Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Mathematics With Natural Reality — Action Flows

Linfan Mao

Published Oct 5, 2015• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The universality of contradiction implies that the reality of a thing is only hold on observation with level dependent on the observer standing out or in and lead respectively to solvable equation or non-solvable equations on that thing for human beings.
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.34838

Related papers

Disproof of the Many-Worlds Interpretation: The Hierarchy of Contradictions and Incompatibility with Foundational Mathematics

Miltiadis Karazoupis

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

A Review on Natural Reality with Physical Equations

Linfan Mao

A natural behavior is used to characterize by differential equation established on hu- \nman observations, which is assumed to be on one particle or on \ne field complied with \nreproducibility. However, the multilateral property of a particle \nP \nand the mathematical \nconsistence determine that such an understanding is only local, not the whole reality \non \nP \n, which leads to a central thesis for knowing the nature, i.e. \nhow to establish a \nphysical equation with a proper interpretation on a thing \n. As it is well-known, a thing \nconsists of parts. Reviewing on observations, we classify them into two categories, i.e. \nout-observation \nand \nin-observation \nfor discussion. The former is such an observation \nthat the observer is out of the particle or the field \nP \n, which is in fact a macroscopic \nobservation and its dynamic equation characterizes the coherent behavior of all parts in \nP \n, but the later is asked into the particle or the field by arranging observers simultane- \nously on different subparticles or subfields in \nP \nand respectively establishing physical \nequations, which are contradictory and given up in classical because there are not ap- \nplicable conclusions on contradictory systems in mathematics. However, the existence \nnaturally implies the necessity of the nature. Applying a combinatorial notion, i.e. \nG \nL \n- \nsolutions on non-solvable equations, a new notion for holding on the reality of nature \nis suggested in this paper, which makes it clear that the knowing on the nature by solv- \nable equations is macro, only holding on these coherent behaviors of particles, but the \nnon-coherent naturally induces non-solvable equations, which implies that the knowing \nby \nG \nL \n-solution of equations is the effective, includes the classical characterizing as a \nspecial case by solvable equations, i.e. mathematical combinatorics.

•Jul 1, 2015•0 citations

Human Beings and Their Environment in Terms of Quantum Mechanics and the Unity of All Things

Hong Lee Park

신학논단•Jun 1, 2004•0 citations

Matter and Consciousness – Existence as a Form of Mathematics of the World

Jerzy Żyżyński

•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

Natural Philosophical Critique of Quantum Mechanics

H. J. Spencer

This paper re-opens the debate on the failure of quantum mechanics to provide an understandable view of micro-reality. A critique is offered of the commonly accepted ‘Copenhagen Interpretation’ of a theory that is only a mathematical approach to the level of reality characterized by atoms and electrons. This critique is based on the oldest approach to thinking about nature for over 2500 years, known as Natural Philosophy. Quantum mechanics (QM) was developed over the first quarter of the 20th Century, when scientists were enthralled by a new philosophy known as Positivism, whose foundations were based on the assumption that material objects exist only when measured by humans – This central assumption conflates epistemology (knowledge) with ontology (existence). The present critique rejects this human-centered view of reality by assuming material reality has existed long before (and will persist long after) human beings (“Realism”). The defensive view that the micro-world is too different to understand using regular thinking (and only a mathematical approach is possible) is rejected totally. At least 12 earlier QM interpretations are critically analyzed, indicating the broad interest in “what does QM mean?” The standard theory of quantum mechanics is thus constructed on only how the micro-world appears to macro measurements - as such, it cannot offer any view of how the foundations of the world are acting when humans are not observing it - this has generated almost 100 years of confusion and contradiction at the very heart of physics. Significantly, we live in a world that is not being measured by scientists but is interacting with itself and with us. QM has failed to provide explanations: only recipes (meaningless equations), not insights. Physics has returned to the pre-Newtonian world of Ptolemaic phenomenology: only verifiable numbers without real understanding. The focus needs to be on an explicit linkage between the micro-world, when left to itself, and our mental models of this sphere of material reality, via the mechanism of measurement. This limits the role of measurement to confirming our mental models of reality but never confusing these with a direct image of ‘the thing in itself’. This implies a deep divide between reality and appearances. This paper proposes that it is the attempt to preserve continuum mathematics (especially calculus), which drives much of the mystery and confusion behind all attempts to understand quantum mechanics. The introduction of discrete mathematics is proposed to help analyze the discrete interactions between the quintessential quantum objects: the electrons and their novel properties. Additionally, several hidden major assumptions have been present in Classical Mechanics (represented by continuum mathematics) since its inception by Newton that are blocking progress and understanding of quantum mechanics. A related paper demonstrates that it is possible to create a point-particle theory of electrons that explains all their peculiar (and ‘paradoxical’) behavior without introducing the continuum mathematical ideas of fields or waves. * Surrey, B.C. Canada (604) 542-2299 spsi99@telus.net Version 1.195 10-07-2016 Begun 23-06-2008 {pp. 80, 70.4 Kw; 800 KB}

•Dec 1, 2016•0 citations

A Review On Natural Reality With Physical Equations

Linfan Mao

A natural behavior is used to characterized by differential equation established on human observations, which is assumed to be on one particle or one field complied with reproducibility. However, the multilateral property of a particle P and the mathematical consistence determine that such a understanding is only local, not the whole reality on P, which leads to a central thesis for knowing the nature, i.e., how to establish a physical equation with a proper interpretation on a thing. As it is well-known, a thing consists of parts. Reviewing on observations, we classify them into two categories, i.e., out-observation and in-observation for discussion.

