Cambridge University Press eBooks

From density matrix to geometrical phases

Giampiero V. M. Esposito, Giuseppe Marmo, George Sudarshan

Published Mar 11, 2004• 0 citations

Abstract

The density matrix ρ is defined and its basic properties are derived in detail: ρ is a Hermitian non-negative operator with unit trace, its eigenvalues are non-negative and lie in the closed interval [0, 1]; if ρ is a projector, it projects onto a one-dimensional sub-space, the trace of ρ 2 is ≤ 1, the equality holding only if ρ is a projector. A necessary and sufficient condition for ρ to be a projector is that all vectors in its definition are identical up to a phase. Pure cases are sets that can be described by a state vector, unlike mixtures . The density matrix of a mixture is not a projection operator, and this may be viewed as its distinguishing feature with respect to pure cases. The mean value of an observable can be reexpressed with the help of the density matrix, and a Schrödinger equation for density matrices holds. Last, but not least, pure cases cannot unitarily evolve into mixtures . The applications of the formalism presented in this chapter deal with orientation of spin-½ particles, polarization of pairs of photons, thermal-equilibrium states. In the second part, quantum entanglement is presented, with emphasis on the existence of state vectors for entangled pairs of particles that belong to the tensor product of Hilbert spaces H 1 ⊗ H 2 , but are not of the simple product form ψ 1 ⊗ ψ 2 . The only correct interpretation of such states has a statistical nature, associated to series of repeated measurements performed by two observers on the constituents of the entangled pair. Hidden-variable theories, with the associated Bell inequalities, are introduced, and a way of using entangled quantum states is described which makes it possible to transfer the polarization state of a photon to another photon. This property provides the foundation of the modern investigations of quantum teleportation.

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511610929.014

Related papers

Measuring superpositions

Bruce W. Shore

Cambridge University Press eBooksSep 29, 20110 citations

Phase Space Representations of the Density Operator

Z. Ficek, Mohamed Ridza Wahiddin

Apr 19, 20160 citations

Entangled states

Michel Le Bellac

Cambridge University Press eBooksMar 23, 20060 citations

The Density Matrix Formalism

Bernard d’Espagnat

CRC Press eBooksMar 5, 20181 citation

Introduction to Quantum Theory

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Jul 30, 20200 citations

Quantum Information Theory

Yorick Hardy, Willi-Hans Steeb

Birkhäuser Basel eBooksJan 1, 20018 citations

Cambridge University Press eBooks

From density matrix to geometrical phases

Giampiero V. M. Esposito, Giuseppe Marmo, George Sudarshan

Published Mar 11, 2004• 0 citations

Publisher

Abstract

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511610929.014

Related papers

Measuring superpositions

Bruce W. Shore

The nature of measurements, and their place within quantum theory, has engaged physicists and philosophers for generations [Bra92; Sch03]. Much of that interest centered on variables such as position and momentum of free particles, whose values form a continuum. The present monograph deals with discrete quantum states; the measurements are those required to specify as completely as possible a particular discrete quantum state Ψ or, more generally, a density matrix ρ defined within a finite-dimensional Hilbert space. General remarks General system . At the outset we assume that the possible quantum states are a small number – the N essential states used in formulating the time-dependent Schrödinger equation or specifying the dimensions of the density matrix. To completely characterize a density matrix for such a system we require the N 2 elements. Of these the N diagonal elements are real valued, while the off-diagonal elements of the upper right side are complex conjugates of those on the lower left. Thus with allowance for the requirement of unit trace a total of N 2 – 1 real numbers suffice to completely specify the density matrix. These values must be consistent with the constraints discussed in Sec. 16.6.3. Pure state . If it is known that the system is in a pure state, we require the magnitude and phase of N probability amplitudes. These are constrained by normalization, and so only 2 N –1 real numbers are needed. Out of these 2 N – 1 parameters the overall phase of the statevector is usually not of interest (but see Chap. 20).The nature of measurements, and their place within quantum theory, has engaged physicists and philosophers for generations [Bra92; Sch03]. Much of that interest centered on variables such as position and momentum of free particles, whose values form a continuum. The present monograph deals with discrete quantum states; the measurements are those required to specify as completely as possible a particular discrete quantum state Ψ or, more generally, a density matrix ρ defined within a finite-dimensional Hilbert space. General remarks General system . At the outset we assume that the possible quantum states are a small number – the N essential states used in formulating the time-dependent Schrödinger equation or specifying the dimensions of the density matrix. To completely characterize a density matrix for such a system we require the N 2 elements. Of these the N diagonal elements are real valued, while the off-diagonal elements of the upper right side are complex conjugates of those on the lower left. Thus with allowance for the requirement of unit trace a total of N 2 – 1 real numbers suffice to completely specify the density matrix. These values must be consistent with the constraints discussed in Sec. 16.6.3. Pure state . If it is known that the system is in a pure state, we require the magnitude and phase of N probability amplitudes. These are constrained by normalization, and so only 2 N –1 real numbers are needed. Out of these 2 N – 1 parameters the overall phase of the statevector is usually not of interest (but see Chap. 20).

