Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Contemporary mathematics - American Mathematical Society

Entropy and the Quantum II

Robert Sims, Daniel Ueltschi

Published Jan 1, 2011• 22 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1090/conm/552

Related papers

QUANTUM ENTROPIES AND ENTANGLEMENT

Josep Amengual i Batle, M. Casas, Angel Ricardo Plastino +1 more

The nature of quantum entropies, and its use in Quantum Information Theory in the form of (i) total entropy, (ii) relative entropy and (iii) conditional entropy is revisited. In this ordering, we first show the correlations existing between the total q-entropy and entanglement, quantified in the form of entanglement of formation. Then, we revisit the use of the quantum relative entropy as a measure of entanglement, and we finally discuss some features of the quantum conditional q-entropies, which are used in turn as a separability criterion.

International Journal of Quantum Information•Dec 17, 2004•5 citations

Entropy and the Quantum

Robert Sims, Daniel Ueltschi

Contemporary mathematics - American Mathematical Society•Jan 1, 2010•37 citations

Entropy: Part II — Thermodynamics and Perfect Order

Elias P. Gyftopoulos

Abstract Part II of this two-part paper refutes the beliefs about the statistical interpretation of thermodynamics, and the association of entropy with disorder that are summarized in Part I. The refutation of the statistical approach is based on either a nonstatistical unified quantum theory of mechanics and thermodynamics, or an almost equivalent, novel, nonquantal exposition of thermodynamics. Entropy is shown to be: (i) valid for any system (both macroscopic and microscopic, including one-particle systems), and any state (both thermodynamic or stable equilibrium, and not stable equilibrium); (ii) a measure of the quantum-theoretic pliable shape of the molecules of a system; and (iii) a monotonic indicator of order. In contrast to statistics which associates a thermodynamic equilibrium macrostate with the largest number of compatible microstates, the second law avers that, for each set of values of energy, volume, and amounts of constituents of either a macroscopic or a microscopic system, there exists one and only one thermodynamic or stable equilibrium state. So, even if Boltzmann’s definition were used, a thermodynamic equilibrium state is one of perfect order.

ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE)•Nov 14, 1999•0 citations

NOTES ON QUANTUM ENTROPY

Makoto Ohya, D�nes Petz

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Feb 1, 2008•2 citations

Entropies of Statistical Mechanics and Disorder Versus the Entropy of Thermodynamics and Order

Elias P. Gyftopoulos

The prevailing beliefs in the scientific and engineering literature are that: (i) thermodynamics is explained and justified by statistical mechanics; (ii) entropy is a statistical measure of disorder; and (iii) for given values of energy, volume, and amounts of constituents, the largest value of entropy corresponds to both a thermodynamic equilibrium state and the ultimate disorder. In this paper, we provide: (i) a summary of the beliefs as stated by some eminent scientists; (ii) experimental evidence that casts serious doubt about the validity of the beliefs; (iii) an outline of a nonstatistical unified quantum theory of mechanics and thermodynamics; (iv) an outline of a nonquantal, nonstatistical exposition of thermodynamics, valid for all systems (both macroscopic and microscopic), and for all states (both thermodynamic equilibrium and not thermodynamic equilibrium); (v) the definition and analytical expression of the entropy of thermodynamics; (vi) the interpretation of entropy as both a measure of the quantum-theoretic spatial shape of a molecule, and an indicator of order; and (vii) nonstatistical answers to the questions that motivated the introduction of statistical mechanics.

Journal of Energy Resources Technology•Dec 13, 2000•12 citations

A Note on Quantum Entropy

Frank Hansen

arXiv:1511.09189•Mathematical Physics Analysis and Geometry•May 12, 2016•1 citation
The nature of quantum entropies, and its use in Quantum Information Theory in the form of (i) total entropy, (ii) relative entropy and (iii) conditional entropy is revisited. In this ordering, we first show the correlations existing between the total q-entropy and entanglement, quantified in the form of entanglement of formation. Then, we revisit the use of the quantum relative entropy as a measure of entanglement, and we finally discuss some features of the quantum conditional q-entropies, which are used in turn as a separability criterion.
Abstract Part II of this two-part paper refutes the beliefs about the statistical interpretation of thermodynamics, and the association of entropy with disorder that are summarized in Part I. The refutation of the statistical approach is based on either a nonstatistical unified quantum theory of mechanics and thermodynamics, or an almost equivalent, novel, nonquantal exposition of thermodynamics. Entropy is shown to be: (i) valid for any system (both macroscopic and microscopic, including one-particle systems), and any state (both thermodynamic or stable equilibrium, and not stable equilibrium); (ii) a measure of the quantum-theoretic pliable shape of the molecules of a system; and (iii) a monotonic indicator of order. In contrast to statistics which associates a thermodynamic equilibrium macrostate with the largest number of compatible microstates, the second law avers that, for each set of values of energy, volume, and amounts of constituents of either a macroscopic or a microscopic system, there exists one and only one thermodynamic or stable equilibrium state. So, even if Boltzmann’s definition were used, a thermodynamic equilibrium state is one of perfect order.
The prevailing beliefs in the scientific and engineering literature are that: (i) thermodynamics is explained and justified by statistical mechanics; (ii) entropy is a statistical measure of disorder; and (iii) for given values of energy, volume, and amounts of constituents, the largest value of entropy corresponds to both a thermodynamic equilibrium state and the ultimate disorder. In this paper, we provide: (i) a summary of the beliefs as stated by some eminent scientists; (ii) experimental evidence that casts serious doubt about the validity of the beliefs; (iii) an outline of a nonstatistical unified quantum theory of mechanics and thermodynamics; (iv) an outline of a nonquantal, nonstatistical exposition of thermodynamics, valid for all systems (both macroscopic and microscopic), and for all states (both thermodynamic equilibrium and not thermodynamic equilibrium); (v) the definition and analytical expression of the entropy of thermodynamics; (vi) the interpretation of entropy as both a measure of the quantum-theoretic spatial shape of a molecule, and an indicator of order; and (vii) nonstatistical answers to the questions that motivated the introduction of statistical mechanics.