Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

量子测量理论研究II J.Von Neumann的测量定理及其对量子测量的解释

王剑波

Published Jan 1, 1994• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Von Neumann代数上の統計的実験に対する最小十分性について (量子システム推定の数理)

Yui Kuramochi

•Oct 1, 2017•0 citations

Quantenmechanik und Wahrscheinlichkeit: Ein Vergleich der von von Weizsäcker und Drieschner bzw. von Ludwig vorgeschlagenen Interpretationen der Quantenmechanik

Ursula Wegener

Es wird gezeigt, dass sich die Unterschiede zwischen der Quantenmechanik-Interpretation von von Weizsäcker/Drieschner und der von Ludwig auf die jeweils unterschiedliche Beantwor-tung der folgenden Fragen zurückführen lassen: –Was ist der Referent von Wahrscheinlichkeitsaussagen in der Quantenmechanik? –Sind Gesamtheiten Mengen von Objekten? –Umfasst der Gültigkeitsbereich der Quantenmechanik auch die Messgeräte?

dialectica•Jan 1, 1983•1 citation

ハイブリッド量子古典的Ulam-von Neumann線形ソルバーベースの量子動的プログラミングアルゴリズムの開発

Chen Chih-Chieh, 斯波 廣大, 曽我部 完 +2 more

•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

Entropy, von Neumann and the von Neumann entropy

D�nes Petz

This paper is an introduction to the von Neumann entropy in a historic approach. Von Neumann's gedanken experiment is repeated, which led him to the formula of thermodynamic entropy of a statistical operator. In the analysis of his ideas we stress the role of superselection sectors and summarize von Neumann's knowledge about quantum mechanical entropy. The final part of the paper is devoted to important developments discovered long after von Neumann's work. Subadditivity and the interpretation of the von Neumann entropy as channel capacity are among those.

arXiv:math-ph/0102013•Feb 9, 2001•0 citations

Neumannの観測理論批判 : 粟屋女史への手紙に託して(放談室)

修三 小川

素粒子論研究•Jun 20, 1999•0 citations

That von Neumann Did Not Believe in a Physical Collapse

Lon Becker

Many works intended to introduce interpretive issues in quantum mechanics present John von Neumann as having a view in which measurement produces a physical collapse in the system being measured. In this paper I argue that such a reading of von Neumann is inconsistent with what von Neumann actually says. I show that much of what he says makes no sense on the physical collapse reading, but falls into place if we assume he does not have such a view. I show that the physical collapse view is based on an understanding of ‘state’ which von Neumann does not share. 1. Introduction2. The standard reading of von Neumann3. The standard reading of von Neumann and Chapter VI4. The Chapter VI argument5. The Chapter V argument6. The Chapters III and IV argument7. Conclusion

The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science•Mar 1, 2004•41 citations
This paper is an introduction to the von Neumann entropy in a historic approach. Von Neumann's gedanken experiment is repeated, which led him to the formula of thermodynamic entropy of a statistical operator. In the analysis of his ideas we stress the role of superselection sectors and summarize von Neumann's knowledge about quantum mechanical entropy. The final part of the paper is devoted to important developments discovered long after von Neumann's work. Subadditivity and the interpretation of the von Neumann entropy as channel capacity are among those.
Many works intended to introduce interpretive issues in quantum mechanics present John von Neumann as having a view in which measurement produces a physical collapse in the system being measured. In this paper I argue that such a reading of von Neumann is inconsistent with what von Neumann actually says. I show that much of what he says makes no sense on the physical collapse reading, but falls into place if we assume he does not have such a view. I show that the physical collapse view is based on an understanding of ‘state’ which von Neumann does not share. 1. Introduction2. The standard reading of von Neumann3. The standard reading of von Neumann and Chapter VI4. The Chapter VI argument5. The Chapter V argument6. The Chapters III and IV argument7. Conclusion