Cambridge University Press eBooksSep 29, 20110 citations

Phase Space Representations of the Density Operator

Z. Ficek, Mohamed Ridza Wahiddin

In Chapter 4, we introduced the concept of the photon number representation of the electromagnetic (EM) ﬁeld that is based on the number states, the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian of the EM ﬁeld. However, this is not the only possible representation, in fact not always the most convenient. In this chapter, we introduce the concept of phase space representations of a quantum system which is in a state described by the density operator ρˆ. The density operator of a given system encodes classical as well as non-classical (quantum) properties of the system. How to distinguish these two kinds of properties is of basic importance in quantum optics. Therefore, we shall address this issue by using representations of the density operator that are based on the parametric space of complex eigenvalues of the annihilation operator aˆ in a coherent state |α〉. We ﬁrst determine what we mean by the density operator of a quantum system and discuss its basic properties. Next, we introduce diﬀerent representations of the density operator in terms of coherent state projectors |α〉〈α|. The representations show that a state of the EM ﬁeld or of an arbitrary quantum system may be regarded as a mixture of coherent states. Along the way, we will learn how to ﬁnd the P , Q and Wigner representations of the density operator, what are their properties, how to interpret the properties and how to calculate relations between the diﬀerent representations. Most importantly, certain ﬁeld states exhibit non- classical features and these non-classical features can be manifested in the phase space representations. Accordingly, we will learn how the representations are very convenient tools to describe quantum states of simple systems.In Chapter 4, we introduced the concept of the photon number representation of the electromagnetic (EM) ﬁeld that is based on the number states, the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian of the EM ﬁeld. However, this is not the only possible representation, in fact not always the most convenient. In this chapter, we introduce the concept of phase space representations of a quantum system which is in a state described by the density operator ρˆ. The density operator of a given system encodes classical as well as non-classical (quantum) properties of the system. How to distinguish these two kinds of properties is of basic importance in quantum optics. Therefore, we shall address this issue by using representations of the density operator that are based on the parametric space of complex eigenvalues of the annihilation operator aˆ in a coherent state |α〉. We ﬁrst determine what we mean by the density operator of a quantum system and discuss its basic properties. Next, we introduce diﬀerent representations of the density operator in terms of coherent state projectors |α〉〈α|. The representations show that a state of the EM ﬁeld or of an arbitrary quantum system may be regarded as a mixture of coherent states. Along the way, we will learn how to ﬁnd the P , Q and Wigner representations of the density operator, what are their properties, how to interpret the properties and how to calculate relations between the diﬀerent representations. Most importantly, certain ﬁeld states exhibit non- classical features and these non-classical features can be manifested in the phase space representations. Accordingly, we will learn how the representations are very convenient tools to describe quantum states of simple systems.

Apr 19, 20160 citations

Entangled states

Michel Le Bellac

Up to now we have limited ourselves to states of a single particle. In the present chapter we shall introduce the description of two-particle states. Once this case is understood, it will be easy to generalize to any number of particles. States of two (or more) particles lead to very rich configurations called entangled states. A remarkable feature is that two entangled quantum particles, even at arbitrarily large spatial separations, continue to form a single entity and no classical probabilistic model is able to reproduce the correlation between particles. In the first section we shall present the essential mathematical formalism, that of the tensor product. This will permit us in Section 6.2 to describe quantum mixtures using the state operator formalism. Section 6.3 is devoted to the study of important physical consequences like the Bell inequalities and interference experiments involving entangled states, which will lead us to a deeper understanding of quantum physics. Finally, in the last section we shall briefly review applications to measurement theory and quantum information theory. The latter is undergoing rapid development at present and has applications to quantum computing, cryptography, and teleportation. The tensor product of two vector spaces Definition and properties of the tensor product We wish to construct the space of states of two physical systems which we assume initially to be completely independent. Let ℌ N 1 and ℌ M 2 be the spaces of states of the two systems, of dimension N and M , respectively.Up to now we have limited ourselves to states of a single particle. In the present chapter we shall introduce the description of two-particle states. Once this case is understood, it will be easy to generalize to any number of particles. States of two (or more) particles lead to very rich configurations called entangled states. A remarkable feature is that two entangled quantum particles, even at arbitrarily large spatial separations, continue to form a single entity and no classical probabilistic model is able to reproduce the correlation between particles. In the first section we shall present the essential mathematical formalism, that of the tensor product. This will permit us in Section 6.2 to describe quantum mixtures using the state operator formalism. Section 6.3 is devoted to the study of important physical consequences like the Bell inequalities and interference experiments involving entangled states, which will lead us to a deeper understanding of quantum physics. Finally, in the last section we shall briefly review applications to measurement theory and quantum information theory. The latter is undergoing rapid development at present and has applications to quantum computing, cryptography, and teleportation. The tensor product of two vector spaces Definition and properties of the tensor product We wish to construct the space of states of two physical systems which we assume initially to be completely independent. Let ℌ N 1 and ℌ M 2 be the spaces of states of the two systems, of dimension N and M , respectively.

