Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Quantum Error Correction with Mixed State Ancilla Qubits

Mikio Nakahara, Yasushi Kondo, Chiara Bagnasco

Published Mar 20, 2013• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Logical error rates in the quantum error correction using small number of ancilla qubits

Sasaki Kohei, 康弘 都倉, Yasushi Yoshida

日本物理学会講演概要集•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

Quantum error correction beyond qubits

Takao Aoki, Go Takahashi, Tadashi Kajiya +4 more

arXiv:0811.3734•Nature Physics•Jun 28, 2009•144 citations

Quantum error correction with mixed ancilla qubits

Ben Criger, Osama Moussa, Raymond Laflamme

Most quantum error-correcting codes are predicated on the assumption that there exists a reservoir of qubits in the state $|0\ensuremath{\rangle}$ which can be used as ancilla qubits to prepare multiqubit logical states. In this Brief Report, we examine the consequences of relaxing this assumption and propose a method to increase the fidelity produced by a given code when the ancilla qubits are initialized in mixed states, using the same number of qubits, at most doubling the number of gates when the recovery operation would already be implemented. The procedure implemented consists of altering the encoding operator to include the inverse of the unitary operation used to correct detected errors after decoding. This augmentation will be especially useful in quantum computing architectures that do not possess projective measurement, such as solid-state NMR quantum information processing.

arXiv:1201.1517•Physical Review A•Apr 20, 2012•15 citations

Benchmarking Machine Learning Models for Quantum Error Correction

Zhao, Yue

Quantum Error Correction (QEC) is one of the fundamental problems in quantum computer systems, which aims to detect and correct errors in the data qubits within quantum computers. Due to the presence of unreliable data qubits in existing quantum computers, implementing quantum error correction is a critical step when establishing a stable quantum computer system. Recently, machine learning (ML)-based approaches have been proposed to address this challenge. However, they lack a thorough understanding of quantum error correction. To bridge this research gap, we provide a new perspective to understand machine learning-based QEC in this paper. We find that syndromes in the ancilla qubits result from errors on connected data qubits, and distant ancilla qubits can provide auxiliary information to rule out some incorrect predictions for the data qubits. Therefore, to detect errors in data qubits, we must consider the information present in the long-range ancilla qubits. To the best of our knowledge, machine learning is less explored in the dependency relationship of QEC. To fill the blank, we curate a machine learning benchmark to assess the capacity to capture long-range dependencies for quantum error correction. To provide a comprehensive evaluation, we evaluate seven state-of-the-art deep learning algorithms spanning diverse neural network architectures, such as convolutional neural networks, graph neural networks, and graph transformers. Our exhaustive experiments reveal an enlightening trend: By enlarging the receptive field to exploit information from distant ancilla qubits, the accuracy of QEC significantly improves. For instance, U-Net can improve CNN by a margin of about 50%. Finally, we provide a comprehensive analysis that could inspire future research in this field.

arXiv:2311.11167•Nov 18, 2023•0 citations

Quantum error correction of a qubit encoded in grid states of an oscillator

Philippe Campagne-Ibarcq, Alec Eickbusch, Steven Touzard +10 more

arXiv:1907.12487•Nature•Aug 19, 2020•456 citations

Two-reservoir model of quantum error correction

James Clemens, Julio R. Gea-Banacloche

We consider a two-reservoir model of quantum error correction with a hot bath causing errors in the qubits and a cold bath cooling the ancilla qubits to a fiducial state. We consider error correction protocols both with and without measurement of the ancilla state. The error correction acts as a kind of refrigeration process to maintain the data qubits in a low entropy state by periodically moving the entropy to the ancilla qubits and then to the cold reservoir. We quantify the performance of the error correction as a function of the reservoir temperatures and cooling rate by means of the fidelity and the residual entropy of the data qubits. We also make a comparison with the continuous quantum error correction model of Sarovar and Milburn [Phys. Rev. A 72, 012306 (2005)].

arXiv:quant-ph/0508155•Physical Review A•Feb 22, 2006•1 citation
Most quantum error-correcting codes are predicated on the assumption that there exists a reservoir of qubits in the state $|0\ensuremath{\rangle}$ which can be used as ancilla qubits to prepare multiqubit logical states. In this Brief Report, we examine the consequences of relaxing this assumption and propose a method to increase the fidelity produced by a given code when the ancilla qubits are initialized in mixed states, using the same number of qubits, at most doubling the number of gates when the recovery operation would already be implemented. The procedure implemented consists of altering the encoding operator to include the inverse of the unitary operation used to correct detected errors after decoding. This augmentation will be especially useful in quantum computing architectures that do not possess projective measurement, such as solid-state NMR quantum information processing.
Quantum Error Correction (QEC) is one of the fundamental problems in quantum computer systems, which aims to detect and correct errors in the data qubits within quantum computers. Due to the presence of unreliable data qubits in existing quantum computers, implementing quantum error correction is a critical step when establishing a stable quantum computer system. Recently, machine learning (ML)-based approaches have been proposed to address this challenge. However, they lack a thorough understanding of quantum error correction. To bridge this research gap, we provide a new perspective to understand machine learning-based QEC in this paper. We find that syndromes in the ancilla qubits result from errors on connected data qubits, and distant ancilla qubits can provide auxiliary information to rule out some incorrect predictions for the data qubits. Therefore, to detect errors in data qubits, we must consider the information present in the long-range ancilla qubits. To the best of our knowledge, machine learning is less explored in the dependency relationship of QEC. To fill the blank, we curate a machine learning benchmark to assess the capacity to capture long-range dependencies for quantum error correction. To provide a comprehensive evaluation, we evaluate seven state-of-the-art deep learning algorithms spanning diverse neural network architectures, such as convolutional neural networks, graph neural networks, and graph transformers. Our exhaustive experiments reveal an enlightening trend: By enlarging the receptive field to exploit information from distant ancilla qubits, the accuracy of QEC significantly improves. For instance, U-Net can improve CNN by a margin of about 50%. Finally, we provide a comprehensive analysis that could inspire future research in this field.
We consider a two-reservoir model of quantum error correction with a hot bath causing errors in the qubits and a cold bath cooling the ancilla qubits to a fiducial state. We consider error correction protocols both with and without measurement of the ancilla state. The error correction acts as a kind of refrigeration process to maintain the data qubits in a low entropy state by periodically moving the entropy to the ancilla qubits and then to the cold reservoir. We quantify the performance of the error correction as a function of the reservoir temperatures and cooling rate by means of the fidelity and the residual entropy of the data qubits. We also make a comparison with the continuous quantum error correction model of Sarovar and Milburn [Phys. Rev. A 72, 012306 (2005)].