Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)

Equivalence between local tracking procedures and monotonic algorithms in quantum control

Gabriel Turinici

Published Oct 4, 2006• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

The computer simulations of quantum control use several approaches including local tracking procedures that prescribe the controlling field through the requirement that a certain functional be decreasing and monotonic algorithms that solve the Euler-Lagrange equations for a predefined cost functional. While different in implementation, recent works [1] hinted that these two classes share some common characteristics. We propose in this contribution a rigorous ground for such conclusions and discuss the precise formulation that allows to construct this equivalence.

DOI
10.1109/cdc.2005.1583490

Related papers

On the relationship between the local tracking procedures and monotonic schemes in quantum optimal control

Julien Salomon, Gabriel Turinici

Numerical simulations of (bilinear) quantum control often rely on either monotonically convergent algorithms or tracking schemes. However, despite their mathematical simplicity, very limited intuitive understanding exists at this time to explain the former type of algorithms. Departing from the usual mathematical formalization, we present in this paper an interpretation of the monotonic algorithms as finite horizon, local in time, tracking schemes. Our purpose is not to present a new class of procedures but rather to introduce the necessary rigorous framework that supports this interpretation. As a by-product we show that at each instant, estimates of the future quality of the current control field are available and used in the optimization. When the target is expressed as reaching a prescribed final state, we also present an intuitive geometrical interpretation as the minimization of the distance between two correlated trajectories: one starting from the given initial state and the other backward in time from the target state. As an illustration, a stochastic monotonic algorithm is introduced. Numerical discretizations of the two procedures are also presented.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Feb 14, 2006•19 citations

Monotonically convergent algorithms for locally constraint quantum controls

Gabriel Turinici

The problem of finding the optimal control in numerical computer simulations of quantum control phenomena is usually addressed through the introduction of monotonically convergent algorithms that are guaranteed to improve the cost functional at each step. A recent extension of these algorithms implements a search for a control with given bounds. Within this context, this paper will present a generalisation of this algorithm to a more general class of local in time constraints. Numerical results that illustrate some of the properties of the algorithms introduced are given. KEY WORDS quantum control, bilinear control, monotonic algorithms, numerical methods, non-linear control 1

•Feb 16, 2005•0 citations

Reference Trajectory Tracking for Locally Designed Coherent Quantum Controls

Mazyar Mirrahimi, Gabriel Turinici, Pierre Rouchon

Local time control methods are used in the simulation of quantum control phenomena because they conveniently ensure an increase of a predefined performance index and also avoid singularities associated with tracking procedures. However, the drawback of the existing implementations is that they only take into account one-photon, direct transitions and may stop at nonoptimal values of the index. We propose in this paper a modification of the currently used algorithms that addresses this issue and explain how the convergence is improved. Furthermore, when iterations are required, we show that this approach can be inserted into a monotonically convergent algorithm.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry A•Feb 26, 2005•60 citations

New formulations of monotonically convergent quantum control algorithms

Yvon Maday, Gabriel Turinici

Most of the numerical simulation in quantum (bilinear) control have used one of the monotonically convergent algorithms of Krotov (introduced by Tannor et al.) or of Zhu and Rabitz. However, until now no explicit relationship has been revealed between the two algorithms in order to understand their common properties. Within this framework, we propose in this paper a unified formulation that comprises both algorithms and that extends to a new class of monotonically convergent algorithms. Numerical results show that the newly derived algorithms behave as well as (and sometimes better than) the well-known algorithms cited above.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Apr 23, 2003•193 citations

A stable toolkit method in quantum control

Mohamed Belhadj, Julien Salomon, Gabriel Turinici

Recently the 'toolkit' discretization introduced to accelerate the numerical resolution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation arising in quantum optimal control problems demonstrated good results on a large range of models. However, when coupling this class of methods with the so-called monotonically convergent algorithms, numerical instabilities affect the convergence of the discretized scheme. We present an adaptation of the 'toolkit' method which preserves the monotonicity of the procedure. The theoretical properties of the new algorithm are illustrated by numerical simulations.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Aug 1, 2008•8 citations

Monotonically convergent optimization in quantum control using Krotov's method

Daniel M. Reich, Mamadou Ndong, Christiane P. Koch

The non-linear optimization method developed by A. Konnov and V. Krotov [Autom. Remote Cont. (Engl. Transl.) 60, 1427 (1999)] has been used previously to extend the capabilities of optimal control theory from the linear to the non-linear Schrödinger equation [S. E. Sklarz and D. J. Tannor, Phys. Rev. A 66, 053619 (2002)]. Here we show that based on the Konnov-Krotov method, monotonically convergent algorithms are obtained for a large class of quantum control problems. It includes, in addition to nonlinear equations of motion, control problems that are characterized by non-unitary time evolution, nonlinear dependencies of the Hamiltonian on the control, time-dependent targets, and optimization functionals that depend to higher than second order on the time-evolving states. We furthermore show that the nonlinear (second order) contribution can be estimated either analytically or numerically, yielding readily applicable optimization algorithms. We demonstrate monotonic convergence for an optimization functional that is an eighth-degree polynomial in the states. For the "standard" quantum control problem of a convex final-time functional, linear equations of motion and linear dependency of the Hamiltonian on the field, the second-order contribution is not required for monotonic convergence but can be used to speed up convergence. We demonstrate this by comparing the performance of first- and second-order algorithms for two examples.

