Wigner representation In classical optics (Born and Wolf, 1999), the state of the electromagnetic oscillator is perfectly described by the statistics of the classical amplitude α . The amplitude may be completely fixed (then the field is coherent), or α may fluctuate (then the field is partially coherent or incoherent). In classical optics as well as in classical mechanics, we can characterize the statistics of the complex amplitude?or, equivalently, the statistics of the components position q and momentum p introducing a phase space distribution W ( q , p ). (As explained in Section 3.1, the real and the imaginary part of the complex amplitude α can be regarded as the position and the momentum of the electromagnetic oscillator.) The distribution W ( q , p ) quantifies the probability of finding a particular pair of q and p values in their simultaneous measurement. Knowing the phase space probability distribution, all statistical quantities of the electromagnetic oscillator can be predicted by calculation. In this sense the phase space distribution describes the state in classical physics. All this is much more subtle in quantum mechanics. First of all, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle prevents us from observing position momentum simultaneously and precisely. So it seems there is no point in thinking about quantum phase space. But wait! In quantum mechanics we cannot directly observe quantum states either. Nevertheless, we are legitimately entitled to use the concept of states as if they were existing entities (whatever they are). We use their properties to predict the statistics of observations.
Wigner representation In classical optics (Born and Wolf, 1999), the state of the electromagnetic oscillator is perfectly described by the statistics of the classical amplitude α . The amplitude may be completely fixed (then the field is coherent), or α may fluctuate (then the field is partially coherent or incoherent). In classical optics as well as in classical mechanics, we can characterize the statistics of the complex amplitude?or, equivalently, the statistics of the components position q and momentum p introducing a phase space distribution W ( q , p ). (As explained in Section 3.1, the real and the imaginary part of the complex amplitude α can be regarded as the position and the momentum of the electromagnetic oscillator.) The distribution W ( q , p ) quantifies the probability of finding a particular pair of q and p values in their simultaneous measurement. Knowing the phase space probability distribution, all statistical quantities of the electromagnetic oscillator can be predicted by calculation. In this sense the phase space distribution describes the state in classical physics. All this is much more subtle in quantum mechanics. First of all, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle prevents us from observing position momentum simultaneously and precisely. So it seems there is no point in thinking about quantum phase space. But wait! In quantum mechanics we cannot directly observe quantum states either. Nevertheless, we are legitimately entitled to use the concept of states as if they were existing entities (whatever they are). We use their properties to predict the statistics of observations.
The first part is a systematical representation of the Wigner quasiprobability in representations by canonical variables and pairs of complex conjugate variables with particular attention to the reconstruction of the density operator from the Wigner quasiprobability to show their equivalence. All formulae are derived from basic postulates of quantum mechanics. Problems of operator orderings are touched. The second part considers the integration over the amplitude in the Wigner quasiprobability and its specialization for coherent states and for even and odd coherent states and provides phase distributions which are presented in graphics that are new in their kind. It is demonstrated that the Heitler number phase uncertainty relation is incorrect. The problem of the transition from quantum to classical distribution functions by ℏ→0 is discussed with the conjecture that the inertial point of the distributions plays a basic role.
The Wigner quasiprobability, along with some of its essentialproperties, is introduced and discussed in two versions, first covering real canonical variables such as W(q,p) and second a pair of complex conjugate coordinates such as W(α,α*). The reconstruction of the density operator ϱ of states is also given. Building upon the Susskind–Glogower concept of quantum phase operators, further aspects of phase operator algebras in the quantum optics of a harmonic oscillator are discussed in relation to the realization of the su(1,1) Lie algebra. Coherent phase states |ε⟩ are introduced in analogy to the common coherent states |α⟩ in two ways, as both eigenstates of certain operators and as states generated from a ground state |0⟩ by operators of the Lie group SU(1,1). The limiting transition to the non-normalizable Fritz London phase states |eiφ⟩ on the unit circle and an (over)-completeness relation for the coherent phase states are derived. The Wigner quasiprobability W(q,p) for the coherent phase states is calculated and graphically represented. From the Wigner quasiprobability, a phase distribution W(φ) is calculated by integrating over the radius, and its uncertainty is defined and presented. The Hilbert–Schmidt distance is discussed as a measure of the non-classicality of states, where most of our with Viktor Dodonov work was carried out.
We define a quasiprobability distribution SNP(n,\ensuremath{\theta}) which describes the quantum statistics of the photon number and phase observables of a single-mode field (or, equivalently, a harmonic oscillator). The properties of SNP(n,\ensuremath{\theta}) are the photon number and phase analogies of the properties of Wigner's original function, which describes the position and momentum observables. For example, the marginals of SNP(n,\ensuremath{\theta}) are the continuous phase and the discrete photon-number probability distributions. We give examples of the SNP(n,\ensuremath{\theta}) representation of various states and show, in particular, that SNP(n,\ensuremath{\theta}) displays the quantum interference associated with Schr\"odinger cat states. We also describe how SNP(n,\ensuremath{\theta}) can be determined from quantities that are, in principle, measurable.
