Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Optimal Control of Quantum Measurement for Superconducting Phase Qubits

Frank K. Wilhelm, Daniel J. Egger

Published Mar 5, 2015• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Optimal Control of Superconducting Qubits

Max Werninghaus, Daniel J. Egger, Federico Roy +3 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 5, 2020•0 citations

Control of Superconducting Qubits: Merging Pulse Calibration and System Characterization using Optimal Control

Shai Machnes, Frank K. Wilhelm

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 7, 2018•0 citations

Optimal Control and Coherence Engineering for Superconducting Qubits

Yunwei Lu

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Performance Gains for Superconducting Qubits by Means of Optimal Control Theory

Robert Roloff, Walter Poetz

APS•Mar 1, 2009•0 citations

Mitigating Superconducting Qubit Crosstalk via Optimal Control

J. H. Béjanin, M. Mariantoni

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 7, 2018•0 citations

Leakage reduction in fast superconducting qubit gates via optimal control

M. Werninghaus, D. J. Egger, F. Roy +3 more

Abstract Reaching high-speed, high-fidelity qubit operations requires precise control over the shape of the underlying pulses. For weakly anharmonic systems, such as superconducting transmon qubits, short gates lead to leakage to states outside of the computational subspace. Control pulses designed with open-loop optimal control may reduce such leakage. However, model inaccuracies can severely limit the usability of such pulses. We implemented a closed-loop optimization that simultaneously adapts all control parameters based on measurements of a cost function built from Clifford gates. We directly optimize the amplitude and phase of each sample point of the digitized control pulse. We thereby fully exploit the capabilities of the pulse generation electronics and create a 4.16 ns single-qubit pulse with 99.76 % fidelity and 0.044 % leakage. This is a sevenfold reduction of the leakage rate and a threefold reduction in standard errors of the best DRAG pulse we have calibrated at such short durations on the same system.

arXiv:2003.05952•npj Quantum Information•Jan 29, 2021•192 citations
Abstract Reaching high-speed, high-fidelity qubit operations requires precise control over the shape of the underlying pulses. For weakly anharmonic systems, such as superconducting transmon qubits, short gates lead to leakage to states outside of the computational subspace. Control pulses designed with open-loop optimal control may reduce such leakage. However, model inaccuracies can severely limit the usability of such pulses. We implemented a closed-loop optimization that simultaneously adapts all control parameters based on measurements of a cost function built from Clifford gates. We directly optimize the amplitude and phase of each sample point of the digitized control pulse. We thereby fully exploit the capabilities of the pulse generation electronics and create a 4.16 ns single-qubit pulse with 99.76 % fidelity and 0.044 % leakage. This is a sevenfold reduction of the leakage rate and a threefold reduction in standard errors of the best DRAG pulse we have calibrated at such short durations on the same system.