Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Incompatible Observables and the Measurement of Berry’s Phases

K. Datta

Published Jan 1, 1989• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4613-0787-7_31

Related papers

Berry's phase, density matrices and incompatible observables

K. Datta

Foundations of Physics Letters•Oct 1, 1989•1 citation

Lorentz-group Berry phases in squeezed light

R. Y. Chiao, Paul G. Kwiat, William A. Vareka +1 more

The Berry phases most often observed in experiments are produced by rotations. Berry phases produced by Lorentz transformations are almost as simple mathematically. They have been discussed at length, but there has been no suggestion of observing them in an experiment. Indeed, it has been shown that in one context they can be removed by a canonical transformation; thus they appear to be a property of the mathematical description that could not be observed physically. Here we show that the essential element of these Berry phases could be observed as a change of phase of the electromagnetic field in squeezed states of light or microwaves, as could be produced by degenerate parametric amplifiers. It could be seen as a fringe shift in interference experiments. In this way, a physical effect of the squeezing could be measured without measuring anything like photon statistics or noise.

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America•Jan 1, 1988•1 citation

On simultaneous measurements of incompatible observables

Heinz Dieter Dombrowski

Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis•Jan 1, 1969•1 citation

An Optical Measurement of Berry's Phase

Arthur L. Robinson

Science•Oct 24, 1986•15 citations

Berry Phase in a Nonisolated System

Robert S. Whitney, Yuval Gefen

We investigate the effect of the environment on a Berry phase measurement involving a spin-half. We model the spin + environment using a biased spin-boson Hamiltonian with a time-dependent magnetic field. We find that, contrary to naive expectations, the Berry phase acquired by the spin can be observed, but only on time scales which are neither too short nor very long. However this Berry phase is not the same as for the isolated spin-half. It does not have a simple geometric interpretation in terms of the adiabatic evolution of either bare spin states or the dressed spin resonances. This result is crucial for proposed Berry phase measurements in superconducting nanocircuits.

arXiv:cond-mat/0208141•Physical Review Letters•May 16, 2003•107 citations

On a Weak-Phases Paradox

Tomonori Otsuka

•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations
The Berry phases most often observed in experiments are produced by rotations. Berry phases produced by Lorentz transformations are almost as simple mathematically. They have been discussed at length, but there has been no suggestion of observing them in an experiment. Indeed, it has been shown that in one context they can be removed by a canonical transformation; thus they appear to be a property of the mathematical description that could not be observed physically. Here we show that the essential element of these Berry phases could be observed as a change of phase of the electromagnetic field in squeezed states of light or microwaves, as could be produced by degenerate parametric amplifiers. It could be seen as a fringe shift in interference experiments. In this way, a physical effect of the squeezing could be measured without measuring anything like photon statistics or noise.
We investigate the effect of the environment on a Berry phase measurement involving a spin-half. We model the spin + environment using a biased spin-boson Hamiltonian with a time-dependent magnetic field. We find that, contrary to naive expectations, the Berry phase acquired by the spin can be observed, but only on time scales which are neither too short nor very long. However this Berry phase is not the same as for the isolated spin-half. It does not have a simple geometric interpretation in terms of the adiabatic evolution of either bare spin states or the dressed spin resonances. This result is crucial for proposed Berry phase measurements in superconducting nanocircuits.