Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Alternative Experimental Protocol for a PBR-Like Theorem

Damien Miller

Published Jan 1, 2012• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

On the Nonreality of the PBR Theorem

Marcoen J. T. F. Cabbolet

arXiv:2211.15469•Foundations of Physics•Jun 1, 2023•5 citations

The PBR theorem: Whose side is it on?

Yemima Ben‐Menahem

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Dec 24, 2016•20 citations

A Discussion on the Validity of the PBR Theorem

İnanç Şahin, Gazi Alumur

Foundations of Physics•Aug 1, 2025•0 citations

Addendum to ‘On the Nonreality of the PBR Theorem’: Disproof by Generic Counterexample

Marcoen J. T. F. Cabbolet

arXiv:2402.15742•Foundations of Physics•Jul 6, 2024•2 citations

Alternative experimental protocol to demonstrate the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph theorem

D. J. Miller

Pusey, Barrett, and Rudolph (PBR) have recently proven an important new theorem in the foundations of quantum mechanics [Pusey et al., Nature Phys. 8, 475 (2012)]. Here we propose alternative experimental protocols which lead to the PBR result for a special case and a weaker PBR-like result generally. Alternative experimental protocols support the assumption of measurement independence required for the PBR theorem.

arXiv:1202.6465•Physical Review A•Jan 16, 2013•13 citations

Three-Spin Systems and the PBR Theorem

Zeynab Faroughi, Ali Ahanj, Samira Nazifkar +1 more

The fundamental nature of quantum wave function has been the subject of many discussions since the beginning of the quantum theory. It either corresponds to an element of reality $(\Psi-ontic)$ or it is a subjective state of knowledge about underlying reality $(\Psi-epistemic)$. Pusey, Barrett, and Rudolph (PBR) showed that epistemic interpretations of the quantum wave function are in contradiction with the predictions of quantum under some assumptions. In this paper, we introduce a laboratory protocol with triple quantum dot as a three-spin interaction system to study the PBR no-go theorem. By this experimental model, we show that the epistemic interpretation of the quantum state is in contradiction with quantum theory, based only on the assumption that measurement settings can be prepared freely and independent of each other.

•Jul 28, 2019•0 citations
The fundamental nature of quantum wave function has been the subject of many discussions since the beginning of the quantum theory. It either corresponds to an element of reality (Ψ−ontic)(\Psi-ontic)(Ψ−ontic) or it is a subjective state of knowledge about underlying reality (Ψ−epistemic)(\Psi-epistemic)(Ψ−epistemic). Pusey, Barrett, and Rudolph (PBR) showed that epistemic interpretations of the quantum wave function are in contradiction with the predictions of quantum under some assumptions. In this paper, we introduce a laboratory protocol with triple quantum dot as a three-spin interaction system to study the PBR no-go theorem. By this experimental model, we show that the epistemic interpretation of the quantum state is in contradiction with quantum theory, based only on the assumption that measurement settings can be prepared freely and independent of each other.