Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

identification of their respective contributions

Jean Dalibard, J. Dupont-Roc, Claude N. Cohen-Tannoudji

Published Jan 1, 1982• 2 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

It is generally considered that there exists in quantum radiation theory an indetermination in the separation of the respective effects of vacuum fluctuations and radiation reaction. We show in this paper that such an indetermination can be removed by imposing to the corresponding rates of variation to be Hermitian (this is necessary if we want them to have a physical meaning). Such a procedure is generalized to the case of a small system S interacting with a large reservoir R and allows the separation of two types of physical processes, those where R fluctuates and polarizes S (effects of reservoir fluctuations), those where it is S which polarizes R (effects of self reaction). We apply this procedure to an atomic electron interacting with the radiation field and we then identify the contribution of vacuum fluctuations and self reaction to radiative corrections and spontaneous emis- sion of radiation. The analysis of the results obtained in this way allows us to specify the physical pictures which must be associated with the various radiative processes.

Related papers

Dynamics of a small system coupled to a reservoir : reservoir fluctuations and self-reaction

Jean Dalibard, J. Dupont-Roc, Claude N. Cohen-Tannoudji

The physical processes responsible for the evolution of a small system S weakly coupled to a large reservoir R are analysed through the coupled Heisenberg equations of the problem. The respective contributions of reservoir fluctuations (R fluctuates and polarizes S) and self-reaction (S fluctuates and polarizes R which reacts back on S) are identified with a general method developed in a previous paper dealing with radiative processes (contributions of vacuum fluctuations and radiation reaction). The Hamiltonian and non Hamiltonian parts of the evolution of S are made explicit and related to correlation functions and polarizabilities of S and R. The limit where S is a quasi-classical system is investigated, and the evolution of the energy distribution function of S is shown to be described by a Fokker-Planck equation, the drift and diffusion terms of which are respectively associated with self-reaction and reservoir fluctuations. These results are finally applied to the problem of the spontaneous emission of a large angular momentum (Dicke's model of superradiance).

Journal de physique•Jan 1, 1984•173 citations

Spontaneous emission: vacuum fluctuations or radiation reaction?

Ravinder Rupchand Puri

The role of vacuum fluctuations and radiation reaction in the process of spontaneous emission is examined with particular reference to the Heisenberg picture of quantum electrodynamics. In this picture the radiation reaction is found to be responsible for spontaneous emission if the equations are ordered normally. However, in the case of nonnormally ordered equations there appears to be an explicit contribution to the observable effects from vacuum fluctuations as well. We point out that this contribution from the vacuum field is an artifact of the approximation methods employed for eliminating the free-field variables from the nonnormally ordered equations These approximations are the same as those used in the master-equation approach, in which spontaneous emission appears to be due solely to the vacuum fluctuations. We show that the vacuum field does not contribute explicitly in any ordering if it is eliminated nonperturbatively and the approximation methods are invoked only after its elimination from the equations of motion.

Journal of the Optical Society of America B•Mar 1, 1985•3 citations

Atom-Field Interaction: From Vacuum Fluctuations to Quantum Radiation and Quantum Dissipation or Radiation Reaction

Jen-Tsung Hsiang, B. L. Hu

In this paper, we dwell on three issues: (1) revisit the relation between vacuum fluctuations and radiation reaction in atom-field interactions, an old issue that began in the 1970s and settled in the 1990s with its resolution recorded in monographs; (2) the fluctuation–dissipation relation (FDR) of the system, pointing out the differences between the conventional form in linear response theory (LRT) assuming ultra-weak coupling between the system and the bath, and the FDR in an equilibrated final state, relaxed from the nonequilibrium evolution of an open quantum system; (3) quantum radiation from an atom interacting with a quantum field: We begin with vacuum fluctuations in the field acting on the internal degrees of freedom (idf) of an atom, adding to its dynamics a stochastic component which engenders quantum radiation whose backreaction causes quantum dissipation in the idf of the atom. We show explicitly how different terms representing these processes appear in the equations of motion. Then, using the example of a stationary atom, we show how the absence of radiation in this simple cases is a result of complex cancellations, at a far away observation point, of the interference between emitted radiation from the atom and the local fluctuations in the free field. In so doing we point out in Issue 1 that the entity which enters into the duality relation with vacuum fluctuations is not radiation reaction, which can exist as a classical entity, but quantum dissipation. Finally, regarding issue 2, we point out for systems with many atoms, the co-existence of a set of correlation-propagation relations (CPRs) describing how the correlations between the atoms are related to the propagation of their (retarded non-Markovian) mutual influence manifesting in the quantum field. The CPR is absolutely crucial in keeping the balance of energy flows between the constituents of the system, and between the system and its environment. Without the consideration of this additional relation in tether with the FDR, dynamical self-consistency cannot be sustained. A combination of these two sets of relations forms a generalized matrix FDR relation that captures the physical essence of the interaction between an atom and a quantum field at arbitrary coupling strength.

arXiv:1910.11527•Physics•Dec 17, 2019•18 citations

Radiation reaction and vacuum fluctuations in spontaneous emission

Peter W. Milonni, Wallace Arden Smith

A Heisenberg-picture treatment of spontaneous emission is given, and the origin of radiative line shifts and widths is discussed. It is shown that radiation reaction and vacuum fluctuations provide complementary conceptual bases for the interpretation of these radiative corrections. Alternative approaches are discussed, including the use of a random classical field to simulate the effects of the quantum-electrodynamical radiation field.

