Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics

The Correspondence Principle, Formal Analogy, and Scientific Rationality

Jeongmin Lee

Published Jan 1, 2015• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-18479-1_10

Related papers

Complementarity and Scientific Rationality

Simon Saunders

arXiv:quant-ph/0412195•Foundations of Physics•Mar 1, 2005•19 citations

Methodology: Description, Hermeneutics, and the Analogical Bridge

Manuel Bernardo Muñoz Bastias

This article presents the methodology of a philosophical investigation into the interpretation of Relativity Theory and Quantum Mechanics. Its starting point is a methodological asymmetry: modern theoretical physics has generated a stable scientific core together with persistent and mutually incompatible philosophical interpretations, while the analogical realism of the Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition has remained comparatively absent from that discussion. The method therefore combines two ordered moments. Description reconstructs the scientific theories and philosophical traditions with methodological restraint, distinguishing physical content from later ontological interpretation. Hermeneutical analysis then examines the relations among competing meanings without presupposing the tripartite classification it seeks to test. Causality and the principle of least action function as transversal analytical coordinates across Relativity Theory and Quantum Mechanics, while the uncertainty principle provides an additional coordinate specific to the quantum domain. Fregean sense/reference and the degrees of formal abstraction control transitions among logical, physical, and ontological levels. The Bell-Bohm-Modal-Thomistic (BBMT) model is introduced only as a later bridge to be tested, not as a premise of the descriptive stage. The methodological aim is to determine whether analogical realism can enter the hermeneutic circle of theoretical physics without altering the scientific formalism or collapsing distinct levels of discourse.

•Sep 12, 2026•0 citations

Is Bohr's correspondence principle just Hankel's principle of permanence?

Iulian D. Toader

No, but the paper argues that Bohr understood his correspondence principle, or at least an aspect of that principle expressed by the notion of rational generalization, as grounded in Hankel's principle of permanence, adapted to new historical and theoretical contexts. This is shown to illuminate some otherwise obscure aspects of Bohr's approach to quantum theory, as well as a seemingly strange criticism against this approach, due to Feyerabend and Bohm.

arXiv:2310.10192•Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A•Dec 28, 2023•3 citations

On the Philosophical Significance of the Correspondence Argument

Aage Petersen

Boston studies in the philosophy of science•Jan 1, 1969•0 citations

Formal Verification and Stress-Testing of the Al-Mizan Al-Mutakamil Master Equation for Computational Cosmology and Relational State Dynamics

Davinus Masire Ochanda

Before any foundational physical theory or operator framework can be adopted by the scientific community, it must undergo rigorous validation against established physical and mathematical benchmarks. This paper presents the formal mathematical formulation of the unified Al-Mizan Al-Mutakamil Equation and submits it to six critical scientific stress tests: Dimensional Analysis, Mathematical Consistency, the Correspondence Principle, Falsifiability, Empirical Verification, and Independent Reproducibility. We demonstrate that the framework is strictly non-dimensionalized, globally singularity-free on k \in \mathbb{N}^+, converges to standard unitary quantum dynamics and the Lindblad/FLRW limits as k \to \infty, and makes testable predictions for discrete quantum simulation platforms at a 5\sigma statistical confidence standard.

•Sep 24, 2026•0 citations

I. First Indication of The Generalization of The Correspondence Principle

Niels Bohr•Jan 1, 1976•0 citations
This article presents the methodology of a philosophical investigation into the interpretation of Relativity Theory and Quantum Mechanics. Its starting point is a methodological asymmetry: modern theoretical physics has generated a stable scientific core together with persistent and mutually incompatible philosophical interpretations, while the analogical realism of the Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition has remained comparatively absent from that discussion. The method therefore combines two ordered moments. Description reconstructs the scientific theories and philosophical traditions with methodological restraint, distinguishing physical content from later ontological interpretation. Hermeneutical analysis then examines the relations among competing meanings without presupposing the tripartite classification it seeks to test. Causality and the principle of least action function as transversal analytical coordinates across Relativity Theory and Quantum Mechanics, while the uncertainty principle provides an additional coordinate specific to the quantum domain. Fregean sense/reference and the degrees of formal abstraction control transitions among logical, physical, and ontological levels. The Bell-Bohm-Modal-Thomistic (BBMT) model is introduced only as a later bridge to be tested, not as a premise of the descriptive stage. The methodological aim is to determine whether analogical realism can enter the hermeneutic circle of theoretical physics without altering the scientific formalism or collapsing distinct levels of discourse.
Before any foundational physical theory or operator framework can be adopted by the scientific community, it must undergo rigorous validation against established physical and mathematical benchmarks. This paper presents the formal mathematical formulation of the unified Al-Mizan Al-Mutakamil Equation and submits it to six critical scientific stress tests: Dimensional Analysis, Mathematical Consistency, the Correspondence Principle, Falsifiability, Empirical Verification, and Independent Reproducibility. We demonstrate that the framework is strictly non-dimensionalized, globally singularity-free on k \in \mathbb{N}^+, converges to standard unitary quantum dynamics and the Lindblad/FLRW limits as k \to \infty, and makes testable predictions for discrete quantum simulation platforms at a 5\sigma statistical confidence standard.