Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Adiabatic Quantum Computation

Vicky Choi

Published Jan 1, 2009• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Adiabatic Quantum Computation (AQC) is a quantum model proposed by Farhi, et al., in 2000, and has been proven to be equivalent to conventional quantum computation (quantum gate model). Unlike classical computation or conventional quantum (gate) model in which an algorithm is discrete, an adiabatic quantum algorithm is continuous. In this talk, I will give an introduction of AQC, in particular, on the design and analysis of adiabatic quantum algorithms for the NP-hard maximum independent set problem. I will also discuss the adiabatic quantum architecture design and minor-embedding problems.

Related papers

Alternative adiabatic quantum algorithms with algorithmic applications

Cunningham, Joseph

Adiabatic Quantum Computing (AQC) is a powerful framework for designing quantum algorithms, yet its practical implementation is often hampered by the difficulty of engineering precise, continuous time-dependent Hamiltonians or the substantial computational overhead of time discretisation. This thesis develops alternative adiabatic frameworks based on dissipative and stochastic quantum evolution to circumvent these challenges.The core methodology introduces novel dynamics where discrete quantum operations, such as time-independent Hamiltonian evolution with Poisson-distributed phase randomisation or randomised unitary applications (qubitization), replace continuous evolution. This stochastic approach allows the system’s average behaviour to be rigorously analysed using new, generalised adiabatic theorems, including the development of novel quantitative bounds for unbounded Hamiltonians and specialised dissipative generators.Algorithmically, this work demonstrates that these discrete, stochastic procedures can achieve the optimal asymptotic time complexity of continuous AQC while mitigating discretisation costs. Specifically, adapted-schedule implementations are shown to yield optimal scaling for the Quantum Linear Systems Problem (QLSP), achieving complexity proportional to the condition number $O(\kappa)$, and $O(\sqrt{N/M})$ scaling for unstructured search. By establishing highly efficient, implementable alternatives to continuous AQC, this research offers a significant pathway toward robust and scalable quantum computation. The study also investigates the general family of diagonal Hamiltonians for optimisation problems, revealing that finding the optimal scheduling required for peak performance is, in general, an NP-hard problem.

•Oct 17, 2025•0 citations

Adiabatic Quantum Computing and Global Solution of NP-Hard QUBO Problems: A General Approach

Sanjay Sharma, Ravi Kumar

QUBO problems are NP-hard and have wide applications in optimization, including finance, logistics, machine learning, and combinatorial problems. However, classical algorithms employed for solving them can often get stuck in local minima. This paper presents an Adiabatic Quantum Computing (AQC) approach towards finding an optimal solution for QUBO problems. The QUBO problem has been first encoded into Hamiltonians. The adiabatic theorem has been used to achieve success of an AQC solution with a rate which is found to be dependent on relative gap between the ground state and first exited state of the Hamiltonian.

IEEE International Conference on Interdisciplinary Approaches in Technology and Management for Social Innovation (IATMSI)•Mar 12, 2026•0 citations

Adiabatic Quantum Computing

Sebastian D. Pinski

Adiabatic Quantum Computing (AQC) is a relatively new subject in the world of quantum computing, let alone Physics. Inspiration for this project has come from recent controversy around D-Wave Systems in British Columbia, Canada, who claim to have built a working AQC which is now commercially available and hope to be distributing a 1024 qubit chip by the end of 2008. Their 16 qubit chip was demonstrated online for the Supercomputing 2007 conference within which a few small problems were solved; although the explanations that journalists and critics received were minimal and very little was divulged in the question and answer session. This 'unconvincing' demonstration has caused physicists and computer scientists to hit back at D-Wave. The aim of this project is to give an introduction to the historic advances in classical and quantum computing and to explore the methods of AQC. Through numerical simulations an algorithm for the Max Independent Set problem is empirically obtained.

arXiv:1108.0560•Aug 2, 2011•1 citation

An Alternative Approach to Construct the Initial Hamiltonian of the Adiabatic Quantum Computation

Qian-Heng Duan, Shuo Zhang, Wei Wu +1 more

The adiabatic quantum computation (AQC) has been proven to be equivalent to the standard circuit model. Conventionally, AQC evolves from the initial Hamiltonian which has a uniform equal superposition of the computational basis to the final Hamiltonian whose ground state encodes the solution to a computation problem. We propose an alternative approach to construct the initial Hamiltonian of the AQC which has an unequal superposition of the possible solutions to the problem and show that an educated guess can improve the performance of AQC.

