Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Symmetry of the Hamiltonian

‎Louis Marchildon

Published Jan 1, 2002• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-662-04750-7_13

Related papers

Symmetries of ( N × N ) non-Hermitian Hamiltonian matrices

Aitor Alaña, S. Martínez-Garaot, Miguel Angel Otero Simón +1 more

Abstract A non-Abelian group of 16 symmetry operations on (generally) non-Hermitian discrete Hamiltonians represented by matrices is studied. The symmetry operations are described by unitary/antiunitary superoperators that arise when combining three basic generating operations with simple ‘geometric’ interpretations. The corresponding Hamiltonian symmetries occur when the Hamiltonian remains invariant under the superoperator action. These symmetries include PT-symmetry and Hermiticity as particular cases. The interplay between the group of symmetry operations and Hamiltonian symmetries is analyzed systematically by introducing the concepts of equivalent operations and associated symmetries. Spectral properties implied by some of the symmetries are described.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Feb 18, 2020•3 citations

SYMMETRY ELEMENTS OF THE HAMILTONIAN

Mitchel Weissbluth

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1978•0 citations

Symmetries and invariants for non-Hermitian Hamiltonians

Martínez, M. A. Simón, Álvaro Buendía, Juan Gonzalo Muga

We discuss Hamiltonian symmetries and invariants for quantum systems driven by non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. For time-independent Hermitian Hamiltonians, a unitary or antiunitary transformation $AHA^\dagger$ that leaves the Hamiltonian $H$ unchanged represents a symmetry of the Hamiltonian, which implies the commutativity $[H,A]=0$, and a conservation law, namely the invariance of expectation values of $A$. For non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, $H^\dagger$ comes into play as a distinct operator that complements $H$ in generalized unitarity relations. The above description of symmetries has to be extended to include also $A$-pseudohermiticity relations of the form $AH=H^\dagger A$. A superoperator formulation of Hamiltonian symmetries is provided and exemplified for Hamiltonians of a particle moving in one-dimension considering the set of $A$ operators forming Klein's 4-group: parity, time-reversal, parity\&time-reversal, and unity. The link between symmetry and conservation laws is discussed and shown to be more subtle for non-Hermitian than for Hermitian Hamiltonians.

arXiv:1805.04968•May 13, 2018•2 citations

Transformation of the Hamiltonian

Stefan K. Kehrein

Springer tracts in modern physics•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

All Hermitian Hamiltonians have parity

Carl M. Bender, Peter N Meisinger, Qinghai Wang

It is shown that if a Hamiltonian H is Hermitian, then there always exists an operator having the following properties: (i) is linear and Hermitian; (ii) commutes with H ; (iii) 2 = 1; (iv) the n th eigenstate of H is also an eigenstate of with eigenvalue (−1) n . Given these properties, it is appropriate to refer to as the parity operator and to say that H has parity symmetry, even though may not refer to spatial reflection. Thus, if the Hamiltonian has the form H = p 2 + V ( x ), where V ( x ) is real (so that H possesses time-reversal symmetry), then it immediately follows that H has symmetry. This shows that symmetry is a generalization of Hermiticity: all Hermitian Hamiltonians of the form H = p 2 + V ( x ) have symmetry, but not all -symmetric Hamiltonians of this form are Hermitian.

arXiv:quant-ph/0211123•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jan 15, 2003•31 citations

Efficient Identification of Permutation Symmetries in Many-Body Hamiltonians via Graph Theory

Saumya Shah, Patrick Rebentrost

The computational cost of simulating quantum many-body systems can often be reduced by taking advantage of physical symmetries. While methods exist for specific symmetry classes, a general algorithm to find the full permutation symmetry group of an arbitrary Pauli Hamiltonian is notably lacking. This paper introduces a new method that identifies this symmetry group by establishing an isomorphism between the Hamiltonian's permutation symmetry group and the automorphism group of a coloured bipartite graph constructed from the Hamiltonian. We formally prove this isomorphism and show that for physical Hamiltonians with bounded locality and interaction degree, the resulting graph has a bounded degree, reducing the computational problem of finding the automorphism group to polynomial time. The algorithm's validity is empirically confirmed on various physical models with known symmetries. We further show that the problem of deciding whether two Hamiltonians are permutation-equivalent is polynomial-time reducible to the graph isomorphism problem using our graph representation. This work provides a general, structurally exact tool for algorithmic symmetry finding, enabling the scalable application of these symmetries to Hamiltonian simulation problems.

