Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

Signals faster than light in nonlinear quantum dynamics

Thomas F. Jordan, Zoe‐Elizabeth Sariyanni

Published Dec 1, 1999• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/s0375-9601(99)00595-2

Related papers

Nonlinear quantum dynamics

Salman Habib

arXiv:quant-ph/0505046•Springer eBooks•Jun 25, 2006•2 citations

No-faster-than-light-signaling implies linear evolution. A re-derivation

Angelo Bassi, Kasra Hejazi

Abstract There is a growing interest, both from the theoretical as well as experimental side, to test the validity of the quantum superposition principle, and of theories which explicitly violate it by adding nonlinear terms to the Schrödinger equation. We review the original argument elaborated by Gisin (1989 Helv. Phys. Acta 62 363), which shows that the non-superluminal-signaling condition implies that the dynamics of the density matrix must be linear. This places very strong constraints on the permissible modifications of the Schrödinger equation, since they have to give rise, at the statistical level, to a linear evolution for the density matrix. The derivation is done in a heuristic way here and is appropriate for the students familiar with the textbook quantum mechanics and the language of density matrices.

arXiv:1411.1768•European Journal of Physics•Aug 4, 2015•40 citations

Advances in Quantum Dynamics

Geoffrey L. Price, Baker, B. Mitchell, Palle E. T. Jørgensen +1 more

Contemporary mathematics - American Mathematical Society•Jan 1, 2003•31 citations

Quantum deleting and Signalling

Arun K. Pati, Samuel L. Braunstein

It is known that if we can clone an arbitrary state we can send signal faster than light. Here, we show that deletion of unknown quantum state against a copy can lead to superluminal signalling. But erasure of unknown quantum state does not imply faster than light signalling.

•Jan 1, 2003•23 citations

Nonlinear dynamics from linear quantum evolutions

F.M. Ciaglia, F. Di Cosmo, A. Figueroa +5 more

arXiv:1908.03699•Annals of Physics•Sep 24, 2019•8 citations

Nonlinear Schrödinger equation and two-level atoms

Marek Czachor

Starting with the same form of atomic nonlinearity, Weinberg [Ann. Phys. (NY) 194, 336 (1989)] and W\'odkiewicz and Scully [Phys. Rev. A 42, 5111 (1990)] obtained contradictory results concerning an evolution of the atomic inversion w in a two-level atom in Weinberg's nonlinear quantum mechanics: If the atom is initially in a ground state then either the evolution of w (1) can be linear if one uses a nonlinear generalization of the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian, or (2) is always nonlinear if one uses the nonlinear Bloch equations derived from the nonlinear atomic Hamiltonian function. It is shown that the difference is rooted in inequivalent descriptions of the composite ``atom-plus-field'' system. The linear evolution of w results from a ``faster-than-light communication'' between the atom and the field. If one applies a description without the ``faster-than-light telegraph'' then the calculations based on a suitably modified Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian lead to the same dynamics of w as is found in semiclassical calculations based on Bloch equations. It is shown also that a nonlinear quantum mechanics based on a nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation does not possess a natural probability interpretation.

arXiv:quant-ph/9501007•Physical Review A•Mar 1, 1996•28 citations
Abstract There is a growing interest, both from the theoretical as well as experimental side, to test the validity of the quantum superposition principle, and of theories which explicitly violate it by adding nonlinear terms to the Schrödinger equation. We review the original argument elaborated by Gisin (1989 Helv. Phys. Acta 62 363), which shows that the non-superluminal-signaling condition implies that the dynamics of the density matrix must be linear. This places very strong constraints on the permissible modifications of the Schrödinger equation, since they have to give rise, at the statistical level, to a linear evolution for the density matrix. The derivation is done in a heuristic way here and is appropriate for the students familiar with the textbook quantum mechanics and the language of density matrices.
Starting with the same form of atomic nonlinearity, Weinberg [Ann. Phys. (NY) 194, 336 (1989)] and W\'odkiewicz and Scully [Phys. Rev. A 42, 5111 (1990)] obtained contradictory results concerning an evolution of the atomic inversion w in a two-level atom in Weinberg's nonlinear quantum mechanics: If the atom is initially in a ground state then either the evolution of w (1) can be linear if one uses a nonlinear generalization of the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian, or (2) is always nonlinear if one uses the nonlinear Bloch equations derived from the nonlinear atomic Hamiltonian function. It is shown that the difference is rooted in inequivalent descriptions of the composite ``atom-plus-field'' system. The linear evolution of w results from a ``faster-than-light communication'' between the atom and the field. If one applies a description without the ``faster-than-light telegraph'' then the calculations based on a suitably modified Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian lead to the same dynamics of w as is found in semiclassical calculations based on Bloch equations. It is shown also that a nonlinear quantum mechanics based on a nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation does not possess a natural probability interpretation.