Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum violation of the equivalence principle and gravitationally modfied de Broglie relation

Dharam Vir Ahluwalia

Published Feb 1, 2000• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

The agreement between the predictions of general relativity and observations of the energy loss due to gravitational waves emitted by binary pulsars is just as impressive as the agreement between prediction of quantum electrodynamics and the measured value of Lamb shift in atoms. However, general relativity has not yet yielded to a successful quantised theory. There is a widespread belief that the two thories are incompatible at some deep level. The question is: where? Here, I show that the conceptual foundations of the theory of general relativity and quantum mechanics are so rich that they suggest concrete modifications into each other in the interface region. Specifically, I consider quantum states that have no classical counterpart and show that such states must carry an inherent violation of the principle of equivalence. On the other hand, I show that when gravitational effects are incorporated into the quantum measurement process one must induce a gravitationally induced modification to the de Broglie's wave-particle duality. The reported changes into the foundations of the two theories are far from in-principle modifications. These are endowed with serious implications for the understanding of the early universe and, in certain instances, can be explored in terrestrial laboratories.

Related papers

Unification of General Relativity and Quantum Theory by the Free Dirac Equation

Rajan Dogra

“Despite almost a century’s worth of study, it is still unclear how general relativity (GR) and quantum theory (QT) should be unified into a consistent theory. The conventional approach is to retain the foundational principles of QT, such as the superposition principle, and modify GR. This is referred to as ‘quantizing gravity’, resulting in a theory of ‘quantum gravity’. The opposite approach is ‘gravitizing QT’ where we attempt to keep the principles of GR, such as the equivalence principle, and consider how this leads to modifications of QT. What we are most lacking in understanding which route to take, if either, is experimental guidance. Here we consider using the Dirac–Pauli representation of free Dirac equation to search for the clues. In particular, we study how the double-slit diffraction experiment, when only one Dirac particle (‘say’ electron) at a time is in the apparatus, could test a gravitizing QT proposal in which the wavefunction collapse emerges on the detector screen from the Dirac–Pauli representation, as an objective process, resolving the measurement problem of QT.” [1] We found that the Dirac–Pauli representation is inherently a unified theory embodying a gravitizing QT proposal that Dirac–Pauli representation as wave nature is manifestation of inertial mass and the Foldy-Wouthuysen representation as particle nature is manifestation of gravitational mass such that the fact, that same physics is involved in these two representations, is simply the validity and exhibition of the principle of equivalence, of GR, in QT. [1] Richard Howl et al 2019 New J. Phys. 21 043047 DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/ab104a

•Feb 28, 2025•0 citations

Theoretical approach to high-precision atom interferometry

Christian Ufrecht

The wave properties of matter in quantum mechanics first postulated by de Broglie in 1923 as well as Einstein’s theory of general relativity have radically changed our perception of the world at the beginning of the twentieth century. While each theory is extremely successful and well tested within its range of validity, a unification of both theories has so far resisted any attempt. However, the advances in precision of modern matter-wave interferometers have paved the way to designing experiments at the interface of gravity and quantum mechanics. Indeed, quantum mechanical devices are on the brink of becoming sensitive enough to challenge predictions of general relativity such as the weak equivalence principle or set bounds on alternative gravitational theories. Reaching sensitivities required for these experiments necessitates a careful assessment of deleterious effects some of which might be atom-atom interactions or the influence of the gravitational potential of the laboratory setup itself. Estimation of the size of such effects calls for refined theoretical tools for the description of light-pulse atom interferometry which is the subject of the present thesis.

•Jan 1, 2019•7 citations

General relativistic effects on quantum interference and the principle of equivalence

Kamal Kanti Nandi, Yuan‐Zhong Zhang

Using a novel approach, we work out the general relativistic effects on the quantum interference of de Broglie waves associated with thermal neutrons. The unified general formula is consistent with special relativistic results in the flat space limit. It is also shown that the exact geodesic equation contains in a natural way a gravitational analogue of the Aharonov-Bohm effect. We work out two examples, one in general relativity and the other in heterotic string theory, in order to obtain the first order gravitational correction terms to the quantum fringe shift. Measurement of these terms is closely related to the validity of the equivalence principle at a quantum level.

