Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The frontiers collection

Roger Penrose’s Theory and Quantum Decoherence

Henry Pierce Stapp

Published Jan 1, 2011• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-18076-7_9

Related papers

Roger Penrose’s Theory and Quantum Decoherence

Springer eBooks•Jun 12, 2007•0 citations

Roger Penrose e o limiar da ciência

Nelson Job, Luiz Pinguelli Rosa

In the year 2020, British physicist Roger Penrose was awarded the Nobel Prize. In this article, his main researches will be presented, focusing on his model of quantum consciousness. We show the wide spectrum of his work, as well as his boldness in several aspects related to current research in physics.

•May 14, 2021•0 citations

New approach to quantum decoherence

Nima Arkani-hamed A, John E. Sipe

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference•May 2, 1993•0 citations

Roger Penrose's Theory of Consciousness Through the Lens of the Theory of Axiomatic Necessity (TNA): Objective Reduction versus Failure of Local Closure

Claudio Bresciano

This paper analyzes Roger Penrose’s Orch-OR theory of consciousness through the formal framework of the Theory of Axiomatic Necessity (TNA). By examining Objective Reduction (OR) as a physical threshold where quantum superposition collapses into definite states, we demonstrate that Penrose's non-computable foundational layer maps directly onto the admissibility domain ($N_1$), rather than emerging from the operational domain ($N_0$) of biological silicio-like structures. Through the theorem of Failure of Local Closure, we argue that the brain's micro-tubular network does not generate consciousness internally, but rather acts as a highly specialized structural antenna tuned to non-derivable conditions of admissibility. Ultimately, this formulation reconciles Gödelian incompleteness in human thought by proving that conscious experience requires an irreducible external structural support ($N_1$) that escapes the operational limits of pure algorithmic computation.

•Jun 18, 2026•0 citations

Decoherence in Quantum Physics

Walter T. Strunz

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2002•13 citations

Decoherence and the Quantum-To-Classical Transition

Maximilian Schlosshauer

The frontiers collection•Jan 1, 2007•1,217 citations
This paper analyzes Roger Penrose’s Orch-OR theory of consciousness through the formal framework of the Theory of Axiomatic Necessity (TNA). By examining Objective Reduction (OR) as a physical threshold where quantum superposition collapses into definite states, we demonstrate that Penrose's non-computable foundational layer maps directly onto the admissibility domain (N1N_1N1​), rather than emerging from the operational domain (N0N_0N0​) of biological silicio-like structures. Through the theorem of Failure of Local Closure, we argue that the brain's micro-tubular network does not generate consciousness internally, but rather acts as a highly specialized structural antenna tuned to non-derivable conditions of admissibility. Ultimately, this formulation reconciles Gödelian incompleteness in human thought by proving that conscious experience requires an irreducible external structural support (N1N_1N1​) that escapes the operational limits of pure algorithmic computation.