Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Quasi-particle population of superconducting islands probed by quantum jumps of a fluxonium qubit

Ioan M. Pop, Uri Vool, Katrina Sliwa, Baleegh Abdo, T. Brecht, Robert J. Schoelkopf, Mazyar Mirrahimi, L. I. Glazman, Michel Devoret

Published Mar 5, 2014• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Quantum jumps of a fluxonium qubit

Uri Vool, Ioan M. Pop, Katrina Sliwa +8 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 5, 2014•0 citations

Spectroscopy and decoherence of plasmons and fluxons in superconducting fluxonium qubit

Long B. Nguyen, Yen‐Hsiang Lin, Nicholas Grabon +2 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 17, 2016•0 citations

Non-Poissonian Quantum Jumps of a Fluxonium Qubit due to Quasiparticle Excitations

Uri Vool, Ioan M. Pop, Katrina Sliwa +12 more

As the energy relaxation time of superconducting qubits steadily improves, nonequilibrium quasiparticle excitations above the superconducting gap emerge as an increasingly relevant limit for qubit coherence. We measure fluctuations in the number of quasiparticle excitations by continuously monitoring the spontaneous quantum jumps between the states of a fluxonium qubit, in conditions where relaxation is dominated by quasiparticle loss. Resolution on the scale of a single quasiparticle is obtained by performing quantum nondemolition projective measurements within a time interval much shorter than T₁, using a quantum-limited amplifier (Josephson parametric converter). The quantum jump statistics switches between the expected Poisson distribution and a non-Poissonian one, indicating large relative fluctuations in the quasiparticle population, on time scales varying from seconds to hours. This dynamics can be modified controllably by injecting quasiparticles or by seeding quasiparticle-trapping vortices by cooling down in a magnetic field.

arXiv:1406.1769•Physical Review Letters•Dec 8, 2014•142 citations

On the Quantum Measurement of Superconducting Flux Qubits

Thomas Picot

•Sep 22, 2010•0 citations

Decoherence and Dephasing Rates of the Fluxonium Qubit Under the Influence of Charge Noise

Aakash Lakshmanan

Quantum computing provides significantly more efficient methods than classical computers for doing rigorous calculations such as encryption, search algorithms, and physical simulations. This is accomplished through the use of qubits which exist in a superposition of multiple states at once allowing for both complex and fast calculations. Environmental fluctuations interfere with these states and resulting in decoherence and dephasing and the break down of the algorithm. One type of qubit is the fluxonium: a superconducting artificial atom derived from the Cooper pair box. The purpose of this project was to analyze the effect of charge noise on the fluxonium qubit which, in the past, has never systematically been done before. Charge noise enters the qubit in the form of 1/f noise resulting in interference with the Cooper pairs, two loosely bound electrons, hopping between the superconducting island and reservoir. A program was developed to simulate the qubit's state over time by solving a stochastic differential Schrodinger equation numerically. The program simulated the noise by using its 1/f power spectrum. Looking into the both its wavefunction and density matrix, its dephasing and decoherence rates were determined for different inductive, capacitive, and Josephson energies. Results will be presented.

•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

Measurement and control of quasiparticle dynamics in a superconducting qubit

Chen Wang, Yvonne Y. Gao, Ioan M. Pop +9 more

arXiv:1406.7300•Nature Communications•Dec 18, 2014•229 citations
As the energy relaxation time of superconducting qubits steadily improves, nonequilibrium quasiparticle excitations above the superconducting gap emerge as an increasingly relevant limit for qubit coherence. We measure fluctuations in the number of quasiparticle excitations by continuously monitoring the spontaneous quantum jumps between the states of a fluxonium qubit, in conditions where relaxation is dominated by quasiparticle loss. Resolution on the scale of a single quasiparticle is obtained by performing quantum nondemolition projective measurements within a time interval much shorter than T₁, using a quantum-limited amplifier (Josephson parametric converter). The quantum jump statistics switches between the expected Poisson distribution and a non-Poissonian one, indicating large relative fluctuations in the quasiparticle population, on time scales varying from seconds to hours. This dynamics can be modified controllably by injecting quasiparticles or by seeding quasiparticle-trapping vortices by cooling down in a magnetic field.
Quantum computing provides significantly more efficient methods than classical computers for doing rigorous calculations such as encryption, search algorithms, and physical simulations. This is accomplished through the use of qubits which exist in a superposition of multiple states at once allowing for both complex and fast calculations. Environmental fluctuations interfere with these states and resulting in decoherence and dephasing and the break down of the algorithm. One type of qubit is the fluxonium: a superconducting artificial atom derived from the Cooper pair box. The purpose of this project was to analyze the effect of charge noise on the fluxonium qubit which, in the past, has never systematically been done before. Charge noise enters the qubit in the form of 1/f noise resulting in interference with the Cooper pairs, two loosely bound electrons, hopping between the superconducting island and reservoir. A program was developed to simulate the qubit's state over time by solving a stochastic differential Schrodinger equation numerically. The program simulated the noise by using its 1/f power spectrum. Looking into the both its wavefunction and density matrix, its dephasing and decoherence rates were determined for different inductive, capacitive, and Josephson energies. Results will be presented.