Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

NATO ASI series. Series B : Physics

Failure or Fermi Liquid Theory in 2 Dimensions: How to Infer it from Perturbation Theory

G. Baskaran

Published Jan 1, 1995• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4899-1042-4_25

Related papers

Failure of Fermi Liquid Theory in Two and Three Dimensions

G. Baskaran

IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks•Dec 1, 1999•1 citation

Perturbation theory for the Fermi liquids in d>1

A. Neves

Brazilian Journal of Physics•Mar 1, 1997•0 citations

Failure of Fermi Liquid Theory in 2-D: A Signal from Perturbation Theory

G. Baskaran

We study the perturbative correction to the ground state energy eigenvalue of a 2-dimensional dilute fermi gas with weak short-range two body repulsion. From the structure of the energy shift we infer the presence of an induced two body long range repulsive interaction $ {\displaystyle {1\over{r^2}} }$ among the constituent electrons indicating a potential instability of the fermi liquid ground state.

arXiv:cond-mat/9404023•Apr 11, 1994•0 citations

Fermi liquid theory in two dimensions

Sudhakar Yarlagadda, Susumu Kurihara

Physica B Condensed Matter•May 1, 1993•0 citations

A Luttinger's theorem revisited

Behnam Farid

For uniform systems of spin-less fermions in d spatial dimensions with d > 1, interacting through the isotropic two-body potential v(r-r'), a celebrated theorem due to Luttinger (1961) states that under the_assumption_ of validity of the many-body perturbation theory the self-energy Sigma(k;epsilon), with 0 ,< epsilon_F, with alpha_k >,= 0. As this is, by definition, specific to self-energies of Landau Fermi-liquid systems, treatment of non-Fermi-liquid systems are therefore thought to lie outside the domain of applicability of the many-body perturbation theory; that, for these systems, the many-body perturbation theory should_necessarily_ break down. We demonstrate that Im[Sigma(k;epsilon)] ~ -,+ alpha_k (epsilon-epsilon_F)^2, epsilon >,< epsilon_F, is_implicit_ in Luttinger's proof and that, for d > 1, in principle nothing prohibits a non-Fermi-liquid-type (and, in particular Luttinger-liquid-type) Sigma(k;epsilon) from being obtained within the framework of the many-body perturbation theory. We in addition indicate how seemingly innocuous Taylor expansions of the self-energy with respect to k, epsilon or both amount to tacitly assuming that the metallic system under consideration is a Fermi liquid, whether the self-energy is calculated perturbatively or otherwise. Proofs that a certain metallic system is in a Fermi-liquid state, based on such expansions, are therefore tautologies.

arXiv:cond-mat/0004476•Apr 27, 2000•0 citations

THE THEORY OF A FERMI LIQUID

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1965•12 citations
For uniform systems of spin-less fermions in d spatial dimensions with d > 1, interacting through the isotropic two-body potential v(r-r'), a celebrated theorem due to Luttinger (1961) states that under the_assumption_ of validity of the many-body perturbation theory the self-energy Sigma(k;epsilon), with 0 ,< epsilon_F, with alpha_k >,= 0. As this is, by definition, specific to self-energies of Landau Fermi-liquid systems, treatment of non-Fermi-liquid systems are therefore thought to lie outside the domain of applicability of the many-body perturbation theory; that, for these systems, the many-body perturbation theory should_necessarily_ break down. We demonstrate that Im[Sigma(k;epsilon)] ~ -,+ alpha_k (epsilon-epsilon_F)^2, epsilon >,< epsilon_F, is_implicit_ in Luttinger's proof and that, for d > 1, in principle nothing prohibits a non-Fermi-liquid-type (and, in particular Luttinger-liquid-type) Sigma(k;epsilon) from being obtained within the framework of the many-body perturbation theory. We in addition indicate how seemingly innocuous Taylor expansions of the self-energy with respect to k, epsilon or both amount to tacitly assuming that the metallic system under consideration is a Fermi liquid, whether the self-energy is calculated perturbatively or otherwise. Proofs that a certain metallic system is in a Fermi-liquid state, based on such expansions, are therefore tautologies.