Aharonov-Bohm type nonlocality and single particle interference without a loop

We propose a quantitative test of the quantum nonlocality in the electromagnetic interaction that generates the Aharonov-Bohm effect. For this purpose, we derive an interaction Lagrangian based on the action of gauge-invariant quantities only, and compare it with the standard potential-based (nonlocal) Lagrangian. It is shown that the two models provide identical results for any phenomena involving classical equations of motion or topological quantum phases. Interestingly, we find an example violating this equivalence, that is, the interference of single charges coproduced from two independent sources. Whereas a well-defined phase shift of the interference is predicted in the local model, the standard nonlocal Lagrangian does not provide a gauge-invariant phase shift. This implies that an observation of the interference in the proposed setup can rule out the gauge-dependent potential-based model. This result has profound implications as it can settle the issue of dynamical nonlocality in the quantum electromagnetic interaction.We propose a quantitative test of the quantum nonlocality in the electromagnetic interaction that generates the Aharonov-Bohm effect. For this purpose, we derive an interaction Lagrangian based on the action of gauge-invariant quantities only, and compare it with the standard potential-based (nonlocal) Lagrangian. It is shown that the two models provide identical results for any phenomena involving classical equations of motion or topological quantum phases. Interestingly, we find an example violating this equivalence, that is, the interference of single charges coproduced from two independent sources. Whereas a well-defined phase shift of the interference is predicted in the local model, the standard nonlocal Lagrangian does not provide a gauge-invariant phase shift. This implies that an observation of the interference in the proposed setup can rule out the gauge-dependent potential-based model. This result has profound implications as it can settle the issue of dynamical nonlocality in the quantum electromagnetic interaction.

Dec 9, 20150 citations

Proposal for locality test of the Aharonov-Bohm effect via Andreev interferometer without a loop

Kicheon Kang

We propose a quantitative test of the quantum locality in the electromagnetic interaction that generates the Aharonov-Bohm effect. For this purpose, we analyze the Lorentz-covariant field interaction approach based on the local action of gauge-invariant quantities only (“local” theory), and compare it with the standard potential-based (“nonlocal”) theory. Whereas the two approaches yield identical results for topological phase and any phenomenon involving classical equation of motion, an example violating this equivalence is presented; interference of the Andreev reflections from two independent superconducting inputs into a single normal metallic output. A well-defined phase shift of the interference is predicted in the “local” theory. In contrast, the potential-based Lagrangian fails the corresponding prediction. This result is significant as it can settle the issue of quantum locality in the electromagnetic interaction.We propose a quantitative test of the quantum locality in the electromagnetic interaction that generates the Aharonov-Bohm effect. For this purpose, we analyze the Lorentz-covariant field interaction approach based on the local action of gauge-invariant quantities only (“local” theory), and compare it with the standard potential-based (“nonlocal”) theory. Whereas the two approaches yield identical results for topological phase and any phenomenon involving classical equation of motion, an example violating this equivalence is presented; interference of the Andreev reflections from two independent superconducting inputs into a single normal metallic output. A well-defined phase shift of the interference is predicted in the “local” theory. In contrast, the potential-based Lagrangian fails the corresponding prediction. This result is significant as it can settle the issue of quantum locality in the electromagnetic interaction.

arXiv:1512.02765Journal of the Korean Physical SocietyOct 19, 201712 citations

Gauge invariance of the local phase in the Aharonov-Bohm interference: Quantum electrodynamic approach

Kicheon Kang

Abstract In the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, interference fringes are observed for a charged particle in the absence of the local overlap with the external electromagnetic field. This notion of the apparent “nonlocality” of the interaction or the significant role of the potential have recently been challenged and are under debate. The quantum electrodynamic approach provides a microscopic picture of the characteristics of the interaction between a charge and an external field. We explicitly show the gauge invariance of the local phase shift in the magnetic AB effect, which is in contrast to the results obtained using the usual semiclassical vector potential. Our study can resolve the issue of the locality in the magnetic AB effect. However, the problem is not solved in the same way in the electric counterpart wherein virtual scalar photons play an essential role.Abstract In the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, interference fringes are observed for a charged particle in the absence of the local overlap with the external electromagnetic field. This notion of the apparent “nonlocality” of the interaction or the significant role of the potential have recently been challenged and are under debate. The quantum electrodynamic approach provides a microscopic picture of the characteristics of the interaction between a charge and an external field. We explicitly show the gauge invariance of the local phase shift in the magnetic AB effect, which is in contrast to the results obtained using the usual semiclassical vector potential. Our study can resolve the issue of the locality in the magnetic AB effect. However, the problem is not solved in the same way in the electric counterpart wherein virtual scalar photons play an essential role.

arXiv:2206.08620Europhysics Letters (EPL)Nov 1, 20226 citations

Aharonov-Bohm Phase is Locally Generated Like All Other Quantum Phases

Chiara Marletto, Vlatko Vedral

In the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, a superposed charge acquires a detectable phase by enclosing an infinite solenoid, in a region where the solenoid's electric and magnetic fields are zero. Its generation seems therefore explainable only by the local action of gauge-dependent potentials, not of gauge-independent fields. This was recently challenged by Vaidman, who explained the phase by the solenoid's current interacting with the electron's field (at the solenoid). Still, his model has a residual nonlocality: it does not explain how the phase, generated at the solenoid, is detectable on the charge. In this Letter, we solve this nonlocality explicitly by quantizing the field. We show that the AB phase is mediated locally by the entanglement between the charge and the photons, like all electromagnetic phases. We also predict a gauge-invariant value for the phase difference at each point along the charge's path. We propose a realistic experiment to measure this phase difference locally, by partial quantum state tomography on the charge, without closing the interference loop.In the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, a superposed charge acquires a detectable phase by enclosing an infinite solenoid, in a region where the solenoid's electric and magnetic fields are zero. Its generation seems therefore explainable only by the local action of gauge-dependent potentials, not of gauge-independent fields. This was recently challenged by Vaidman, who explained the phase by the solenoid's current interacting with the electron's field (at the solenoid). Still, his model has a residual nonlocality: it does not explain how the phase, generated at the solenoid, is detectable on the charge. In this Letter, we solve this nonlocality explicitly by quantizing the field. We show that the AB phase is mediated locally by the entanglement between the charge and the photons, like all electromagnetic phases. We also predict a gauge-invariant value for the phase difference at each point along the charge's path. We propose a realistic experiment to measure this phase difference locally, by partial quantum state tomography on the charge, without closing the interference loop.

arXiv:1906.03440Physical Review LettersJul 22, 202055 citations

Does the Aharonov-Bohm Effect Imply the Reality of Electromagnetic Potentials?

Shan Gao

The Aharonov--Bohm (AB) phase for a closed interferometric loop is widely regarded as gauge invariant. This conclusion is usually obtained by treating the electromagnetic source as a fixed background that is unaffected by the test charge. We investigate whether this conclusion remains valid when backreaction is included within the standard gauge-fixed formulation of quantum electrodynamics (QED). Our analysis indicates that, when the interfering branches become entangled with distinct electromagnetic field configurations, changes of the gauge-fixing condition can induce a non-vanishing shift of the total phase. This result gives rise to an apparent paradox: the total phase predicted by the QED formalism appears gauge dependent, whereas experiments robustly exhibit a definite interference shift. We examine two possible resolutions of this paradox. The standard approach attributes the observed interference only to a gauge-invariant component of the total phase and treats the remaining gauge-dependent contribution as physically irrelevant. We argue, however, that the QED formalism itself predicts the total phase governing the interference outcome and does not provide a dynamical prescription that extracts a gauge-invariant component while discarding the remaining terms. We then explore an alternative perspective in which the electromagnetic potential $A_\mu$ is regarded as a physical field whose configuration is determined by the Lorenz condition together with appropriate causal and boundary conditions. From this viewpoint, the total phase can be interpreted as a well-defined physical quantity within the QED formalism. We conclude by discussing a possible experimental test based on direct measurements of open-path relative phases, which may help clarify the ontological status of electromagnetic potentials.The Aharonov--Bohm (AB) phase for a closed interferometric loop is widely regarded as gauge invariant. This conclusion is usually obtained by treating the electromagnetic source as a fixed background that is unaffected by the test charge. We investigate whether this conclusion remains valid when backreaction is included within the standard gauge-fixed formulation of quantum electrodynamics (QED). Our analysis indicates that, when the interfering branches become entangled with distinct electromagnetic field configurations, changes of the gauge-fixing condition can induce a non-vanishing shift of the total phase. This result gives rise to an apparent paradox: the total phase predicted by the QED formalism appears gauge dependent, whereas experiments robustly exhibit a definite interference shift. We examine two possible resolutions of this paradox. The standard approach attributes the observed interference only to a gauge-invariant component of the total phase and treats the remaining gauge-dependent contribution as physically irrelevant. We argue, however, that the QED formalism itself predicts the total phase governing the interference outcome and does not provide a dynamical prescription that extracts a gauge-invariant component while discarding the remaining terms. We then explore an alternative perspective in which the electromagnetic potential $A_\mu$ is regarded as a physical field whose configuration is determined by the Lorenz condition together with appropriate causal and boundary conditions. From this viewpoint, the total phase can be interpreted as a well-defined physical quantity within the QED formalism. We conclude by discussing a possible experimental test based on direct measurements of open-path relative phases, which may help clarify the ontological status of electromagnetic potentials.