quant-pharXiv:2511.23160•Dec 1, 2025•0 citations
Abstract A non-Abelian group of 16 symmetry operations on (generally) non-Hermitian discrete Hamiltonians represented by matrices is studied. The symmetry operations are described by unitary/antiunitary superoperators that arise when combining three basic generating operations with simple ‘geometric’ interpretations. The corresponding Hamiltonian symmetries occur when the Hamiltonian remains invariant under the superoperator action. These symmetries include PT-symmetry and Hermiticity as particular cases. The interplay between the group of symmetry operations and Hamiltonian symmetries is analyzed systematically by introducing the concepts of equivalent operations and associated symmetries. Spectral properties implied by some of the symmetries are described.
We discuss Hamiltonian symmetries and invariants for quantum systems driven by non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. For time-independent Hermitian Hamiltonians, a unitary or antiunitary transformation AHA†AHA^\daggerAHA† that leaves the Hamiltonian HHH unchanged represents a symmetry of the Hamiltonian, which implies the commutativity [H,A]=0[H,A]=0[H,A]=0, and a conservation law, namely the invariance of expectation values of AAA. For non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, H†H^\daggerH† comes into play as a distinct operator that complements HHH in generalized unitarity relations. The above description of symmetries has to be extended to include also AAA-pseudohermiticity relations of the form AH=H†AAH=H^\dagger AAH=H†A. A superoperator formulation of Hamiltonian symmetries is provided and exemplified for Hamiltonians of a particle moving in one-dimension considering the set of AAA operators forming Klein's 4-group: parity, time-reversal, parity\&time-reversal, and unity. The link between symmetry and conservation laws is discussed and shown to be more subtle for non-Hermitian than for Hermitian Hamiltonians.
It is shown that if a Hamiltonian H is Hermitian, then there always exists an operator having the following properties: (i) is linear and Hermitian; (ii) commutes with H ; (iii) 2 = 1; (iv) the n th eigenstate of H is also an eigenstate of with eigenvalue (−1) n . Given these properties, it is appropriate to refer to as the parity operator and to say that H has parity symmetry, even though may not refer to spatial reflection. Thus, if the Hamiltonian has the form H = p 2 + V ( x ), where V ( x ) is real (so that H possesses time-reversal symmetry), then it immediately follows that H has symmetry. This shows that symmetry is a generalization of Hermiticity: all Hermitian Hamiltonians of the form H = p 2 + V ( x ) have symmetry, but not all -symmetric Hamiltonians of this form are Hermitian.
The computational cost of simulating quantum many-body systems can often be reduced by taking advantage of physical symmetries. While methods exist for specific symmetry classes, a general algorithm to find the full permutation symmetry group of an arbitrary Pauli Hamiltonian is notably lacking. This paper introduces a new method that identifies this symmetry group by establishing an isomorphism between the Hamiltonian's permutation symmetry group and the automorphism group of a coloured bipartite graph constructed from the Hamiltonian. We formally prove this isomorphism and show that for physical Hamiltonians with bounded locality and interaction degree, the resulting graph has a bounded degree, reducing the computational problem of finding the automorphism group to polynomial time. The algorithm's validity is empirically confirmed on various physical models with known symmetries. We further show that the problem of deciding whether two Hamiltonians are permutation-equivalent is polynomial-time reducible to the graph isomorphism problem using our graph representation. This work provides a general, structurally exact tool for algorithmic symmetry finding, enabling the scalable application of these symmetries to Hamiltonian simulation problems.