaluation of path distinguishability in such scenarios.
An Axiom is presented and justified which (a) Explains duality in interference without complementarity or “which way” (welcher-weg) observation (b) Shows the equivalence: Coherence and alignment ≡ Interference ≡ No “which way” observation; No coherence or alignment ≡ No interference ≡ “which way” observation (c) Explains Wheeler’s delayed choice thought experiment (d) Explains results of experimental implementations of Wheeler’s experiment which show retro-causality with and without entanglement (e) Explains non-local action at a distance, and (f) Rephrases Albert Einstein’s unanswered question “Is quantum mechanics complete?” at a more fundamental level than just duality and non-locality. The explanation given does not require that the particle (photon) somehow “know” about the test setup or “which way” observation or change its behavior from particle to wave and vice versa as required by currently accepted explanation based on Niels Bohr’s complementarity principle. No new assumptions are made, only a new complete interpretation of probability which is already a fundamental assumption of quantum mechanics.
The delayed-choice experiment has long been regarded as one of the most conceptually intriguing demonstrations in quantum mechanics because the measurement configuration can be selected after a quantum system has already entered the experimental apparatus. This feature has often been interpreted as suggesting that the present measurement determines whether the quantum system behaved as a wave or as a particle in the past, thereby motivating discussions of wave–particle duality and retrocausality. This paper reexamines the delayed-choice experiment from the perspective of the Intrinsic Observability Framework (IOF). Rather than interpreting the experiment as demonstrating that the past is modified or that a quantum system intrinsically possesses either wave-like or particle-like properties prior to measurement, the IOF distinguishes between the pre-measurement domain of Potential Observability (PO) and the operational establishment of Observability through measurement. Within this framework, wave-like and particle-like behaviors are interpreted as observable representations established under different accessibility bases rather than intrinsic properties of the quantum system itself. Measurement grants accessibility, thereby establishing an observable representation according to the selected accessibility basis, within which observable values become operationally defined. Consequently, the delayed choice is understood not as selecting whether the quantum system was previously a wave or a particle, but as selecting the accessibility basis through which observability is established. From this perspective, the traditional wave–particle duality is reinterpreted as the basis dependence of observable representation rather than the coexistence of two fundamentally different physical natures. The delayed-choice experiment therefore illustrates how different accessibility bases lead to different observable representations while remaining fully compatible with the standard mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics.
Abstract Bohr’s complementarity principle has been challenged by quantum delayed-choice experiments wherein quantum systems are claimed to behave neither as wave nor as a particle, but in an intermediary way. However, this conclusion has been supported by retro-inference and with no direct link with the system quantum state. Here, we consider a framework that employs an operational criterion of physical reality to diagnosis the system ontology directly from the quantum state at each instant of time. We show that, in disparity with previous proposals, our setup ensures a formal link between the output visibility and elements of reality within the interferometer. An experimental proof-of-principle is provided for a two-spin-1/2 system in an interferometric setup implemented in a nuclear magnetic resonance platform. We discuss how our results validate, to a great extent, Bohr’s original formulation of the complementarity principle and unveil morphing reality states.