Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Local and non-local vertex corrections in GW for extended and localized systems

Martin Stankovski, Andrew J. Morris, Benjamin Robinson, Rex W. Godby, Kris T. Delaney, Patrick Rinke, Ulf von Barth, Carl-Olof Almbladh, Pablo Garc 'Ia-Gonz 'alez

Published Mar 8, 2007• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

The GW Approximation and Vertex Corrections F erdi Aryasetiawan 1 Introduction

Vladimir I. Anisimov

•May 30, 2000•0 citations

Local vertex corrections from exchange-correlation kernels with a discontinuity

Maria Hellgren

arXiv:1805.06802•The European Physical Journal B•Jul 1, 2018•5 citations

Systematic Vertex Corrections to Many-body Theory through Continued Iterative Solution of Hedin's Equations beyond the GW Approximation

Arno Schindlmayr, Rex W. Godby

APS•Mar 1, 1997•0 citations

Ab initio calculations with the dynamical vertex approximation

A. Toschi, G. Rohringer, A. A. Katanin +1 more

Abstract We propose an approach for the ab initio calculation of materials with strong electronic correlations which is based on all local (fully irreducible) vertex corrections beyond the bare Coulomb interaction. It includes the so‐called GW and dynamical mean field theory and important non‐local correlations beyond, with a computational effort estimated to be still manageable.

arXiv:1104.2188•Annalen der Physik•Aug 26, 2011•37 citations

Spatial non-locality of electronic correlations beyond GW approximation

Andrey L. Kutepov

Abstract The question of spatial locality of electronic correlations beyond GW approximation is one of the central issues of the famous combination of GW and dynamical mean field theory, GW + DMFT. In this work, the above question is addressed directly (for the first time) by performing calculations with and without assumption of locality of the corresponding diagrams. For this purpose we use sc(GW + G3W2) approach where the higher order part (G3W2) is evaluated with fully momentum dependent Green’s function G and screened interaction W and with ‘local’ variant, where the single site approximation is assumed for both G and W. For all three materials studied in this work (NiO, α -Ce, LiFeAs), we have found the spatial non-locality effects to be strong. For NiO and LiFeAs they, in fact, are decisive for the proper evaluation of vertex corrections. The results of this study have direct impact on our understanding of approximations made in practical implementations of GW + DMFT method, where all diagrams beyond GW (DMFT part) are assumed to be local. Taking into account the fact that the first diagrams beyond GW represent the most important contribution also in GW + DMFT calculations, we conclude that the basic assumption of GW + DMFT, namely the locality of diagrams evaluated in the DMFT part, is not as good as it is believed to be.

arXiv:2106.03800•Journal of Physics Condensed Matter•Sep 6, 2021•6 citations

The self-energy beyond GW: Local and nonlocal vertex corrections

Pina Romaniello, Steve Guyot, Lucia Reining

It is commonly accepted that the GW approximation for the electron self-energy is successful for the description of the band structure of weakly to moderately correlated systems, whereas it will fail for strongly correlated materials. In the present work, we discuss two important aspects of this approximation: first, the "self-screening error," which is due to an incorrect treatment of induced exchange, and second, the atomic limit, in which, instead, correlation is directly responsible for the observed problem. Using the example of the removal of a particle from a box, we show that the self-screening error stems from the use of test charge-test charge screening and that it can be corrected by a two-point vertex contribution to the self-energy derived from time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT). We explain why the addition of a particle, instead, requires the use of a different approximate vertex. This illustrates why the general vertex function, valid both for valence and conduction states, must be a three-point function. Moreover, we show that also the bad performance of GW in the atomic limit is due to the neglect of the vertex in the self-energy; in that case, the TDDFT-derived vertex correction is not sufficient in order to remove the error even qualitatively. We discuss the effects of the self-screening error as well as the atomic limit using GW for the exactly solvable two-site Hubbard model.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Oct 20, 2009•131 citations
Abstract The question of spatial locality of electronic correlations beyond GW approximation is one of the central issues of the famous combination of GW and dynamical mean field theory, GW + DMFT. In this work, the above question is addressed directly (for the first time) by performing calculations with and without assumption of locality of the corresponding diagrams. For this purpose we use sc(GW + G3W2) approach where the higher order part (G3W2) is evaluated with fully momentum dependent Green’s function G and screened interaction W and with ‘local’ variant, where the single site approximation is assumed for both G and W. For all three materials studied in this work (NiO, α -Ce, LiFeAs), we have found the spatial non-locality effects to be strong. For NiO and LiFeAs they, in fact, are decisive for the proper evaluation of vertex corrections. The results of this study have direct impact on our understanding of approximations made in practical implementations of GW + DMFT method, where all diagrams beyond GW (DMFT part) are assumed to be local. Taking into account the fact that the first diagrams beyond GW represent the most important contribution also in GW + DMFT calculations, we conclude that the basic assumption of GW + DMFT, namely the locality of diagrams evaluated in the DMFT part, is not as good as it is believed to be.
It is commonly accepted that the GW approximation for the electron self-energy is successful for the description of the band structure of weakly to moderately correlated systems, whereas it will fail for strongly correlated materials. In the present work, we discuss two important aspects of this approximation: first, the "self-screening error," which is due to an incorrect treatment of induced exchange, and second, the atomic limit, in which, instead, correlation is directly responsible for the observed problem. Using the example of the removal of a particle from a box, we show that the self-screening error stems from the use of test charge-test charge screening and that it can be corrected by a two-point vertex contribution to the self-energy derived from time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT). We explain why the addition of a particle, instead, requires the use of a different approximate vertex. This illustrates why the general vertex function, valid both for valence and conduction states, must be a three-point function. Moreover, we show that also the bad performance of GW in the atomic limit is due to the neglect of the vertex in the self-energy; in that case, the TDDFT-derived vertex correction is not sufficient in order to remove the error even qualitatively. We discuss the effects of the self-screening error as well as the atomic limit using GW for the exactly solvable two-site Hubbard model.