Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Fault-tolerent Holonomic Quantum Computation Based on Stabilizer Codes

Yi-Cong Zheng, Todd A. Brun

Published Mar 19, 2013• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Quantum Error Correction: Fault tolerance for holonomic quantum computation

Ognyan Oreshkov, Todd A. Brun, Daniel A. Lidar

arXiv:1312.0165•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

Scheme for fault-tolerant holonomic computation on stabilizer codes

Ognyan Oreshkov, Todd A. Brun, Daniel A. Lidar

This paper generalizes and expands upon the work [O. Oreshkov, T. A. Brun, and D. A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 070502 (2009)] where we introduced a scheme for fault-tolerant holonomic quantum computation (HQC) on stabilizer codes. HQC is an all-geometric strategy based on non-Abelian adiabatic holonomies, which is known to be robust against various types of errors in the control parameters. The scheme we present shows that HQC is a scalable method of computation and opens the possibility for combining the benefits of error correction with the inherent resilience of the holonomic approach. We show that with the Bacon-Shor code the scheme can be implemented using Hamiltonian operators of weights 2 and 3.

arXiv:0904.2143•Physical Review A•Aug 19, 2009•18 citations

Fault-tolerant scheme of holonomic quantum computation on stabilizer codes with robustness to low-weight thermal noise

Yi-Cong Zheng, Todd A. Brun

We show an equivalence relation between fault-tolerant circuits for a stabilizer code and fault-tolerant adiabatic processes for holonomic quantum computation (HQC), in the case where quantum information is encoded in the degenerate ground space of the system Hamiltonian. By this equivalence, we can systematically construct a fault-tolerant HQC scheme, which can geometrically implement a universal set of encoded quantum gates by adiabatically deforming the system Hamiltonian. During this process, quantum information is protected from low-weight thermal excitations by an energy gap that does not change with the problem size.

arXiv:1309.1534•Physical Review A•Mar 12, 2014•13 citations

Stability of holonomic quantum computations

В. И. Кувшинов, A.V Kuzmin

arXiv:quant-ph/0310069•Physics Letters A•Sep 12, 2003•29 citations

Fault tolerance for holonomic quantum computation

Ognyan Oreshkov, Todd A. Brun, Daniel A. Lidar

In Chapter 16 it was shown how holonomic quantum computation (HQC) can be combined with the method of decoherence-free subspaces (DFSs), leading to passive protection against certain types of correlated errors. However, this is not enough for fault tolerance since other types of errors can accumulate detrimentally unless corrected. Scalability of HQC therefore requires going beyond that scheme, e.g., by combining the holonomic approach with active error correction. One way of combining HQC with active quantum error-correcting codes, which is similar to the way HQC is combined with DFSs, was also mentioned in Chapter 16. This approach, however, is not scalable since it requires Hamiltonians that commute with the stabilizer elements, and when the code increases in size, this necessitates couplings that become increasingly nonlocal. In this chapter, we will show how HQC can be made fault tolerant by combining it with the techniques for fault-tolerant quantum error correction (FTQEC) on stabilizer codes using Hamiltonians of finite locality. The fact that the holonomic method can be mapped directly to the circuit model allows us to construct procedures that resort almost entirely to these techniques. We will discuss an approach that makes use of the encoding already present in a stabilizer code and does not require additional qubits [O08, OBL08]. An alternative approach, which requires ancillary qubits for implementing transversal operations between qubits in the code, can be found in [O09].

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 5, 2013•1 citation

Holonomic quantum computation

Paolo Zanardi A, Mario Rasetti

arXiv:quant-ph/9904011•Physics Letters A•Dec 1, 1999•1,006 citations
This paper generalizes and expands upon the work [O. Oreshkov, T. A. Brun, and D. A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 070502 (2009)] where we introduced a scheme for fault-tolerant holonomic quantum computation (HQC) on stabilizer codes. HQC is an all-geometric strategy based on non-Abelian adiabatic holonomies, which is known to be robust against various types of errors in the control parameters. The scheme we present shows that HQC is a scalable method of computation and opens the possibility for combining the benefits of error correction with the inherent resilience of the holonomic approach. We show that with the Bacon-Shor code the scheme can be implemented using Hamiltonian operators of weights 2 and 3.
We show an equivalence relation between fault-tolerant circuits for a stabilizer code and fault-tolerant adiabatic processes for holonomic quantum computation (HQC), in the case where quantum information is encoded in the degenerate ground space of the system Hamiltonian. By this equivalence, we can systematically construct a fault-tolerant HQC scheme, which can geometrically implement a universal set of encoded quantum gates by adiabatically deforming the system Hamiltonian. During this process, quantum information is protected from low-weight thermal excitations by an energy gap that does not change with the problem size.
In Chapter 16 it was shown how holonomic quantum computation (HQC) can be combined with the method of decoherence-free subspaces (DFSs), leading to passive protection against certain types of correlated errors. However, this is not enough for fault tolerance since other types of errors can accumulate detrimentally unless corrected. Scalability of HQC therefore requires going beyond that scheme, e.g., by combining the holonomic approach with active error correction. One way of combining HQC with active quantum error-correcting codes, which is similar to the way HQC is combined with DFSs, was also mentioned in Chapter 16. This approach, however, is not scalable since it requires Hamiltonians that commute with the stabilizer elements, and when the code increases in size, this necessitates couplings that become increasingly nonlocal. In this chapter, we will show how HQC can be made fault tolerant by combining it with the techniques for fault-tolerant quantum error correction (FTQEC) on stabilizer codes using Hamiltonians of finite locality. The fact that the holonomic method can be mapped directly to the circuit model allows us to construct procedures that resort almost entirely to these techniques. We will discuss an approach that makes use of the encoding already present in a stabilizer code and does not require additional qubits [O08, OBL08]. An alternative approach, which requires ancillary qubits for implementing transversal operations between qubits in the code, can be found in [O09].