Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in physics

Quantum Systems with Several Degrees of Freedom

И. Д. Феранчук, A. A. Ivanov, Van-Hoang Le, Alexander P. Ulyanenkov

Published Nov 9, 2014• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-13006-4_5

Related papers

Quantum Mechanics of Systems with a Nonenumerable Number of Degrees of Freedom

S. S. Sannikov-Proskuryakov

Russian Physics Journal•Aug 1, 2001•0 citations

Quantum Computation Based on Photons with Three Degrees of Freedom

Ming-Xing Luo, Hui-Ran Li, Hong Lai +1 more

Quantum systems are important resources for quantum computer. Different from previous encoding forms using quantum systems with one degree of freedom (DoF) or two DoFs, we investigate the possibility of photon systems encoding with three DoFs consisting of the polarization DoF and two spatial DoFs. By exploring the optical circular birefringence induced by an NV center in a diamond embedded in the photonic crystal cavity, we propose several hybrid controlled-NOT (hybrid CNOT) gates operating on the two-photon or one-photon system. These hybrid CNOT gates show that three DoFs may be encoded as independent qubits without auxiliary DoFs. Our result provides a useful way to reduce quantum simulation resources by exploring complex quantum systems for quantum applications requiring large qubit systems.

Scientific Reports•May 13, 2016•12 citations

Entanglement in Structural Degree of Freedom for Classical Discrete Systems

Koretaka Yuge

By extending the concept of entanglement for quantum systems, we here introduce entanglement in structural degree of freedom (SDF) for classical discrete systems through considering extra internal SDF into individual SDF. We provide explicit formulations for systems with two and three degree of freedoms. We demonstrate that entanglement in SDF can be reasonably characterized by employing singular value decomposition (SVD) or canonical polyadic decomposition for deviations in CDOS from ideal harmonic system in terms of SDF. We also employ SVD entropy for scalar quantity to characterize magnitude of entanglement in SDF, whose system size dependence should be carefully examined. We also predict that combination of two SDFs with higher SVD entropy leads to higher uncertainity in structure/potential-energy correspondence in thermodynamically equilibrium state when one of the two SDF is considered as hidden term, indicating that SVD entropy play central role for contribution from SDFs to bijection-breaking in thermodynamic average, as well as contain other significant geometric connections between SDF.

•Nov 22, 2018•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics of Finite Degrees of Freedom

Fabio Benatti

Theoretical and mathematical physics•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Commuting Operators, Quantum Numbers, Symmetry Properties

F. S. Levin

Chapters 5–7 have shown us why and how states play such an essential role in quantum theory. States are distinguished through their labeling, which consists of a set of quantum numbers specific to the state. In general, each degree of freedom gives rise to a quantum number, where, in the present context, the phrase “degrees of freedom” refers to the number of spatial coordinates characterizing a given quantum system. The 1-D systems employed in the two chapters illustrating the postulates were thus single-degree-of-freedom systems: all the eigenstates encountered there were labeled by a single quantum number ( n for bound states and k for continuum states) related to the energy of the system. Having studied systems with a single degree of freedom, it might seem that our next step would be to consider systems with more than one degree of freedom, for example, two 1-D particles or a particle in 3-D subject to a potential, etc. Among the goals of such studies would be the assigning of labels to the eigenstates. If the assignment of quantum numbers were based solely on spatial degrees of freedom, then the preceding endeavor would indeed be a way to proceed with our development of quantum theory. However, spatial degrees of freedom are not the only source of the labels which specify eigenstates. An additional source is the sets of eigenvalues of the operators that commute with Ĥ and with each other. Such operators are the main subject of this chapter.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 3, 2001•0 citations

Systems of coupled quantum and classical degrees of freedom

Gunaretnam Rajagopal

•Aug 1, 1991•0 citations
Quantum systems are important resources for quantum computer. Different from previous encoding forms using quantum systems with one degree of freedom (DoF) or two DoFs, we investigate the possibility of photon systems encoding with three DoFs consisting of the polarization DoF and two spatial DoFs. By exploring the optical circular birefringence induced by an NV center in a diamond embedded in the photonic crystal cavity, we propose several hybrid controlled-NOT (hybrid CNOT) gates operating on the two-photon or one-photon system. These hybrid CNOT gates show that three DoFs may be encoded as independent qubits without auxiliary DoFs. Our result provides a useful way to reduce quantum simulation resources by exploring complex quantum systems for quantum applications requiring large qubit systems.
By extending the concept of entanglement for quantum systems, we here introduce entanglement in structural degree of freedom (SDF) for classical discrete systems through considering extra internal SDF into individual SDF. We provide explicit formulations for systems with two and three degree of freedoms. We demonstrate that entanglement in SDF can be reasonably characterized by employing singular value decomposition (SVD) or canonical polyadic decomposition for deviations in CDOS from ideal harmonic system in terms of SDF. We also employ SVD entropy for scalar quantity to characterize magnitude of entanglement in SDF, whose system size dependence should be carefully examined. We also predict that combination of two SDFs with higher SVD entropy leads to higher uncertainity in structure/potential-energy correspondence in thermodynamically equilibrium state when one of the two SDF is considered as hidden term, indicating that SVD entropy play central role for contribution from SDFs to bijection-breaking in thermodynamic average, as well as contain other significant geometric connections between SDF.
Chapters 5–7 have shown us why and how states play such an essential role in quantum theory. States are distinguished through their labeling, which consists of a set of quantum numbers specific to the state. In general, each degree of freedom gives rise to a quantum number, where, in the present context, the phrase “degrees of freedom” refers to the number of spatial coordinates characterizing a given quantum system. The 1-D systems employed in the two chapters illustrating the postulates were thus single-degree-of-freedom systems: all the eigenstates encountered there were labeled by a single quantum number ( n for bound states and k for continuum states) related to the energy of the system. Having studied systems with a single degree of freedom, it might seem that our next step would be to consider systems with more than one degree of freedom, for example, two 1-D particles or a particle in 3-D subject to a potential, etc. Among the goals of such studies would be the assigning of labels to the eigenstates. If the assignment of quantum numbers were based solely on spatial degrees of freedom, then the preceding endeavor would indeed be a way to proceed with our development of quantum theory. However, spatial degrees of freedom are not the only source of the labels which specify eigenstates. An additional source is the sets of eigenvalues of the operators that commute with Ĥ and with each other. Such operators are the main subject of this chapter.