Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quasiparticles in superconducting qubits - theory & experiments

Gianluigi Catelani

Published Jan 1, 2015• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Experiments on Interaction of Quasiparticles with Two-Level-Systems in a Superconducting Phase Qubit

Alexander Bilmes, Juergen Lisenfeld, Andreas Heimes +3 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 2, 2015•0 citations

Measuring and controlling quasiparticles in superconducting qubits

Gianluigi Catelani

•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

Measurement and control of quasiparticle dynamics in a superconducting qubit

Chen Wang, Yvonne Y. Gao, Ioan M. Pop +9 more

arXiv:1406.7300•Nature Communications•Dec 18, 2014•229 citations

Pure dephasing from quasiparticle tunneling in superconducting qubits

Gianluigi Catelani

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 2, 2012•0 citations

A phenomenological model for tunneling rate of nonequilibrium quasiparticles in superconducting qubits

Mohammad H. Ansari

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 5, 2015•0 citations

Quasiparticle-induced transitions in a fluxonium qubit

Maksim Litskevich, Kesavan Manivannan, Benjamin Byrd +4 more

Quasiparticles are a prominent decoherence source in superconducting qubits, but their effects are notoriously difficult to isolate in fluxonium. Unlike the transmon, fluxonium is insensitive to offset charge, precluding charge-parity detection of quasiparticle tunneling. We address this challenge by measuring the excitation and de-excitation rates in a fluxonium qubit under controlled on-chip quasiparticle injection and isolating the quasiparticle-induced contribution by subtracting the background transition rates. We show that to accurately model the external magnetic flux dependence of the quasiparticle-induced transition rates, it is necessary to account for the superconducting gap asymmetry across the Josephson junctions. A comparison between theory and experiment constrains the relative quasiparticle densities in the small junction and the junction array and helps explain previously reported discrepancies between the bounds on the quasiparticle densities inferred for these two circuit elements.

quant-pharXiv:2607.21329•Jul 24, 2026•0 citations
Quasiparticles are a prominent decoherence source in superconducting qubits, but their effects are notoriously difficult to isolate in fluxonium. Unlike the transmon, fluxonium is insensitive to offset charge, precluding charge-parity detection of quasiparticle tunneling. We address this challenge by measuring the excitation and de-excitation rates in a fluxonium qubit under controlled on-chip quasiparticle injection and isolating the quasiparticle-induced contribution by subtracting the background transition rates. We show that to accurately model the external magnetic flux dependence of the quasiparticle-induced transition rates, it is necessary to account for the superconducting gap asymmetry across the Josephson junctions. A comparison between theory and experiment constrains the relative quasiparticle densities in the small junction and the junction array and helps explain previously reported discrepancies between the bounds on the quasiparticle densities inferred for these two circuit elements.