Cambridge University Press eBooksMar 23, 20060 citations

The Density Matrix Formalism

Bernard d’Espagnat

Along with an elementary description of the well-known density matrix formalism and of its application to the description of quantum-statistical ensembles, this chapter includes the proofs of a few propositions that are especially useful for understanding most of the developments. In the new formulation, ensembles are directly described by density matrices, observables are still described by Hermitean operators, and the rules giving the statistical distribution and the mean values of the predicted measurement results are, respectively, expressions. When stated in this manner, the rules of quantum mechanics apply directly not only to pure states but also to mixtures. This is a distinct advantage. In the case of mixtures defined by their density matrices, the new formulation also has another merit. If two proper mixtures are described by the same density matrix, any state vector representing a subensemble of one of these mixtures can be expressed as a linear combination of the state vectors representing the subensembles of the other mixture.Along with an elementary description of the well-known density matrix formalism and of its application to the description of quantum-statistical ensembles, this chapter includes the proofs of a few propositions that are especially useful for understanding most of the developments. In the new formulation, ensembles are directly described by density matrices, observables are still described by Hermitean operators, and the rules giving the statistical distribution and the mean values of the predicted measurement results are, respectively, expressions. When stated in this manner, the rules of quantum mechanics apply directly not only to pure states but also to mixtures. This is a distinct advantage. In the case of mixtures defined by their density matrices, the new formulation also has another merit. If two proper mixtures are described by the same density matrix, any state vector representing a subensemble of one of these mixtures can be expressed as a linear combination of the state vectors representing the subensembles of the other mixture.

CRC Press eBooksMar 5, 20181 citation

Introduction to Quantum Theory

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

This chapter contains a brief introduction to mathematical formalism and QM axiomatics. It is oriented to non-physicists. Since QM is a statistical theory it is natural to start with the classical probability model (Kolmogorov [ 191 ], 1933). Then we present the basics of the theory of Hilbert spaces and Hermitian operators and the representation of pure and mixed states by normalized vectors and density operators. This introduction is sufficient to formulate the axiomatics of QM in the form of five postulates. The projection postulate (the most questionable postulate of QM) is presented in a separate section. We sharply distinguish between the cases of quantum observables represented by Hermitian operators with nondegenerate and degenerate spectra, von Neumann’s and Ltiders’s forms of the projection postulate. The axiomatics is completed by a short section on the main interpretations of QM. The projection postulate (LUders’s form) plays a crucial role in the definition of quantum conditional (transition) probability. By operating with the latter we consider interference of probabilities for two incompatible observables as a modification of the formula of total probability by adding the interference term. This viewpoint to interference of probabilities was elaborated in a series of works by Khrennikov. Since classical probability theory is based on the 142 Boolean algebra of events, a violation of the law of total probability can be treated as the probabilistic sign of a violation of the laws of the Boolean logics. From this viewpoint, quantum theory can be considered as representing a new kind of logic, so-called quantum logic. The latter is also briefly presented in a separate section. We continue this review with a new portion of quantum mathematics, namely the notion of the tensor product of Hilbert spaces and the tensor product of operators. After the section on Dirac’s notation with ket and bra vector, we discuss briefly the notion of qubit and entanglement of a few qubits. This chapter concludes with a presentation of the detailed analysis of the probabilistic structure of the two-slit experiment in a bunch of different experimental contexts. This contextual structure leads to a violation of the law of total probability and non-Kolmogorovean probabilistic structure of this experiment.This chapter contains a brief introduction to mathematical formalism and QM axiomatics. It is oriented to non-physicists. Since QM is a statistical theory it is natural to start with the classical probability model (Kolmogorov [ 191 ], 1933). Then we present the basics of the theory of Hilbert spaces and Hermitian operators and the representation of pure and mixed states by normalized vectors and density operators. This introduction is sufficient to formulate the axiomatics of QM in the form of five postulates. The projection postulate (the most questionable postulate of QM) is presented in a separate section. We sharply distinguish between the cases of quantum observables represented by Hermitian operators with nondegenerate and degenerate spectra, von Neumann’s and Ltiders’s forms of the projection postulate. The axiomatics is completed by a short section on the main interpretations of QM. The projection postulate (LUders’s form) plays a crucial role in the definition of quantum conditional (transition) probability. By operating with the latter we consider interference of probabilities for two incompatible observables as a modification of the formula of total probability by adding the interference term. This viewpoint to interference of probabilities was elaborated in a series of works by Khrennikov. Since classical probability theory is based on the 142 Boolean algebra of events, a violation of the law of total probability can be treated as the probabilistic sign of a violation of the laws of the Boolean logics. From this viewpoint, quantum theory can be considered as representing a new kind of logic, so-called quantum logic. The latter is also briefly presented in a separate section. We continue this review with a new portion of quantum mathematics, namely the notion of the tensor product of Hilbert spaces and the tensor product of operators. After the section on Dirac’s notation with ket and bra vector, we discuss briefly the notion of qubit and entanglement of a few qubits. This chapter concludes with a presentation of the detailed analysis of the probabilistic structure of the two-slit experiment in a bunch of different experimental contexts. This contextual structure leads to a violation of the law of total probability and non-Kolmogorovean probabilistic structure of this experiment.

