Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Acta Phys. Polon.

ON THE QUANTUM-MECHANICAL DESCRIPTION OF NON-ISOLATED SYSTEMS

K. Zalewski

Published Nov 1, 1963• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

The Schrodinger equation with a time-dependent hamiltonian is sometimes applied to the study of non-isolated systems. It is shown that this is correct (with a proper choice of the hamiltonian) if and only if the state of the system is initially pure and remains so with increasing time. Further the problem of describing a non-isolated system by the density matrix of a pure state is discussed. (auth)

Related papers

ON THE APPROXIMATE APPLICABILITY OF THE SCHRODINGER EQUATION TO NON- ISOLATED SYSTEMS

B. Sredniava, J. Weyssenhoff

Problems in which Schrodinger's equation with timedependent hamiltonian is applied to one system should rather be considered as representing cases of two systems, the second acting appreciably on the first but not inversely; the systems as a whole is then considered to be isolated and, consequently, subject to treatment by means of a Schrodinger equation with time-independent hamiltonian. The composition and decomposition of systems is dealt with by the method of statistical operators of v. Neumann. Both methods of dealing with the problem are shown to lead in good approximation to the same results, but only for times fulfilling a given inequality. (auth)

Acta Phys. Polon.•Feb 1, 1963•0 citations

Quantum Dynamics Using The Time-Dependent Schrödinger Equation

Abraham Nitzan

This chapter focuses on the time-dependent Schrödinger equation and its solutions for several prototype systems. It provides the basis for discussing and understanding quantum dynamics in condensed phases, however, a full picture can be obtained only by including also dynamical processes that destroy the quantum mechanical phase. Such a full description of quantum dynamics cannot be handled by the Schrödinger equation alone; a more general approach based on the quantum Liouville equation is needed. This important part of the theory of quantum dynamics is discussed in Chapter 10. Given a system characterized by a Hamiltonian Ĥ , the time-dependent Schrödinger equation is For a closed, isolated system Ĥ is time independent; time dependence in the Hamiltonian enters via effect of time-dependent external forces. Here we focus on the earlier case. Equation (1) is a first-order linear differential equation that can be solved as an initial value problem.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Apr 6, 2006•0 citations

The Time-Evolution of States in Quantum Mechanics

Jürg Martin Fröhlich, Alessandro Pizzo

It is argued that the Schrödinger equation does not yield a correct description of the quantum-mechanical time evolution of states of isolated (open) systems featuring events. A precise general law for the time evolution of states replacing the Schrödinger equation is formulated within the so-called ETH-Approach to Quantum Mechanics. This law eliminates the infamous "measurement problem." Our general results are illustrated by an analysis of simple models describing a very heavy atom coupled to the quantized radiation field in a limit where the speed of light tends to infinity. The discussion of these models is the main subject of our paper.

arXiv:2101.01044•Jan 4, 2021•2 citations

ON THE SHORT-TIME BEHAVIOR OF QUANTUM MECHANICAL SYSTEMS

Hiromichi Nakazato, Saverio Pascazio

The conditions that yield deviations from a purely exponential behavior of a quantum mechanical system at short times are analyzed with special emphasis on the boundedness of the Hamiltonian. A few practical examples are considered. The problem of dissipation in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory is also briefly discussed.

Modern Physics Letters A•Dec 28, 1995•6 citations

More on the quantum measurement problem

Donald G. Truhlar

Sean Carroll’s July Quick Study, “Addressing the quantum measurement problem” (page 62), brings up the following question: Does the wavefunction still obey the Schrödinger equation when a measurement is made? A system being measured (or interacting with its environment in any other way) is actually a subsystem, and a subsystem is properly described by a reduced density matrix. The density matrix for an entire system corresponds to a wavefunction—that is, to a pure state—but the density matrix for a subsystem does not necessarily correspond to a wavefunction. The reduced density matrix of a subsystem may correspond to an impure state, also called a mixture or an incoherent combination,11. A. Bohm, Quantum Mechanics: Foundations and Applications, 3rd ed., Springer (1993), p. 72. which does not have well-defined pure-state content.22. See, for example, L. E. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development, 2nd ed., World Scientific (2015), chap. 2. In the words of Kurt Gottfried and Tung-Mow Yan, “systems in the real world are rarely in pure states.”33. K. Gottfried, T.-M. Yan, Quantum Mechanics: Fundamentals, 2nd ed., Springer (2003), p. 46.The proper way to discuss a measurement is not using a wavefunction but rather a reduced density matrix. The density matrix of a pure state evolves according to the Liouville–von Neumann equation, which is equivalent to the unitary evolution of the wavefunction by the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. For a subsystem (that is, for any system except the entire universe), the reduced density matrix evolves according to the nonunitary Liouville–von Neumann equation, which has an additional contribution causing decoherence and dissipation.44. See, for example, D. A. Micha, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 80, 394 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-461X(2000)80:3<394::AID-QUA9>3.0.CO;2-U The nature of the measurement—or, more generally, the nature of the subsystem–environment interaction—selects a preferred basis, called the pointer basis, and the subsystem decoheres into an effectively classical mixture in the pointer basis. (See the article by Wojciech Zurek, Physics Today, October 1991, page 36.)ReferencesSection:ChooseTop of pageReferences <<1. A. Bohm, Quantum Mechanics: Foundations and Applications, 3rd ed., Springer (1993), p. 72. Google Scholar2. See, for example, L. E. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development, 2nd ed., World Scientific (2015), chap. 2. Google Scholar3. K. Gottfried, T.-M. Yan, Quantum Mechanics: Fundamentals, 2nd ed., Springer (2003), p. 46. Google ScholarCrossref4. See, for example, D. A. Micha, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 80, 394 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-461X(2000)80:3<394::AID-QUA9>3.0.CO;2-U, Google ScholarCrossref© 2022 American Institute of Physics.

