Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Classification of Topological Insulators and Superconductors: the ``Ten-Fold Way''

Andreas W. W. Ludwig

Published Mar 25, 2011• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

AZ classification for topological insulators and superconductors : case study

Jin Ming Yao

•Jan 1, 2015•0 citations

Topological phases: classification of topological insulators and superconductors of non-interacting fermions, and beyond

Andreas W W Ludwig

After briefly recalling the quantum entanglement-based view of topological phases of matter in order to outline the general context, we give an overview of different approaches to the classification problem of topological insulators and superconductors of non-interacting Fermions. In particular, we review in some detail general symmetry aspects of the "ten-fold way" which forms the foundation of the classification, and put different approaches to the classification in relationship with each other. We end by briefly mentioning some of the results obtained on the effect of interactions, mainly in three spatial dimensions.

arXiv:1512.08882•Physica Scripta•Dec 31, 2015•144 citations

Interacting Topological Phases

Tudor D. Stanescu

The “ten-fold way” underlying the classification of nonin- teracting topological insulators and superconductors maps the infrastructure of the “civilized” part of the topological world. With interactions, we step into the wild. The main challenges that stem from the presence of interactions can be organized into three categories. The first set of problems is generated by the lack of a general classification of interacting topological phases (i.e., the interacting analog of the “ten-fold way”), which could be used as the basis for a systematic understanding of these quantum states. Moreover, it is not even clear what type of mathematical structure should underlie such a classification. Nonetheless, significant progress has been made in the past few years involving partial classifications of certain types of interacting topological states based on tensor categories [ 512 ], group cohomology theory [ 98 , 226 ], cobordism [ 276 ], and other “scary mathematical beasts.”

CRC Press eBooks•May 3, 2024•0 citations

Field-Theory Foundations of Topological Insulators

Xiao-Liang Qi

Contemporary concepts of condensed matter science•Jan 1, 2013•7 citations

Simplified topological invariants for interacting insulators and superconductors

Zhong Wang

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 21, 2013•0 citations

Topological Quantum Computation

Tudor D. Stanescu

T he “ten-fold way” underlying the classification of non-interacting topological insulators and superconductors maps the infras- tructure of the “civilized” part of the topological world. With interactions, we step into the wild. The main challenges that stem from the presence of interactions can be organized into three categories. The first set of problems is generated by the lack of a general classification of interacting topological phases (i.e., the interacting analog of the “ten-fold way”), which could be used as the basis for a systematic understanding of these quantum states. Moreover, it is not even clear what type of mathematical structure should underlie such a classification. Nonetheless, significant progress has been made in the past few years involving partial classifications of certain types of interacting topological states based on tensor categories [429], group cohomology theory [82, 200], cobordism [246], and other “scary mathematical beasts.”

CRC Press eBooks•Dec 13, 2016•12 citations
After briefly recalling the quantum entanglement-based view of topological phases of matter in order to outline the general context, we give an overview of different approaches to the classification problem of topological insulators and superconductors of non-interacting Fermions. In particular, we review in some detail general symmetry aspects of the "ten-fold way" which forms the foundation of the classification, and put different approaches to the classification in relationship with each other. We end by briefly mentioning some of the results obtained on the effect of interactions, mainly in three spatial dimensions.
The “ten-fold way” underlying the classification of nonin- teracting topological insulators and superconductors maps the infrastructure of the “civilized” part of the topological world. With interactions, we step into the wild. The main challenges that stem from the presence of interactions can be organized into three categories. The first set of problems is generated by the lack of a general classification of interacting topological phases (i.e., the interacting analog of the “ten-fold way”), which could be used as the basis for a systematic understanding of these quantum states. Moreover, it is not even clear what type of mathematical structure should underlie such a classification. Nonetheless, significant progress has been made in the past few years involving partial classifications of certain types of interacting topological states based on tensor categories [ 512 ], group cohomology theory [ 98 , 226 ], cobordism [ 276 ], and other “scary mathematical beasts.”
T he “ten-fold way” underlying the classification of non-interacting topological insulators and superconductors maps the infras- tructure of the “civilized” part of the topological world. With interactions, we step into the wild. The main challenges that stem from the presence of interactions can be organized into three categories. The first set of problems is generated by the lack of a general classification of interacting topological phases (i.e., the interacting analog of the “ten-fold way”), which could be used as the basis for a systematic understanding of these quantum states. Moreover, it is not even clear what type of mathematical structure should underlie such a classification. Nonetheless, significant progress has been made in the past few years involving partial classifications of certain types of interacting topological states based on tensor categories [429], group cohomology theory [82, 200], cobordism [246], and other “scary mathematical beasts.”