Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Atlantis studies in mathematical physics

Lecture 15: Semiclassical Limit; Coherent States; Metaplectic Group

Gianfausto Dell’Antonio

Published Jan 1, 2015• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

According to Bohr’s correspondence principle when the energy levels are very closely spaced the description of the emission and absorption processes in Quantum Mechanics should approach the one given in Classical Mechanics.
DOI
10.2991/978-94-6239-118-5_15

Related papers

A note on semiclassical bound states and correspondence principles

Francis J. McLafferty, Thomas F. George

Semiclassical bound state theory is considered from the viewpoint of the phase space representations of quantum mechanics. In the small h/ limit, within a representation defined by the ordering chosen for the noncommuting position and momentum operators, we obtain: (1) equations of motion, which need not be classical and (2) correspondence principles in action-angle variables, regarded as those initial conditions on the equations of motion which dominate in the small h/ limit. The Weyl ordering is seen to generate the classical equations of motion and the normal correspondence result. Possible evaluation of semiclassical bound state energies is discussed by means of the eigenvalue approach to classical mechanics used by Prigogine and co-workers.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Apr 1, 1976•0 citations

Semiclassical quantum mechanics

H.‐J. Stöckmann

In the preceding chapters we have learnt that random matrix theory is perfectly able to explain the universal properties of the spectra of chaotic systems, and this in spite of the oversimplifying assumptions applied. On the one hand it is very satisfactory that one single theory can cope with such a variety of systems as nuclei, mesoscopic structures, or microwave billiards, on the other hand this is a bit disappointing. If there is no possibility of discriminating between the spectra of a nucleus and a quantum dot, then there is little hope of learning anything of relevance about it. Fortunately, random matrix theory is only one side of the coin. We have already come across some examples demonstrating its limits of validity. Remember the spectral level dynamics where bouncing balls disturbed the otherwise universal Gaussian velocity distribution (see Section 5.2.2). Another example is the scarring phenomenon observed in many wave functions. Here obviously closed classical orbits have left their fingerprints in the amplitude patterns. We cannot expect that the universal random matrix theory can correctly account for individual features such as periodic orbits. We now come to an alternative approach to analysing the spectra. As we know from the correspondence principle, in the semiclassical limit quantum mechanics eventually turns into classical mechanics. That is why classical dynamics must be hidden somewhere in the spectra, at least in the limit of high quantum numbers. In the introduction we have already discussed this connection for a particle in a one-dimensional box.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Oct 13, 1999•1 citation

Spontaneous emission

P. van der Straten, Harold J. Metcalf

Introduction The preceding chapters have focused on atomic transitions induced by applied radiation. That is, there is an optical field illuminating the atoms, and their response is calculated. It is implicitly assumed that an excited atom left alone will spontaneously return to the ground state, and conserve energy by emitting light that satisfies E 2 − E 1 = ħ ω 21 in accordance with the Planck and Bohr pictures. But this spontaneous emission process is not addressed quantitatively in these earlier chapters. Spontaneous emission is one of the most pervasive phenomena of atomic physics, and yet its origins remain among the least well-understood. The number of misconceptions is enormous, and they are to be found in textbooks, journal articles, and lecture notes. Because the natural decay of an excited atom adds energy to what is usually an empty mode of the electromagnetic field, the process is fundamentally quantum mechanical. Classical or even semi-classical descriptions cannot be assured to give correct answers. This is not to say that such discussion is to be avoided, but only that caution is needed in interpreting the results. Toward the end of the nineteenth century, many experimental results made it clear that classical mechanics needed to be supplemented by new theories. The first venture into the new physics was Planck's hypothesis that the energy of classical radiating oscillators like those discussed in Chap. 1 would have to be quantized into integer multiples of ħ ω. This notion led to his famous formula for the spectrum of thermal radiation from a non-reflective object (black body), and this formula describes a radiation field in thermodynamic equilibrium with its environment. The result of Planck's hypothesis in the context of thermal equilibrium plays a vital role in the discussion of spontaneous emission. Einstein A - and B -coefficients Soon after Bohr proposed a model of atomic structure consisting of discrete energy levels, connected by radiation whose energy satisfied Δ E = ħω when atoms made transition between them, Einstein published the first serious attempt to connect the absorption and emission processes. Absorption, he reasoned, could occur only in the presence of applied radiation, whereas spontaneous decay occurred without the application of any field.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 31, 2015•0 citations

PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELD THEORY SEMICLASSICAL, TRAJECTORY-COHERENT, QUASI-ENERGY STATES FOR THE ONE-DIMENSIONAL SCHRODINGER EQUATION

V. D. Baranov

•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations

Description of n -level systems in cooperative behavior. II. Energy states, coherent states, and classical limit theories

I. R. Senitzky

This paper discusses the suitability of a boson-second-quantization (BSQ) formalism for the description of cooperative atomic behavior---such as that encountered in quantum optics or laser-type phenomena. The physical significance of BSQ energy states and atomic coherent states, as well as the corresponding first quantization descriptions, are discussed. Specialization to the case in which the individual atomic systems are characterized by two levels allows comparison of the BSQ theory with other theories of cooperative behavior, not all of which can be generalized to the case of more than two levels. Passage to the classical limit, an analytical process that must be possible for macroscopic phenomena, is shown to be accomplished very simply in the BSQ formalism by conversion of the small number of collective (quantum mechanical) variables to classical random variables which are prescribed according to the quantum state of the total system. It is found that conventional semiclassical theory is a special case of the fully classical limit of the BSQ formalism, the specialization being the requirement that the system be in an atomic coherent state. The justification for the identification of coherent states with a classical description and energy states with a quantum-mechanical description, found in some of the literature on two-level systems, is questioned.

