Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Classical paradoxies for orthodox values: the theorems of Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen, and of Bell

Luis de la Peña, Ana Marı́a Cetto

Published Jan 1, 1974• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

The Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Paradox, Bell’s Theorem and Nonlocality

Douglas L. Hemmick, Asif M. Shakur

SpringerBriefs in physics•Sep 30, 2011•0 citations

On the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Paradox and the Bell’s Theorem

Victor Paromov

This letter attempts to show that the non-classical 5D spacetime geometry-based theory of electromagnetism (http://vixra.org/pdf/1811.0315v2.pdf) is able to preserve both realism and locality for the Bell test thus supporting Einstein’s argument in general. In addition, the theory is able to match the quantum-mechanical (QM) predictions for the correlation. With the above-mentioned theory, the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) paradox may be explained with the assumption that real values do exist, however, are inaccessible in principle due to the compactness of the extra spatial dimension.

•Jun 1, 2019•0 citations

On the Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen Paradox and the Relevant Philosophical Problems

HE ZUO-XIU

Boston studies in the philosophy of science•Jan 1, 1996•0 citations

On the So-Called Paradox of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen

Ernst Breitenberger

Il Nuovo Cimento•Jul 1, 1965•6 citations

Quantum cryptography without Bell’s theorem

Charles H. Bennett, Gilles Brassard A, N. David Mermin

Ekert has described a cryptographic scheme in which Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) pairs of particles are used to generate identical random numbers in remote places, while Bell's theorem certifies that the particles have not been measured in transit by an eavesdropper. We describe a related but simpler EPR scheme and, without invoking Bell's theorem, prove it secure against more general attacks, including substitution of a fake EPR source. Finally we show our scheme is equivalent to the original 1984 key distribution scheme of Bennett and Brassard, which uses single particles instead of EPR pairs.

Physical Review Letters•Feb 3, 1992•2,467 citations

ON THE EINSTEIN PODOLSKY ROSEN PARADOX

J. S. Bell

World Scientific series in 20th century physics•Sep 1, 1995•2 citations
This letter attempts to show that the non-classical 5D spacetime geometry-based theory of electromagnetism (http://vixra.org/pdf/1811.0315v2.pdf) is able to preserve both realism and locality for the Bell test thus supporting Einstein’s argument in general. In addition, the theory is able to match the quantum-mechanical (QM) predictions for the correlation. With the above-mentioned theory, the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) paradox may be explained with the assumption that real values do exist, however, are inaccessible in principle due to the compactness of the extra spatial dimension.
Ekert has described a cryptographic scheme in which Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) pairs of particles are used to generate identical random numbers in remote places, while Bell's theorem certifies that the particles have not been measured in transit by an eavesdropper. We describe a related but simpler EPR scheme and, without invoking Bell's theorem, prove it secure against more general attacks, including substitution of a fake EPR source. Finally we show our scheme is equivalent to the original 1984 key distribution scheme of Bennett and Brassard, which uses single particles instead of EPR pairs.