Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks

The number of independent parameters defining a projector: proof in matrix representation and resolution of previously conflicting arguments

Arnaud J. A. Soirat, Lou Massa

Published Dec 14, 2005• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/0-306-46943-x_8

Related papers

General outline of the projector variation method

A.M.K. Müller

Physics Letters A•Sep 1, 1979•5 citations

Construction of state-independent proofs for quantum contextuality

Weidong Tang, Sixia Yu

Since the enlightening proofs of quantum contextuality first established by Kochen and Specker, and also by Bell, various simplified proofs have been constructed to exclude the noncontextual hidden variable theory of our nature at the microscopic scale. The conflict between the noncontextual hidden variable theory and quantum mechanics is commonly revealed by Kochen-Specker sets of yes-no tests, represented by projectors (or rays), via either logical contradictions or noncontextuality inequalities in a state-(in)dependent manner. Here we propose a systematic and programmable construction of a state-independent proof from a given set of nonspecific rays in ${\mathbb{C}}^{3}$ according to their Gram matrix. This approach brings us a greater convenience in the experimental arrangements. Besides, our proofs in ${\mathbb{C}}^{3}$ can also be generalized to any higher-dimensional systems by a recursive method.

arXiv:1707.05626•Physical Review A•Dec 21, 2017•5 citations

Number of independent parameters needed to define a projector

Arnaud J. A. Soirat, Lou Massa

We answer the question of how many independent experimental measurements (or theoretical conditions) are needed to determine a projector.Received 15 March 1994DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.3392©1994 American Physical Society

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Aug 1, 1994•8 citations

Identical particles, projectors and probabilities

M. Testa

Physics Letters A•Aug 12, 2009•0 citations

The quantum detection of projectors in finite-dimensional algebras and holography

Joseph Ben Geloun, Sanjaye Ramgoolam

Abstract We define the computational task of detecting projectors in finite dimensional associative algebras with a combinatorial basis, labelled by representation theory data, using combinatorial central elements in the algebra. In the first example, the projectors belong to the centre of a symmetric group algebra and are labelled by Young diagrams with a fixed number of boxes n. We describe a quantum algorithm for the task based on quantum phase estimation (QPE) and obtain estimates of the complexity as a function of n. We compare to a classical algorithm related to the projector identification problem by the AdS/CFT correspondence. This gives a concrete proof of concept for classical/quantum comparisons of the complexity of a detection task, based in holographic correspondences. A second example involves projectors labelled by triples of Young diagrams, all having n boxes, with non-vanishing Kronecker coefficient. The task takes as input the projector, and consists of identifying the triple of Young diagrams. In both of the above cases the standard QPE complexities are polynomial in n. A third example of quantum projector detection involves projectors labelled by a triple of Young diagrams, with m, n and m + n boxes respectively, such that the associated Littlewood-Richardson coefficient is non-zero. The projector detection task is to identify the triple of Young diagrams associated with the projector which is given as input. This is motivated by a two-matrix model, related via the AdS/CFT correspondence, to systems of strings attached to giant gravitons. The QPE complexity in this case is polynomial in m and n.

arXiv:2303.12154•Journal of High Energy Physics•May 24, 2023•7 citations

Parametrization of Projector-Based Witnesses for Bipartite Systems

Seyed Javad Akhtarshenas, A. Kheirollahi

arXiv:1003.2702•International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Dec 15, 2009•0 citations
Since the enlightening proofs of quantum contextuality first established by Kochen and Specker, and also by Bell, various simplified proofs have been constructed to exclude the noncontextual hidden variable theory of our nature at the microscopic scale. The conflict between the noncontextual hidden variable theory and quantum mechanics is commonly revealed by Kochen-Specker sets of yes-no tests, represented by projectors (or rays), via either logical contradictions or noncontextuality inequalities in a state-(in)dependent manner. Here we propose a systematic and programmable construction of a state-independent proof from a given set of nonspecific rays in C3{\mathbb{C}}^{3}C3 according to their Gram matrix. This approach brings us a greater convenience in the experimental arrangements. Besides, our proofs in C3{\mathbb{C}}^{3}C3 can also be generalized to any higher-dimensional systems by a recursive method.
Abstract We define the computational task of detecting projectors in finite dimensional associative algebras with a combinatorial basis, labelled by representation theory data, using combinatorial central elements in the algebra. In the first example, the projectors belong to the centre of a symmetric group algebra and are labelled by Young diagrams with a fixed number of boxes n. We describe a quantum algorithm for the task based on quantum phase estimation (QPE) and obtain estimates of the complexity as a function of n. We compare to a classical algorithm related to the projector identification problem by the AdS/CFT correspondence. This gives a concrete proof of concept for classical/quantum comparisons of the complexity of a detection task, based in holographic correspondences. A second example involves projectors labelled by triples of Young diagrams, all having n boxes, with non-vanishing Kronecker coefficient. The task takes as input the projector, and consists of identifying the triple of Young diagrams. In both of the above cases the standard QPE complexities are polynomial in n. A third example of quantum projector detection involves projectors labelled by a triple of Young diagrams, with m, n and m + n boxes respectively, such that the associated Littlewood-Richardson coefficient is non-zero. The projector detection task is to identify the triple of Young diagrams associated with the projector which is given as input. This is motivated by a two-matrix model, related via the AdS/CFT correspondence, to systems of strings attached to giant gravitons. The QPE complexity in this case is polynomial in m and n.