Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM COMPUTATION WITH SMALL SPACE BOUNDS

Abuzer Yakarylmaz

Published Jan 1, 2011• 8 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

QUANTUM COMPUTATION

John P. Preskill

General Relativity and Gravitation•Nov 1, 2005•24 citations

QUANTUM COMPUTATION: AN INTRODUCTION

Adriano Barenco

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Oct 1, 1998•13 citations

OVERVIEW OF QUANTUM COMPUTATION

H.E. Caicedo-Ortiz, Elizabeth Santiago-Cortes

Apple Academic Press eBooks•Oct 22, 2014•1 citation

TRADING CLASSICAL FOR QUANTUM COMPUTATION USING INDIRECTION

Rodney Van Meter

Modular exponentiation is the most expensive portion of Shor’s algorithm. We show that it is possible to reduce the number of quantum modular multiplications necessary by a factor of , at a cost of adding temporary storage space and associated machinery for a table of entries, and performing times as many classical modular multiplications. The storage space may be a quantum-addressable classical memory, or pure quantum memory. With classical computation as much as times as fast as quantum computation, values of from 2 to 30 seem attractive; physically feasible values depend on the implementation of the memory.

International Symposium on Mesoscopic Superconductivity and Spintronics (MS+S)•Aug 1, 2005•0 citations

Classical and Quantum Computation

Daniel Gottesman, Alexei Kitaev, Alexander Khanievich Shen' +1 more

American Mathematical Monthly•Dec 1, 2003•7 citations

QUANTUM COMPUTATION: TOWARDS THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ‘BETWEEN QUANTUM AND CLASSICAL’ COMPUTER

Diederik Aerts, Bart D’Hooghe

Using the ‘between quantum and classical ’ models that have been constructed explicitly within the hidden measurement approach of quantum mechanics we investigate the possibility to construct a ‘between quantum and classical ’ computer. In this view, the pure quantum computer and the classical Turing machine can be seen as two special cases of our general computer. We have shown in earlier research that the intermediate ‘between quantum and classical ’ systems cannot be described within standard quantum theory. We argue that the general categoral approach of state property systems might provide a unified framework for the study of these ‘between quantum and classical’ models, and hence also for the study of classical and quantum computers as special cases. 1

•Jun 1, 2002•1 citation
Modular exponentiation is the most expensive portion of Shor’s algorithm. We show that it is possible to reduce the number of quantum modular multiplications necessary by a factor of , at a cost of adding temporary storage space and associated machinery for a table of entries, and performing times as many classical modular multiplications. The storage space may be a quantum-addressable classical memory, or pure quantum memory. With classical computation as much as times as fast as quantum computation, values of from 2 to 30 seem attractive; physically feasible values depend on the implementation of the memory.
Using the ‘between quantum and classical ’ models that have been constructed explicitly within the hidden measurement approach of quantum mechanics we investigate the possibility to construct a ‘between quantum and classical ’ computer. In this view, the pure quantum computer and the classical Turing machine can be seen as two special cases of our general computer. We have shown in earlier research that the intermediate ‘between quantum and classical ’ systems cannot be described within standard quantum theory. We argue that the general categoral approach of state property systems might provide a unified framework for the study of these ‘between quantum and classical’ models, and hence also for the study of classical and quantum computers as special cases. 1