arXiv:gr-qc/0208050•Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Sep 12, 2002•16 citations

Universal Decoherence under Gravity: A Perspective through the Equivalence Principle

Belinda Pang, Yanbei Chen, Farid Ya Khalili

Pikovski et al. [Nat. Phys. 11, 668 (2015)] show that a composite particle prepared in a pure initial quantum state and propagated in a uniform gravitational field undergoes a decoherence process at a rate determined by the gravitational acceleration. By assuming Einstein's equivalence principle to be valid, we analyze a physical realization of the (1+1)D thought experiment of Pikovski et al. to demonstrate that the dephasing between the different internal states arises not from gravity but rather from differences in their rest mass, and the mass dependence of the de Broglie wave's dispersion relation. We provide an alternative view to the situation considered by Pikovski et al., where we propose that gravity plays a kinematic role by providing a relative velocity to the detector frame with respect to the particle; visibility can be easily recovered by giving the screen an appropriate uniform velocity. We then apply this insight to their thought experiment in (1+1)D to draw a direct correspondence, and obtain the same mathematical result for dephasing. We finally propose that dephasing due to gravity may in fact take place for certain modifications to the gravitational potential where the equivalence principle is violated.

arXiv:1603.01984•Physical Review Letters•Aug 24, 2016•37 citations

Quantum mechanics and the equivalence principle

P. C. W. Davies

A quantum particle moving in a gravitational field may penetrate the classically forbidden region of the gravitational potential. This raises the question of whether the time of flight of a quantum particle in a gravitational field might deviate systematically from that of a classical particle due to tunnelling delay, representing a violation of the weak equivalence principle. I investigate this using a model quantum clock to measure the time of flight of a quantum particle in a uniform gravitational field, and show that a violation of the equivalence principle does not occur when the measurement is made far from the turning point of the classical trajectory. I conclude with some remarks about the strong equivalence principle in quantum mechanics.

•Jan 1, 2004•31 citations

Quantum mechanics and the equivalence principle

P C W Davies

A quantum particle moving in a gravitational field may penetrate the classically forbidden region of the gravitational potential. This raises the question of whether the time of flight of a quantum particle in a gravitational field might deviate systematically from that of a classical particle due to tunnelling delay, representing a violation of the weak equivalence principle. I investigate this using a model quantum clock to measure the time of flight of a quantum particle in a uniform gravitational field, and show that a violation of the equivalence principle does not occur when the measurement is made far from the turning point of the classical trajectory. I conclude with some remarks about the strong equivalence principle in quantum mechanics.