Physical Review A•Mar 1, 1975•124 citations

Vacuum fluctuations and radiation reaction in radiative processes of entangled states

Gabriel Menezes, Nami Fux Svaiter

We investigate radiative processes of inertial two-level atoms in an entangled state interacting with a quantum electromagnetic field. Our intention is to clarify and to analyze the contributions of vacuum fluctuations and radiation reaction to the decay rate of the entangled state. The possible relevance of the findings in the present work is discussed.

arXiv:1508.04513•Physical Review A•Dec 28, 2015•38 citations

Fluctuations in Radiative Processes

Claude N. Cohen-Tannoudji

The purpose of these two lectures is to present a brief review of theoretical works done at Ecole Normale Superieure in collaboration with Jean Dalibard, Jacques Dupont-Roc and Claude Fabre. The motivation of these works is to try to understand the dynamics of an atomic system coupled to the radiation field and to get some physical insight in radiative processes in terms of fluctuations of the two interacting systems. By radiative processes, we mean spontaneous emission of radiation by an excited atom and radiative corrections such as the Lamb-shift or g − 2. We will focus here on "spontaneous" effects which are not induced by an incident field, so that the two interacting systems are the atom and the vacuum field.

Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 1986•23 citations
It is generally considered that there exists in quantum radiation theory an indetermination in the separation of the respective effects of vacuum fluctuations and radiation reaction. We show in this paper that such an indetermination can be removed by imposing to the corresponding rates of variation to be Hermitian (this is necessary if we want them to have a physical meaning). Such a procedure is generalized to the case of a small system S interacting with a large reservoir R and allows the separation of two types of physical processes, those where R fluctuates and polarizes S (effects of reservoir fluctuations), those where it is S which polarizes R (effects of self reaction). We apply this procedure to an atomic electron interacting with the radiation field and we then identify the contribution of vacuum fluctuations and self reaction to radiative corrections and spontaneous emis- sion of radiation. The analysis of the results obtained in this way allows us to specify the physical pictures which must be associated with the various radiative processes.
The physical processes responsible for the evolution of a small system S weakly coupled to a large reservoir R are analysed through the coupled Heisenberg equations of the problem. The respective contributions of reservoir fluctuations (R fluctuates and polarizes S) and self-reaction (S fluctuates and polarizes R which reacts back on S) are identified with a general method developed in a previous paper dealing with radiative processes (contributions of vacuum fluctuations and radiation reaction). The Hamiltonian and non Hamiltonian parts of the evolution of S are made explicit and related to correlation functions and polarizabilities of S and R. The limit where S is a quasi-classical system is investigated, and the evolution of the energy distribution function of S is shown to be described by a Fokker-Planck equation, the drift and diffusion terms of which are respectively associated with self-reaction and reservoir fluctuations. These results are finally applied to the problem of the spontaneous emission of a large angular momentum (Dicke's model of superradiance).
The role of vacuum fluctuations and radiation reaction in the process of spontaneous emission is examined with particular reference to the Heisenberg picture of quantum electrodynamics. In this picture the radiation reaction is found to be responsible for spontaneous emission if the equations are ordered normally. However, in the case of nonnormally ordered equations there appears to be an explicit contribution to the observable effects from vacuum fluctuations as well. We point out that this contribution from the vacuum field is an artifact of the approximation methods employed for eliminating the free-field variables from the nonnormally ordered equations These approximations are the same as those used in the master-equation approach, in which spontaneous emission appears to be due solely to the vacuum fluctuations. We show that the vacuum field does not contribute explicitly in any ordering if it is eliminated nonperturbatively and the approximation methods are invoked only after its elimination from the equations of motion.
In this paper, we dwell on three issues: (1) revisit the relation between vacuum fluctuations and radiation reaction in atom-field interactions, an old issue that began in the 1970s and settled in the 1990s with its resolution recorded in monographs; (2) the fluctuation–dissipation relation (FDR) of the system, pointing out the differences between the conventional form in linear response theory (LRT) assuming ultra-weak coupling between the system and the bath, and the FDR in an equilibrated final state, relaxed from the nonequilibrium evolution of an open quantum system; (3) quantum radiation from an atom interacting with a quantum field: We begin with vacuum fluctuations in the field acting on the internal degrees of freedom (idf) of an atom, adding to its dynamics a stochastic component which engenders quantum radiation whose backreaction causes quantum dissipation in the idf of the atom. We show explicitly how different terms representing these processes appear in the equations of motion. Then, using the example of a stationary atom, we show how the absence of radiation in this simple cases is a result of complex cancellations, at a far away observation point, of the interference between emitted radiation from the atom and the local fluctuations in the free field. In so doing we point out in Issue 1 that the entity which enters into the duality relation with vacuum fluctuations is not radiation reaction, which can exist as a classical entity, but quantum dissipation. Finally, regarding issue 2, we point out for systems with many atoms, the co-existence of a set of correlation-propagation relations (CPRs) describing how the correlations between the atoms are related to the propagation of their (retarded non-Markovian) mutual influence manifesting in the quantum field. The CPR is absolutely crucial in keeping the balance of energy flows between the constituents of the system, and between the system and its environment. Without the consideration of this additional relation in tether with the FDR, dynamical self-consistency cannot be sustained. A combination of these two sets of relations forms a generalized matrix FDR relation that captures the physical essence of the interaction between an atom and a quantum field at arbitrary coupling strength.
The purpose of these two lectures is to present a brief review of theoretical works done at Ecole Normale Superieure in collaboration with Jean Dalibard, Jacques Dupont-Roc and Claude Fabre. The motivation of these works is to try to understand the dynamics of an atomic system coupled to the radiation field and to get some physical insight in radiative processes in terms of fluctuations of the two interacting systems. By radiative processes, we mean spontaneous emission of radiation by an excited atom and radiative corrections such as the Lamb-shift or g − 2. We will focus here on "spontaneous" effects which are not induced by an incident field, so that the two interacting systems are the atom and the vacuum field.