arXiv:1008.5126•The Journal of Chemical Physics•Mar 9, 2012•219 citations
The computer simulations of quantum control use several approaches including local tracking procedures that prescribe the controlling field through the requirement that a certain functional be decreasing and monotonic algorithms that solve the Euler-Lagrange equations for a predefined cost functional. While different in implementation, recent works [1] hinted that these two classes share some common characteristics. We propose in this contribution a rigorous ground for such conclusions and discuss the precise formulation that allows to construct this equivalence.
Numerical simulations of (bilinear) quantum control often rely on either monotonically convergent algorithms or tracking schemes. However, despite their mathematical simplicity, very limited intuitive understanding exists at this time to explain the former type of algorithms. Departing from the usual mathematical formalization, we present in this paper an interpretation of the monotonic algorithms as finite horizon, local in time, tracking schemes. Our purpose is not to present a new class of procedures but rather to introduce the necessary rigorous framework that supports this interpretation. As a by-product we show that at each instant, estimates of the future quality of the current control field are available and used in the optimization. When the target is expressed as reaching a prescribed final state, we also present an intuitive geometrical interpretation as the minimization of the distance between two correlated trajectories: one starting from the given initial state and the other backward in time from the target state. As an illustration, a stochastic monotonic algorithm is introduced. Numerical discretizations of the two procedures are also presented.
The problem of finding the optimal control in numerical computer simulations of quantum control phenomena is usually addressed through the introduction of monotonically convergent algorithms that are guaranteed to improve the cost functional at each step. A recent extension of these algorithms implements a search for a control with given bounds. Within this context, this paper will present a generalisation of this algorithm to a more general class of local in time constraints. Numerical results that illustrate some of the properties of the algorithms introduced are given. KEY WORDS quantum control, bilinear control, monotonic algorithms, numerical methods, non-linear control 1
Local time control methods are used in the simulation of quantum control phenomena because they conveniently ensure an increase of a predefined performance index and also avoid singularities associated with tracking procedures. However, the drawback of the existing implementations is that they only take into account one-photon, direct transitions and may stop at nonoptimal values of the index. We propose in this paper a modification of the currently used algorithms that addresses this issue and explain how the convergence is improved. Furthermore, when iterations are required, we show that this approach can be inserted into a monotonically convergent algorithm.
Most of the numerical simulation in quantum (bilinear) control have used one of the monotonically convergent algorithms of Krotov (introduced by Tannor et al.) or of Zhu and Rabitz. However, until now no explicit relationship has been revealed between the two algorithms in order to understand their common properties. Within this framework, we propose in this paper a unified formulation that comprises both algorithms and that extends to a new class of monotonically convergent algorithms. Numerical results show that the newly derived algorithms behave as well as (and sometimes better than) the well-known algorithms cited above.
Recently the 'toolkit' discretization introduced to accelerate the numerical resolution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation arising in quantum optimal control problems demonstrated good results on a large range of models. However, when coupling this class of methods with the so-called monotonically convergent algorithms, numerical instabilities affect the convergence of the discretized scheme. We present an adaptation of the 'toolkit' method which preserves the monotonicity of the procedure. The theoretical properties of the new algorithm are illustrated by numerical simulations.
The non-linear optimization method developed by A. Konnov and V. Krotov [Autom. Remote Cont. (Engl. Transl.) 60, 1427 (1999)] has been used previously to extend the capabilities of optimal control theory from the linear to the non-linear Schrödinger equation [S. E. Sklarz and D. J. Tannor, Phys. Rev. A 66, 053619 (2002)]. Here we show that based on the Konnov-Krotov method, monotonically convergent algorithms are obtained for a large class of quantum control problems. It includes, in addition to nonlinear equations of motion, control problems that are characterized by non-unitary time evolution, nonlinear dependencies of the Hamiltonian on the control, time-dependent targets, and optimization functionals that depend to higher than second order on the time-evolving states. We furthermore show that the nonlinear (second order) contribution can be estimated either analytically or numerically, yielding readily applicable optimization algorithms. We demonstrate monotonic convergence for an optimization functional that is an eighth-degree polynomial in the states. For the "standard" quantum control problem of a convex final-time functional, linear equations of motion and linear dependency of the Hamiltonian on the field, the second-order contribution is not required for monotonic convergence but can be used to speed up convergence. We demonstrate this by comparing the performance of first- and second-order algorithms for two examples.