arXiv:quant-ph/0403027•Classical and Quantum Gravity•May 6, 2004•65 citations
The agreement between the predictions of general relativity and observations of the energy loss due to gravitational waves emitted by binary pulsars is just as impressive as the agreement between prediction of quantum electrodynamics and the measured value of Lamb shift in atoms. However, general relativity has not yet yielded to a successful quantised theory. There is a widespread belief that the two thories are incompatible at some deep level. The question is: where? Here, I show that the conceptual foundations of the theory of general relativity and quantum mechanics are so rich that they suggest concrete modifications into each other in the interface region. Specifically, I consider quantum states that have no classical counterpart and show that such states must carry an inherent violation of the principle of equivalence. On the other hand, I show that when gravitational effects are incorporated into the quantum measurement process one must induce a gravitationally induced modification to the de Broglie's wave-particle duality. The reported changes into the foundations of the two theories are far from in-principle modifications. These are endowed with serious implications for the understanding of the early universe and, in certain instances, can be explored in terrestrial laboratories.
“Despite almost a century’s worth of study, it is still unclear how general relativity (GR) and quantum theory (QT) should be unified into a consistent theory. The conventional approach is to retain the foundational principles of QT, such as the superposition principle, and modify GR. This is referred to as ‘quantizing gravity’, resulting in a theory of ‘quantum gravity’. The opposite approach is ‘gravitizing QT’ where we attempt to keep the principles of GR, such as the equivalence principle, and consider how this leads to modifications of QT. What we are most lacking in understanding which route to take, if either, is experimental guidance. Here we consider using the Dirac–Pauli representation of free Dirac equation to search for the clues. In particular, we study how the double-slit diffraction experiment, when only one Dirac particle (‘say’ electron) at a time is in the apparatus, could test a gravitizing QT proposal in which the wavefunction collapse emerges on the detector screen from the Dirac–Pauli representation, as an objective process, resolving the measurement problem of QT.” [1] We found that the Dirac–Pauli representation is inherently a unified theory embodying a gravitizing QT proposal that Dirac–Pauli representation as wave nature is manifestation of inertial mass and the Foldy-Wouthuysen representation as particle nature is manifestation of gravitational mass such that the fact, that same physics is involved in these two representations, is simply the validity and exhibition of the principle of equivalence, of GR, in QT. [1] Richard Howl et al 2019 New J. Phys. 21 043047 DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/ab104a
The wave properties of matter in quantum mechanics first postulated by de Broglie in 1923 as well as Einstein’s theory of general relativity have radically changed our perception of the world at the beginning of the twentieth century. While each theory is extremely successful and well tested within its range of validity, a unification of both theories has so far resisted any attempt. However, the advances in precision of modern matter-wave interferometers have paved the way to designing experiments at the interface of gravity and quantum mechanics. Indeed, quantum mechanical devices are on the brink of becoming sensitive enough to challenge predictions of general relativity such as the weak equivalence principle or set bounds on alternative gravitational theories. Reaching sensitivities required for these experiments necessitates a careful assessment of deleterious effects some of which might be atom-atom interactions or the influence of the gravitational potential of the laboratory setup itself. Estimation of the size of such effects calls for refined theoretical tools for the description of light-pulse atom interferometry which is the subject of the present thesis.
Using a novel approach, we work out the general relativistic effects on the quantum interference of de Broglie waves associated with thermal neutrons. The unified general formula is consistent with special relativistic results in the flat space limit. It is also shown that the exact geodesic equation contains in a natural way a gravitational analogue of the Aharonov-Bohm effect. We work out two examples, one in general relativity and the other in heterotic string theory, in order to obtain the first order gravitational correction terms to the quantum fringe shift. Measurement of these terms is closely related to the validity of the equivalence principle at a quantum level.
Pikovski et al. [Nat. Phys. 11, 668 (2015)] show that a composite particle prepared in a pure initial quantum state and propagated in a uniform gravitational field undergoes a decoherence process at a rate determined by the gravitational acceleration. By assuming Einstein's equivalence principle to be valid, we analyze a physical realization of the (1+1)D thought experiment of Pikovski et al. to demonstrate that the dephasing between the different internal states arises not from gravity but rather from differences in their rest mass, and the mass dependence of the de Broglie wave's dispersion relation. We provide an alternative view to the situation considered by Pikovski et al., where we propose that gravity plays a kinematic role by providing a relative velocity to the detector frame with respect to the particle; visibility can be easily recovered by giving the screen an appropriate uniform velocity. We then apply this insight to their thought experiment in (1+1)D to draw a direct correspondence, and obtain the same mathematical result for dephasing. We finally propose that dephasing due to gravity may in fact take place for certain modifications to the gravitational potential where the equivalence principle is violated.
A quantum particle moving in a gravitational field may penetrate the classically forbidden region of the gravitational potential. This raises the question of whether the time of flight of a quantum particle in a gravitational field might deviate systematically from that of a classical particle due to tunnelling delay, representing a violation of the weak equivalence principle. I investigate this using a model quantum clock to measure the time of flight of a quantum particle in a uniform gravitational field, and show that a violation of the equivalence principle does not occur when the measurement is made far from the turning point of the classical trajectory. I conclude with some remarks about the strong equivalence principle in quantum mechanics.
A quantum particle moving in a gravitational field may penetrate the classically forbidden region of the gravitational potential. This raises the question of whether the time of flight of a quantum particle in a gravitational field might deviate systematically from that of a classical particle due to tunnelling delay, representing a violation of the weak equivalence principle. I investigate this using a model quantum clock to measure the time of flight of a quantum particle in a uniform gravitational field, and show that a violation of the equivalence principle does not occur when the measurement is made far from the turning point of the classical trajectory. I conclude with some remarks about the strong equivalence principle in quantum mechanics.