Aug 6, 20260 citations

Is the Aharonov–Bohm effect local?

Richard Healey

Introduction Aharonov and Bohm (1959) drew attention to the quantum mechanical prediction that an interference pattern due to a beam of charged particles could be produced or altered by the presence of a constant magnetic field in a region from which the particles were excluded. This effect was first experimentally detected by Chambers (1960), and since then has been repeatedly and more convincingly demonstrated in a series of experiments including the elegant experiments of Tonomura et al. (1986). At first sight, the Aharonov-Bohm effect seems to manifest nonlocality. It seems clear that the (electro)magnetic field acts on the particles since it affects the interference pattern they produce; and this must be action at a distance since the particles pass through a region from which that field is absent. Now it is commonly believed that this appearance of nonlocality can be removed by taking it to be the electromagnetic potential A μ rather than the field F μν that acts locally on the particles: indeed, Bohm and Aharonov themselves took the effect to demonstrate the independent reality of the (electro)magnetic potential. But the nonlocality is real, not apparent, and cannot be removed simply by invoking the electromagnetic potential. While there may indeed be more to electromagnetism than can be represented just by the values of F μν at all space-time points, acknowledging this fact still does not permit a completely local account of the Aharonov-Bohm effect.Introduction Aharonov and Bohm (1959) drew attention to the quantum mechanical prediction that an interference pattern due to a beam of charged particles could be produced or altered by the presence of a constant magnetic field in a region from which the particles were excluded. This effect was first experimentally detected by Chambers (1960), and since then has been repeatedly and more convincingly demonstrated in a series of experiments including the elegant experiments of Tonomura et al. (1986). At first sight, the Aharonov-Bohm effect seems to manifest nonlocality. It seems clear that the (electro)magnetic field acts on the particles since it affects the interference pattern they produce; and this must be action at a distance since the particles pass through a region from which that field is absent. Now it is commonly believed that this appearance of nonlocality can be removed by taking it to be the electromagnetic potential A μ rather than the field F μν that acts locally on the particles: indeed, Bohm and Aharonov themselves took the effect to demonstrate the independent reality of the (electro)magnetic potential. But the nonlocality is real, not apparent, and cannot be removed simply by invoking the electromagnetic potential. While there may indeed be more to electromagnetism than can be represented just by the values of F μν at all space-time points, acknowledging this fact still does not permit a completely local account of the Aharonov-Bohm effect.

Cambridge University Press eBooksFeb 18, 19994 citations

A_\mu

is regarded as a physical field whose configuration is determined by the Lorenz condition together with appropriate causal and boundary conditions. From this viewpoint, the total phase can be interpreted as a well-defined physical quantity within the QED formalism. We conclude by discussing a possible experimental test based on direct measurements of open-path relative phases, which may help clarify the ontological status of electromagnetic potentials.