Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

What Information Is Leaked under Concurrent Composition?

Vipul Goyal, Divya Gupta, Abhishek Jain

Published Jan 1, 2013• 11 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-40084-1_13

Related papers

Lower Bounds for Concurrent Self Composition

Yehuda Lindell

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2004•109 citations

Local Sequentiality Does Not Help for Concurrent Composition

Andrew Y. Lindell

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Simulatable Security and Polynomially Bounded Concurrent Composition.

Dennis Hofheinz, Dominique Unruh

•Jan 1, 2006•2 citations

Lower Bounds and Impossibility Results for Concurrent Self Composition

Yehuda Lindell

Journal of Cryptology•Sep 27, 2007•38 citations

Concurrent Composition of Secure Protocols in the Timing Model

Yael Tauman Kalai, Yehuda Lindell, Manoj Prabhakaran

Journal of Cryptology•Oct 1, 2007•25 citations

What Information is Leaked under Concurrent Composition

Vipul Goyal, Divya Gupta, Abhishek Jain

A long series of works have established far reaching impossibility results for concurrently secure computation. On the other hand, some positive results have also been obtained according to various weaker notions of security (such as by using a super-polynomial time simulator). This suggest that somehow, “not all is lost in the concurrent setting.” In this work, we ask what and exactly how much private information can an adversary learn by launching a concurrent attack? Inspired by the recent works on leakage-resilient protocols, we consider a security model where the ideal world adversary (a.k.a simulator) is allowed to query the trusted party for some “leakage ” on the honest party inputs. Intuitively, the amount of leakage required by the simulator upper bounds the security loss in the real world. This model generalizes the multiple ideal query model (MIQ) for concurrent security proposed by Goyal, Jain and Ostrovsky [CRYPTO’10]. Positive Results. As our main result, we show, for the first time, how to compute any efficiently computable functionality in the concurrent setting such that full security is guaranteed for “most ” of the sessions. At the heart of this result is a new precise simulation strategy (first

•Jan 1, 2015•2 citations
A long series of works have established far reaching impossibility results for concurrently secure computation. On the other hand, some positive results have also been obtained according to various weaker notions of security (such as by using a super-polynomial time simulator). This suggest that somehow, “not all is lost in the concurrent setting.” In this work, we ask what and exactly how much private information can an adversary learn by launching a concurrent attack? Inspired by the recent works on leakage-resilient protocols, we consider a security model where the ideal world adversary (a.k.a simulator) is allowed to query the trusted party for some “leakage ” on the honest party inputs. Intuitively, the amount of leakage required by the simulator upper bounds the security loss in the real world. This model generalizes the multiple ideal query model (MIQ) for concurrent security proposed by Goyal, Jain and Ostrovsky [CRYPTO’10]. Positive Results. As our main result, we show, for the first time, how to compute any efficiently computable functionality in the concurrent setting such that full security is guaranteed for “most ” of the sessions. At the heart of this result is a new precise simulation strategy (first