Progress in physics•Jul 1, 2015•5 citations
A natural behavior is used to characterize by differential equation established on hu- \nman observations, which is assumed to be on one particle or on \ne field complied with \nreproducibility. However, the multilateral property of a particle \nP \nand the mathematical \nconsistence determine that such an understanding is only local, not the whole reality \non \nP \n, which leads to a central thesis for knowing the nature, i.e. \nhow to establish a \nphysical equation with a proper interpretation on a thing \n. As it is well-known, a thing \nconsists of parts. Reviewing on observations, we classify them into two categories, i.e. \nout-observation \nand \nin-observation \nfor discussion. The former is such an observation \nthat the observer is out of the particle or the field \nP \n, which is in fact a macroscopic \nobservation and its dynamic equation characterizes the coherent behavior of all parts in \nP \n, but the later is asked into the particle or the field by arranging observers simultane- \nously on different subparticles or subfields in \nP \nand respectively establishing physical \nequations, which are contradictory and given up in classical because there are not ap- \nplicable conclusions on contradictory systems in mathematics. However, the existence \nnaturally implies the necessity of the nature. Applying a combinatorial notion, i.e. \nG \nL \n- \nsolutions on non-solvable equations, a new notion for holding on the reality of nature \nis suggested in this paper, which makes it clear that the knowing on the nature by solv- \nable equations is macro, only holding on these coherent behaviors of particles, but the \nnon-coherent naturally induces non-solvable equations, which implies that the knowing \nby \nG \nL \n-solution of equations is the effective, includes the classical characterizing as a \nspecial case by solvable equations, i.e. mathematical combinatorics.
This paper re-opens the debate on the failure of quantum mechanics to provide an understandable view of micro-reality. A critique is offered of the commonly accepted ‘Copenhagen Interpretation’ of a theory that is only a mathematical approach to the level of reality characterized by atoms and electrons. This critique is based on the oldest approach to thinking about nature for over 2500 years, known as Natural Philosophy. Quantum mechanics (QM) was developed over the first quarter of the 20th Century, when scientists were enthralled by a new philosophy known as Positivism, whose foundations were based on the assumption that material objects exist only when measured by humans – This central assumption conflates epistemology (knowledge) with ontology (existence). The present critique rejects this human-centered view of reality by assuming material reality has existed long before (and will persist long after) human beings (“Realism”). The defensive view that the micro-world is too different to understand using regular thinking (and only a mathematical approach is possible) is rejected totally. At least 12 earlier QM interpretations are critically analyzed, indicating the broad interest in “what does QM mean?” The standard theory of quantum mechanics is thus constructed on only how the micro-world appears to macro measurements - as such, it cannot offer any view of how the foundations of the world are acting when humans are not observing it - this has generated almost 100 years of confusion and contradiction at the very heart of physics. Significantly, we live in a world that is not being measured by scientists but is interacting with itself and with us. QM has failed to provide explanations: only recipes (meaningless equations), not insights. Physics has returned to the pre-Newtonian world of Ptolemaic phenomenology: only verifiable numbers without real understanding. The focus needs to be on an explicit linkage between the micro-world, when left to itself, and our mental models of this sphere of material reality, via the mechanism of measurement. This limits the role of measurement to confirming our mental models of reality but never confusing these with a direct image of ‘the thing in itself’. This implies a deep divide between reality and appearances. This paper proposes that it is the attempt to preserve continuum mathematics (especially calculus), which drives much of the mystery and confusion behind all attempts to understand quantum mechanics. The introduction of discrete mathematics is proposed to help analyze the discrete interactions between the quintessential quantum objects: the electrons and their novel properties. Additionally, several hidden major assumptions have been present in Classical Mechanics (represented by continuum mathematics) since its inception by Newton that are blocking progress and understanding of quantum mechanics. A related paper demonstrates that it is possible to create a point-particle theory of electrons that explains all their peculiar (and ‘paradoxical’) behavior without introducing the continuum mathematical ideas of fields or waves. * Surrey, B.C. Canada (604) 542-2299 spsi99@telus.net Version 1.195 10-07-2016 Begun 23-06-2008 {pp. 80, 70.4 Kw; 800 KB}
A natural behavior is used to characterized by differential equation established on human observations, which is assumed to be on one particle or one field complied with reproducibility. However, the multilateral property of a particle P and the mathematical consistence determine that such a understanding is only local, not the whole reality on P, which leads to a central thesis for knowing the nature, i.e., how to establish a physical equation with a proper interpretation on a thing. As it is well-known, a thing consists of parts. Reviewing on observations, we classify them into two categories, i.e., out-observation and in-observation for discussion.