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1977•10 citations

THE PHASE-SPACE REPRESENTATION OF QUANTUM MECHANICS AND THE BOHR-HEISENBERG CORRESPONDENCE PRINCIPLE

Jens Peder Dahl

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1985•4 citations
Semiclassical bound state theory is considered from the viewpoint of the phase space representations of quantum mechanics. In the small h/ limit, within a representation defined by the ordering chosen for the noncommuting position and momentum operators, we obtain: (1) equations of motion, which need not be classical and (2) correspondence principles in action-angle variables, regarded as those initial conditions on the equations of motion which dominate in the small h/ limit. The Weyl ordering is seen to generate the classical equations of motion and the normal correspondence result. Possible evaluation of semiclassical bound state energies is discussed by means of the eigenvalue approach to classical mechanics used by Prigogine and co-workers.
In the preceding chapters we have learnt that random matrix theory is perfectly able to explain the universal properties of the spectra of chaotic systems, and this in spite of the oversimplifying assumptions applied. On the one hand it is very satisfactory that one single theory can cope with such a variety of systems as nuclei, mesoscopic structures, or microwave billiards, on the other hand this is a bit disappointing. If there is no possibility of discriminating between the spectra of a nucleus and a quantum dot, then there is little hope of learning anything of relevance about it. Fortunately, random matrix theory is only one side of the coin. We have already come across some examples demonstrating its limits of validity. Remember the spectral level dynamics where bouncing balls disturbed the otherwise universal Gaussian velocity distribution (see Section 5.2.2). Another example is the scarring phenomenon observed in many wave functions. Here obviously closed classical orbits have left their fingerprints in the amplitude patterns. We cannot expect that the universal random matrix theory can correctly account for individual features such as periodic orbits. We now come to an alternative approach to analysing the spectra. As we know from the correspondence principle, in the semiclassical limit quantum mechanics eventually turns into classical mechanics. That is why classical dynamics must be hidden somewhere in the spectra, at least in the limit of high quantum numbers. In the introduction we have already discussed this connection for a particle in a one-dimensional box.
Introduction The preceding chapters have focused on atomic transitions induced by applied radiation. That is, there is an optical field illuminating the atoms, and their response is calculated. It is implicitly assumed that an excited atom left alone will spontaneously return to the ground state, and conserve energy by emitting light that satisfies E 2 − E 1 = ħ ω 21 in accordance with the Planck and Bohr pictures. But this spontaneous emission process is not addressed quantitatively in these earlier chapters. Spontaneous emission is one of the most pervasive phenomena of atomic physics, and yet its origins remain among the least well-understood. The number of misconceptions is enormous, and they are to be found in textbooks, journal articles, and lecture notes. Because the natural decay of an excited atom adds energy to what is usually an empty mode of the electromagnetic field, the process is fundamentally quantum mechanical. Classical or even semi-classical descriptions cannot be assured to give correct answers. This is not to say that such discussion is to be avoided, but only that caution is needed in interpreting the results. Toward the end of the nineteenth century, many experimental results made it clear that classical mechanics needed to be supplemented by new theories. The first venture into the new physics was Planck's hypothesis that the energy of classical radiating oscillators like those discussed in Chap. 1 would have to be quantized into integer multiples of ħ ω. This notion led to his famous formula for the spectrum of thermal radiation from a non-reflective object (black body), and this formula describes a radiation field in thermodynamic equilibrium with its environment. The result of Planck's hypothesis in the context of thermal equilibrium plays a vital role in the discussion of spontaneous emission. Einstein A - and B -coefficients Soon after Bohr proposed a model of atomic structure consisting of discrete energy levels, connected by radiation whose energy satisfied Δ E = ħω when atoms made transition between them, Einstein published the first serious attempt to connect the absorption and emission processes. Absorption, he reasoned, could occur only in the presence of applied radiation, whereas spontaneous decay occurred without the application of any field.
This paper discusses the suitability of a boson-second-quantization (BSQ) formalism for the description of cooperative atomic behavior---such as that encountered in quantum optics or laser-type phenomena. The physical significance of BSQ energy states and atomic coherent states, as well as the corresponding first quantization descriptions, are discussed. Specialization to the case in which the individual atomic systems are characterized by two levels allows comparison of the BSQ theory with other theories of cooperative behavior, not all of which can be generalized to the case of more than two levels. Passage to the classical limit, an analytical process that must be possible for macroscopic phenomena, is shown to be accomplished very simply in the BSQ formalism by conversion of the small number of collective (quantum mechanical) variables to classical random variables which are prescribed according to the quantum state of the total system. It is found that conventional semiclassical theory is a special case of the fully classical limit of the BSQ formalism, the specialization being the requirement that the system be in an atomic coherent state. The justification for the identification of coherent states with a classical description and energy states with a quantum-mechanical description, found in some of the literature on two-level systems, is questioned.