Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

Total Current Operator and its Classical Correspondence for Particles Bounded in Central Force Fields

Quanhui Liu, X. Wang, Yabin Yu

Published Feb 21, 2007• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s10773-005-9006-y

Related papers

Doebner-Goldin Equation for Electrodynamic Particle. The Implied Applications

J. X. Zheng-Johansson

We set up the Maxwell's equations and the corresponding classical wave equations for the electromagnetic waves which together with the generating source, a traveling oscillatory charge of zero rest mass, comprise a particle traveling in the force field of an usual conservative potential and an additional frictional force $f$. At the de Broglie wavelength scale and in the classic-velocity limit, the total wave equation decomposes into a component equation describing the particle kinetic motion, which for $f=0$ identifies with the usual linear Schrödinger equation as previously. The $f$-dependent probability density presents generally an observable diffusion current of a real diffusion constant; this and the particle's usual quantum diffusion current as a whole are under adiabatic condition conserved and obey the Fokker-Planck equation. The corresponding extra, $f$-dependent term in the Hamiltonian operator identifies with that obtained by H.-D. Doebner and G.A. Goldin. The friction produces to the particle's wave amplitude a damping that can describe well the effect due to a radiation (de)polarization field, which is always by-produced by the particle's oscillatory charge in a (nonpolar) dielectric medium. The radiation depolarization field in a dielectric vacuum has two separate significances: it participates to exert on another particle an attractive, depolarization radiation force which resembles in overall respects Newton's universal gravity as we showed earlier, and it exerts on the particle itself an attractive, self depolarization radiation force whose time rate gives directly the frictional force $f$.

arXiv:0801.4279•Jan 28, 2008•3 citations

Central field wave functions and angular momentum operators

Norman Henry March

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1975•0 citations

The Inverse-Cube Central Force Field in Quantum Mechanics

George H. Shortley

The problem of the motion of a particle in an inverse-cube central force field is fully treated by quantum mechanics and the results compared with the classical theory. Taking the effective radial potential energy as $\frac{S}{{r}^{2}}$, although the solutions for negative energy for $0\ensuremath{\geqq}S\ensuremath{\geqq}\frac{\ensuremath{-}{h}^{2}}{32{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{2}\ensuremath{\mu}}$ satisfy the usual boundary conditions, they can not be admitted because the Hamiltonian is not Hermitian in these solutions. This corresponds to taking ${(l+\frac{1}{2})}^{2}$ in place of $l(l+1)$ as the analogue of the square of the classical angular momentum. If we do this, we get a complete analogy between the classical and quantum mechanically allowed solutions, with no quantization. The solutions involve Bessel functions of both real and imaginary orders with both real and imaginary arguments.

Physical Review•Jul 1, 1931•53 citations

Central Forces in Quantum Mechanics

Rainer Dick

Graduate texts in physics•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

Central Forces in Quantum Mechanics

Rainer Dick

Graduate texts in physics•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

A relationship about the stationary bound state of centrally symmetric potential

Gao Ze-yang

For a microscopic particle in a centrally symmetric potential and in its stationary bound state,there is a relationship about the expectation value of the force to the particle.In this paper,several different proofs to this relationship are presented with a discussion to its physics connotation.In addition,the conditions necessary for the relationship to hold is discussed,hence the related misunderstanding or inaccuracy currently in literature is clarified.

College Physics•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations
We set up the Maxwell's equations and the corresponding classical wave equations for the electromagnetic waves which together with the generating source, a traveling oscillatory charge of zero rest mass, comprise a particle traveling in the force field of an usual conservative potential and an additional frictional force fff. At the de Broglie wavelength scale and in the classic-velocity limit, the total wave equation decomposes into a component equation describing the particle kinetic motion, which for f=0f=0f=0 identifies with the usual linear Schrödinger equation as previously. The fff-dependent probability density presents generally an observable diffusion current of a real diffusion constant; this and the particle's usual quantum diffusion current as a whole are under adiabatic condition conserved and obey the Fokker-Planck equation. The corresponding extra, fff-dependent term in the Hamiltonian operator identifies with that obtained by H.-D. Doebner and G.A. Goldin. The friction produces to the particle's wave amplitude a damping that can describe well the effect due to a radiation (de)polarization field, which is always by-produced by the particle's oscillatory charge in a (nonpolar) dielectric medium. The radiation depolarization field in a dielectric vacuum has two separate significances: it participates to exert on another particle an attractive, depolarization radiation force which resembles in overall respects Newton's universal gravity as we showed earlier, and it exerts on the particle itself an attractive, self depolarization radiation force whose time rate gives directly the frictional force fff.
The problem of the motion of a particle in an inverse-cube central force field is fully treated by quantum mechanics and the results compared with the classical theory. Taking the effective radial potential energy as Sr2\frac{S}{{r}^{2}}r2S​, although the solutions for negative energy for $0\ensuremath{\geqq}S\ensuremath{\geqq}\frac{\ensuremath{-}{h}^{2}}{32{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{2}\ensuremath{\mu}}$ satisfy the usual boundary conditions, they can not be admitted because the Hamiltonian is not Hermitian in these solutions. This corresponds to taking (l+12)2{(l+\frac{1}{2})}^{2}(l+21​)2 in place of l(l+1)l(l+1)l(l+1) as the analogue of the square of the classical angular momentum. If we do this, we get a complete analogy between the classical and quantum mechanically allowed solutions, with no quantization. The solutions involve Bessel functions of both real and imaginary orders with both real and imaginary arguments.