Jul 30, 20200 citations

Quantum Information Theory

Yorick Hardy, Willi-Hans Steeb

The concepts of classical information theory can be extended to quantum information theory. Since in general measurement yields a result with probability, we may suggest using these probabilities in classical information theory. However the probabilities do not contain phase information, which cannot be neglected. Thus the definitions are given in terms of the density operator. These probabilities depend on the basis used for measurement. A density operator ρ over a n-dimensional Hilbert space H is a positive operator with unit trace. The trace tr(A) is defined as $tr(A): = \sum\limits_{j = 1}^n {\left\langle {{\beta _j}|A|{\beta _j}} \right\rangle }$ where β j for j = 1,..., n is any orthonormal basis in HThus tr(P)=1. The eigenvalues of a density operator are greater than zero. By the spectral theorem every density operator can be represented as a mixture of pure states $\rho = \sum\limits_{j = 1}^n {Pj|} \left\langle {aj} \right.\langle aj|$ where α j for j = 1,..., n are the orthonormal eigenvectors of ρ (which form a basis in H and $pj \in R,{p_j}0,\sum\limits_{j = 1}^n {{p_j}} = 1$ The concepts of classical information theory can be extended to quantum information theory. Since in general measurement yields a result with probability, we may suggest using these probabilities in classical information theory. However the probabilities do not contain phase information, which cannot be neglected. Thus the definitions are given in terms of the density operator. These probabilities depend on the basis used for measurement. A density operator ρ over a n-dimensional Hilbert space H is a positive operator with unit trace. The trace tr(A) is defined as $$tr(A): = \sum\limits_{j = 1}^n {\left\langle {{\beta _j}|A|{\beta _j}} \right\rangle } $$ where β j for j = 1,..., n is any orthonormal basis in HThus tr(P)=1. The eigenvalues of a density operator are greater than zero. By the spectral theorem every density operator can be represented as a mixture of pure states $$\rho = \sum\limits_{j = 1}^n {Pj|} \left\langle {aj} \right.\langle aj|$$ where α j for j = 1,..., n are the orthonormal eigenvectors of ρ (which form a basis in H and $$pj \in R,{p_j}0,\sum\limits_{j = 1}^n {{p_j}} = 1$$

Birkhäuser Basel eBooksJan 1, 20018 citations

tr(A): = \sum\limits_{j = 1}^n {\left\langle {{\beta _j}|A|{\beta _j}} \right\rangle }

where β j for j = 1,..., n is any orthonormal basis in HThus tr(P)=1. The eigenvalues of a density operator are greater than zero. By the spectral theorem every density operator can be represented as a mixture of pure states

\rho = \sum\limits_{j = 1}^n {Pj|} \left\langle {aj} \right.\langle aj|

where α j for j = 1,..., n are the orthonormal eigenvectors of ρ (which form a basis in H and

pj \in R,{p_j}0,\sum\limits_{j = 1}^n {{p_j}} = 1