Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer proceedings in physics

Event-by-event Simulation of EPR-Bohm Experiments

Koen De Raedt, Koenraad Keimpema, Hans A. De Raedt, Kristel F. L. Michielsen, Seiji Miyashita

Published Nov 27, 2008• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-540-85625-2_10

Related papers

On the Computer Simulation of the EPR—Bohm Experiment

David O. McGoveran, H. Pierre Noyes, Michael J. Manthey

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1989•3 citations

EPR-Bohm Experiment and Interference of Probabilities

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Foundations of Physics Letters•Dec 1, 2004•7 citations

Parameter dependence in the EPR-Bohm type experiment

Dipankar Home, M. A. B. Whitaker

Physics Letters A•Apr 1, 1994•2 citations

Non-locality II: Dynamical models of the EPR–Bohm experiment

W. Michael Dickson

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 2, 1998•0 citations

Hidden‐Variables Model and Nonlocality in the Bohm/EPR Experiment

KENNETH H. SCHATIEN

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences•Apr 1, 1995•0 citations

Event Independence, Collective Independence, EPR‐Bohm Experiment, and Incompleteness of Quantum Mechanics

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

We analyse notion of independence in the EPR-Bohm framework by using comparative analysis of independence in conventional and frequency probability theories. Such an analysis is important to demonstrate that Bell's inequality was obtained by using totally unjustified assumptions (e.g. the Bell-Clauser-Horne factorability condition). Our frequency analysis also demonstrated that Gill-Weihs-Zeilinger-Zukowski's arguments based on "the experimenter's freedom to choose settings" to support the standard Bell approach are neither justified by the structure of the EPR-Bohm experiment. Finally, our analysis supports the original Einstein's viewpoint that quantum mechanics is simply not complete.

arXiv:quant-ph/0205081•Physics Essays•Jun 1, 2003•2 citations
We analyse notion of independence in the EPR-Bohm framework by using comparative analysis of independence in conventional and frequency probability theories. Such an analysis is important to demonstrate that Bell's inequality was obtained by using totally unjustified assumptions (e.g. the Bell-Clauser-Horne factorability condition). Our frequency analysis also demonstrated that Gill-Weihs-Zeilinger-Zukowski's arguments based on "the experimenter's freedom to choose settings" to support the standard Bell approach are neither justified by the structure of the EPR-Bohm experiment. Finally, our analysis supports the original Einstein's viewpoint that quantum mechanics is simply not complete.