Chinese Physics Letters•Jan 1, 2013•18 citations

Different adiabatic quantum optimization algorithms

Vicky Choi

One of the most important questions in studying quantum computation is: whether a quantum computer can solve NP-complete problems more efficiently than a classical computer? In 2000, Farhi, et al. (Science, 292(5516):472--476, 2001) proposed the adiabatic quantum optimization (AQO), a paradigm that directly attacks NP-hard optimization problems. How powerful is AQO? Early on, van-Dam and Vazirani claimed that AQO failed (i.e. would take exponential time) for a family of 3SAT instances they constructed. More recently, Altshuler, et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 107(28): 12446--12450, 2010) claimed that AQO failed also for random instances of the NP-complete Exact Cover problem. In this paper, we make clear that all these negative results are only for a specific AQO algorithm. We do so by demonstrating different AQO algorithms for the same problem for which their arguments no longer hold. Whether AQO fails or succeeds for solving the NP-complete problems (either the worst case or the average case) requires further investigation. Our AQO algorithms for Exact Cover and 3SAT are based on the polynomial reductions to the NP-complete Maximum-weight Independent Set (MIS) problem.

Quantum Information and Computation•Jul 1, 2011•18 citations

Speed-up of Neuromorphic Adiabatic Quantum Computation by Local Adiabatic Evolution

Mitsunaga Kinjo, Katsuhiko Shimabukuro

Farhi et al. have proposed an adiabatic quantum computation (AQC), which can be applied to NP-problems if one can know an appropriate Hamiltonian for a target problem. We have proposed a neuromorphic adiabatic quantum computation (NAQC) as the AQC with energy dissipation and an efficient method for designing a final Hamiltonian in consideration of the analogy with a neural network. The NAQC can be applied to optimization problems if its cost function can be expressed in a quadratic form. And successful operations have been confirmed by numerical simulations. In addition, local adiabatic evolution for quantum search have proposed by Roland et al. in order to speed-up the calculation time. In this paper, we show preliminary results for NAQC with local adiabatic evolution by numerical simulations.

IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL)•May 1, 2011•1 citation
Adiabatic Quantum Computation (AQC) is a quantum model proposed by Farhi, et al., in 2000, and has been proven to be equivalent to conventional quantum computation (quantum gate model). Unlike classical computation or conventional quantum (gate) model in which an algorithm is discrete, an adiabatic quantum algorithm is continuous. In this talk, I will give an introduction of AQC, in particular, on the design and analysis of adiabatic quantum algorithms for the NP-hard maximum independent set problem. I will also discuss the adiabatic quantum architecture design and minor-embedding problems.
Adiabatic Quantum Computing (AQC) is a powerful framework for designing quantum algorithms, yet its practical implementation is often hampered by the difficulty of engineering precise, continuous time-dependent Hamiltonians or the substantial computational overhead of time discretisation. This thesis develops alternative adiabatic frameworks based on dissipative and stochastic quantum evolution to circumvent these challenges.The core methodology introduces novel dynamics where discrete quantum operations, such as time-independent Hamiltonian evolution with Poisson-distributed phase randomisation or randomised unitary applications (qubitization), replace continuous evolution. This stochastic approach allows the system’s average behaviour to be rigorously analysed using new, generalised adiabatic theorems, including the development of novel quantitative bounds for unbounded Hamiltonians and specialised dissipative generators.Algorithmically, this work demonstrates that these discrete, stochastic procedures can achieve the optimal asymptotic time complexity of continuous AQC while mitigating discretisation costs. Specifically, adapted-schedule implementations are shown to yield optimal scaling for the Quantum Linear Systems Problem (QLSP), achieving complexity proportional to the condition number O(κ)O(\kappa)O(κ), and O(N/M)O(\sqrt{N/M})O(N/M​) scaling for unstructured search. By establishing highly efficient, implementable alternatives to continuous AQC, this research offers a significant pathway toward robust and scalable quantum computation. The study also investigates the general family of diagonal Hamiltonians for optimisation problems, revealing that finding the optimal scheduling required for peak performance is, in general, an NP-hard problem.
QUBO problems are NP-hard and have wide applications in optimization, including finance, logistics, machine learning, and combinatorial problems. However, classical algorithms employed for solving them can often get stuck in local minima. This paper presents an Adiabatic Quantum Computing (AQC) approach towards finding an optimal solution for QUBO problems. The QUBO problem has been first encoded into Hamiltonians. The adiabatic theorem has been used to achieve success of an AQC solution with a rate which is found to be dependent on relative gap between the ground state and first exited state of the Hamiltonian.
Adiabatic Quantum Computing (AQC) is a relatively new subject in the world of quantum computing, let alone Physics. Inspiration for this project has come from recent controversy around D-Wave Systems in British Columbia, Canada, who claim to have built a working AQC which is now commercially available and hope to be distributing a 1024 qubit chip by the end of 2008. Their 16 qubit chip was demonstrated online for the Supercomputing 2007 conference within which a few small problems were solved; although the explanations that journalists and critics received were minimal and very little was divulged in the question and answer session. This 'unconvincing' demonstration has caused physicists and computer scientists to hit back at D-Wave. The aim of this project is to give an introduction to the historic advances in classical and quantum computing and to explore the methods of AQC. Through numerical simulations an algorithm for the Max Independent Set problem is empirically obtained.
The adiabatic quantum computation (AQC) has been proven to be equivalent to the standard circuit model. Conventionally, AQC evolves from the initial Hamiltonian which has a uniform equal superposition of the computational basis to the final Hamiltonian whose ground state encodes the solution to a computation problem. We propose an alternative approach to construct the initial Hamiltonian of the AQC which has an unequal superposition of the possible solutions to the problem and show that an educated guess can improve the performance of AQC.
One of the most important questions in studying quantum computation is: whether a quantum computer can solve NP-complete problems more efficiently than a classical computer? In 2000, Farhi, et al. (Science, 292(5516):472--476, 2001) proposed the adiabatic quantum optimization (AQO), a paradigm that directly attacks NP-hard optimization problems. How powerful is AQO? Early on, van-Dam and Vazirani claimed that AQO failed (i.e. would take exponential time) for a family of 3SAT instances they constructed. More recently, Altshuler, et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 107(28): 12446--12450, 2010) claimed that AQO failed also for random instances of the NP-complete Exact Cover problem. In this paper, we make clear that all these negative results are only for a specific AQO algorithm. We do so by demonstrating different AQO algorithms for the same problem for which their arguments no longer hold. Whether AQO fails or succeeds for solving the NP-complete problems (either the worst case or the average case) requires further investigation. Our AQO algorithms for Exact Cover and 3SAT are based on the polynomial reductions to the NP-complete Maximum-weight Independent Set (MIS) problem.
Farhi et al. have proposed an adiabatic quantum computation (AQC), which can be applied to NP-problems if one can know an appropriate Hamiltonian for a target problem. We have proposed a neuromorphic adiabatic quantum computation (NAQC) as the AQC with energy dissipation and an efficient method for designing a final Hamiltonian in consideration of the analogy with a neural network. The NAQC can be applied to optimization problems if its cost function can be expressed in a quadratic form. And successful operations have been confirmed by numerical simulations. In addition, local adiabatic evolution for quantum search have proposed by Roland et al. in order to speed-up the calculation time. In this paper, we show preliminary results for NAQC with local adiabatic evolution by numerical simulations.