In Chapter 4, we introduced the concept of the photon number representation of the electromagnetic (EM) field that is based on the number states, the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian of the EM field. However, this is not the only possible representation, in fact not always the most convenient. In this chapter, we introduce the concept of phase space representations of a quantum system which is in a state described by the density operator ρˆ. The density operator of a given system encodes classical as well as non-classical (quantum) properties of the system. How to distinguish these two kinds of properties is of basic importance in quantum optics. Therefore, we shall address this issue by using representations of the density operator that are based on the parametric space of complex eigenvalues of the annihilation operator aˆ in a coherent state |α〉. We first determine what we mean by the density operator of a quantum system and discuss its basic properties. Next, we introduce different representations of the density operator in terms of coherent state projectors |α〉〈α|. The representations show that a state of the EM field or of an arbitrary quantum system may be regarded as a mixture of coherent states. Along the way, we will learn how to find the P , Q and Wigner representations of the density operator, what are their properties, how to interpret the properties and how to calculate relations between the different representations. Most importantly, certain field states exhibit non- classical features and these non-classical features can be manifested in the phase space representations. Accordingly, we will learn how the representations are very convenient tools to describe quantum states of simple systems.
Introduction In our discussion of the classical electromagnetic field we found it convenient to describe the field by a complex amplitude, both in the frequency and in the time domains. The complex representation is convenient partly because it contains information about the magnitude and about the phase of the electromagnetic disturbance, and partly because of its analytic properties. These features turn out to be particularly useful for the description of the optical coherence properties of the field. We shall see that an analogous quantum state of the field exists, leading to an interesting representation that is also particularly useful for the treatment of optical coherence. This coherent-state representation leads to a close correspondence between the quantum and classical correlation functions. The coherent states of the field come as close as possible to being classical states of definite complex amplitude. We shall find that coherent states turn out to be particularly appropriate for the description of the electromagnetic fields generated by coherent sources, like lasers and parametric oscillators; indeed it turns out that the field produced by any deterministic current source is in a coherent state. In the following sections we shall examine some of the properties of coherent states, and then go on to discuss representations based on these states. Coherent states were first discovered in connection with the quantum harmonic oscillator by Schrödinger (1926), who referred to them as states of minimum uncertainty product.
Phase space is the unity of position and momentum configuration space. It allows for an effective description of dynamical systems and is particularly useful when it comes to studying chaos theory and statistical mechanics. After the advent of quantum physics early in the 20th century, E. Wigner [91], J. E. Moyal [62] and H. J. Groenewold [31] introduce a quantum theory in phase space. Despite the apparent added complexity of the mathematics involved in this new framework, the underlying classical and quantum equations show many similarities. The probability distribution in classical physics becomes the Wigner distribution, a probability distribution usually featuring negative values. In 2013, O. Steuernagel and D. Kakofengitis, inspired by the work of H. Bauke [7] and E. Wigner [91], identified the quantum analogue of the classical phase space flow: the Wigner current J [83]. This Wigner current allows the visualisation of quantum dynamics through a quantum fluid dynamics perspective in phase space. This thesis is written by collection of five articles. They are prefaced by an introduction into the basics of quantum phase space theory and its link with both classical phase space dynamics and the standard Schrödinger approach, followed by the articles published during this PhD. Article 1 shows the importance of the integral form of the Wigner current. We use it to derive the Ehrenfest’s theorem, as well as to refute some propositions made within the community. Article 2 shows that, using the Wigner current, an Eulerian and Lagrangian point of view do not always give the same results for the quantum case. We demonstrate that the negativities of the Wigner distribution, sign of quantumness of the system, are created by the Wigner velocity field singularities. The Wigner velocity field is the quantum analogue of the classical phase space velocity field. In Article 3, we see that even though Wigner distributions of quantum systems feature spotty structures which saturate on scales ɑZ [97], the construction of a superoscillating Wigner distribution allows one to generate much smaller structures, of the order of ɑZ /α with α a positive constant potentially very large. In Article 4, we introduce the concept of quantum shear suppression in phase space. The Wigner current features an effective quantum “viscosity”, suppressing classical dynamics fine details. This viscosity is the mechanism by which the Zurek scale is enforced dynamically onto the state in phase space. In Article 5, we apply the previous ideas to Kerr-type oscillators. Its Wigner current is derived, and using it we show that its values are conserved on a ring during the time evolution of the Kerr oscillator. The shear suppression is also studied.