Physics Today•Nov 1, 2022•0 citations

Solutions of time-dependent Schrodinger equations for model non-Hermitian quantum mechanical systems

B. L. Burrows

The time-dependent Schrodinger equation is solved for two model problems for a non-Hermitian quantum system.A simple matrix model system is used to examine two critical problems for these systems: complex and non-observable energies and situations where the matrix is defective. In addition the stationary states for infinite dimensional model system, which is confined in space , is examined and it is shown that the pattern of eigenvalue energies differs from when the system is unconfined.

arXiv:2412.07457•Dec 10, 2024•0 citations
The Schrodinger equation with a time-dependent hamiltonian is sometimes applied to the study of non-isolated systems. It is shown that this is correct (with a proper choice of the hamiltonian) if and only if the state of the system is initially pure and remains so with increasing time. Further the problem of describing a non-isolated system by the density matrix of a pure state is discussed. (auth)
Problems in which Schrodinger's equation with timedependent hamiltonian is applied to one system should rather be considered as representing cases of two systems, the second acting appreciably on the first but not inversely; the systems as a whole is then considered to be isolated and, consequently, subject to treatment by means of a Schrodinger equation with time-independent hamiltonian. The composition and decomposition of systems is dealt with by the method of statistical operators of v. Neumann. Both methods of dealing with the problem are shown to lead in good approximation to the same results, but only for times fulfilling a given inequality. (auth)
This chapter focuses on the time-dependent Schrödinger equation and its solutions for several prototype systems. It provides the basis for discussing and understanding quantum dynamics in condensed phases, however, a full picture can be obtained only by including also dynamical processes that destroy the quantum mechanical phase. Such a full description of quantum dynamics cannot be handled by the Schrödinger equation alone; a more general approach based on the quantum Liouville equation is needed. This important part of the theory of quantum dynamics is discussed in Chapter 10. Given a system characterized by a Hamiltonian Ĥ , the time-dependent Schrödinger equation is For a closed, isolated system Ĥ is time independent; time dependence in the Hamiltonian enters via effect of time-dependent external forces. Here we focus on the earlier case. Equation (1) is a first-order linear differential equation that can be solved as an initial value problem.
It is argued that the Schrödinger equation does not yield a correct description of the quantum-mechanical time evolution of states of isolated (open) systems featuring events. A precise general law for the time evolution of states replacing the Schrödinger equation is formulated within the so-called ETH-Approach to Quantum Mechanics. This law eliminates the infamous "measurement problem." Our general results are illustrated by an analysis of simple models describing a very heavy atom coupled to the quantized radiation field in a limit where the speed of light tends to infinity. The discussion of these models is the main subject of our paper.
Sean Carroll’s July Quick Study, “Addressing the quantum measurement problem” (page 62), brings up the following question: Does the wavefunction still obey the Schrödinger equation when a measurement is made? A system being measured (or interacting with its environment in any other way) is actually a subsystem, and a subsystem is properly described by a reduced density matrix. The density matrix for an entire system corresponds to a wavefunction—that is, to a pure state—but the density matrix for a subsystem does not necessarily correspond to a wavefunction. The reduced density matrix of a subsystem may correspond to an impure state, also called a mixture or an incoherent combination,11. A. Bohm, Quantum Mechanics: Foundations and Applications, 3rd ed., Springer (1993), p. 72. which does not have well-defined pure-state content.22. See, for example, L. E. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development, 2nd ed., World Scientific (2015), chap. 2. In the words of Kurt Gottfried and Tung-Mow Yan, “systems in the real world are rarely in pure states.”33. K. Gottfried, T.-M. Yan, Quantum Mechanics: Fundamentals, 2nd ed., Springer (2003), p. 46.The proper way to discuss a measurement is not using a wavefunction but rather a reduced density matrix. The density matrix of a pure state evolves according to the Liouville–von Neumann equation, which is equivalent to the unitary evolution of the wavefunction by the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. For a subsystem (that is, for any system except the entire universe), the reduced density matrix evolves according to the nonunitary Liouville–von Neumann equation, which has an additional contribution causing decoherence and dissipation.44. See, for example, D. A. Micha, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 80, 394 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-461X(2000)80:3<394::AID-QUA9>3.0.CO;2-U The nature of the measurement—or, more generally, the nature of the subsystem–environment interaction—selects a preferred basis, called the pointer basis, and the subsystem decoheres into an effectively classical mixture in the pointer basis. (See the article by Wojciech Zurek, Physics Today, October 1991, page 36.)ReferencesSection:ChooseTop of pageReferences <<1. A. Bohm, Quantum Mechanics: Foundations and Applications, 3rd ed., Springer (1993), p. 72. Google Scholar2. See, for example, L. E. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development, 2nd ed., World Scientific (2015), chap. 2. Google Scholar3. K. Gottfried, T.-M. Yan, Quantum Mechanics: Fundamentals, 2nd ed., Springer (2003), p. 46. Google ScholarCrossref4. See, for example, D. A. Micha, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 80, 394 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-461X(2000)80:3<394::AID-QUA9>3.0.CO;2-U, Google ScholarCrossref© 2022 American Institute of Physics.