Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Active distances for convolutional codes

Stefan Höst, Rolf Johannesson, Kamil Sh. Zigangirov, Victor Zyablov

Published Jan 1, 1996• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Related papers

A lower bound on the distance profile for convolutional codes

Rolf Johannesson, Kamil Sh. Zigangirov

•Jan 1, 1989•0 citations

Decoding Aspects of Product Convolutional Codes and Guaranteeing Product Distance

Stephan Ludwig

•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Distance Bounds for Periodically Time-Varying and Tail-Biting LDPC Convolutional Codes

Dmitri V. Truhachev, Kamil Sh. Zigangirov, Daniel J. Costello

Existence type lower bounds on the free distance of periodically time-varying LDPC convolutional codes and on the minimum distance of tail-biting LDPC convolutional codes are derived. It is demonstrated that the bound on free distance of periodically time-varying LDPC convolutional codes approaches the bound on free distance of general (nonperiodic) time-varying LDPC convolutional codes as the period increases. The proof of the bound is based on lower bounding the minimum distance of corresponding tail-biting LDPC convolutional codes, which is of interest in its own right.

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Aug 19, 2010•26 citations

Asymptotic distance and convergence analysis of braided protograph convolutional codes

Marcos B. S. Tavares, Michael Lentmaier, Gerhard Paul Fettweis +1 more

We analyze a class of LDPC convolutional codes that are constructed from tightly braided convolutional base codes by a lifting procedure. For these braided protograph convolutional codes, we show that the distances grow linearly with the constraint length, and we present lower bounds on their asymptotic segment distance and free distance as well as on the asymptotic minimum distance of their tail-biting versions. With some constraints imposed on the lifting permutations, braided protograph convolutional codes can also be decoded as turbo-like codes by iterative application of the BCJR algorithm. For this case, we derive an explicit upper-bound on the asymptotic decoding error probability as a function of the number of iterations.

Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing•Sep 1, 2008•5 citations

On the Theory of Low-Density Convolutional Codes

Karin Engdahl, Michael Lentmaier, Kamil Sh. Zigangirov

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 1999•35 citations

Soft-Decision Minimum-Distance Decoding

Patrick Guy Farrell

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1978•2 citations
Existence type lower bounds on the free distance of periodically time-varying LDPC convolutional codes and on the minimum distance of tail-biting LDPC convolutional codes are derived. It is demonstrated that the bound on free distance of periodically time-varying LDPC convolutional codes approaches the bound on free distance of general (nonperiodic) time-varying LDPC convolutional codes as the period increases. The proof of the bound is based on lower bounding the minimum distance of corresponding tail-biting LDPC convolutional codes, which is of interest in its own right.
We analyze a class of LDPC convolutional codes that are constructed from tightly braided convolutional base codes by a lifting procedure. For these braided protograph convolutional codes, we show that the distances grow linearly with the constraint length, and we present lower bounds on their asymptotic segment distance and free distance as well as on the asymptotic minimum distance of their tail-biting versions. With some constraints imposed on the lifting permutations, braided protograph convolutional codes can also be decoded as turbo-like codes by iterative application of the BCJR algorithm. For this case, we derive an explicit upper-bound on the asymptotic decoding error probability as a function of the number of iterations.