Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

“Solution” of the EPR Paradox: Negative, or Rather Fuzzy Probabilities?

Jarosław Pykacz

Published Feb 10, 2006• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s10701-005-9025-9

Related papers

Comment on `Is the EPR paradox really a paradox?'

Roland Onmès

European Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 1999•0 citations

The EPR Paradox

The MIT Press eBooks•May 28, 2019•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Its Paradox: A Realistic Solution to Mermin's EPR Apparatus

P. Marmet

Physics Essays•Sep 1, 1993•0 citations

Optimum realization of the EPR paradox in the non-degenerate parametric amplification system

Chao Zhao, TAN WEI-HAN, 上海大学物理系,上海 200444

In this paper, we use the solution of the Fokker-Planck equation for non-degenerate parametric amplification to deduce the condition of demonstration of the EPR paradox. The numerical simulation shows that the optimum realization of EPR paradox can be achieved by adjusting the degree of squeezing, and this is the best condition for demonstrating the EPR paradox for a given finite loss k.

Acta Physica Sinica•Jan 1, 2006•2 citations

The EPR Paradox in the Real World

F. Selleri

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1990•0 citations

A hidden variable solution to the EPR paradox

Jorma Jormakka

The hidden variable solution to the EPR paradox proposes that correlation of measurements of entangled particles is due to variables that get decided when the entangled particles get created. It is shown that the correlation of spin measurements in Bell's form of the EPR paradox can be explained as deriving from spin of the entangled particles in the x-direction. This spin parameter is not hidden as it is included in the standard quantum mechanical formulation.

•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations