Measurement of the information velocity in fast- and slow-light optical pulse propagation

It is widely believed that the velocity of information ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{i}$ encoded on an optical pulse is equal to the group velocity ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{g}$, at least when ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{g}$ is less than the speed of light in vacuum $c$ . On the other hand, several authors suggest that ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{i}=c$, although the size of the signal traveling at this velocity may be small, thereby making it difficult to measure. Here, we measure ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{i}$ for pulses propagating through a resonant ``slow-light'' medium where ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{g}\ensuremath{\approx}0.006c$. We find ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{i}=1.03{c}_{\ensuremath{-}0.25c}^{+0.49c}$, or that ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{i}\ensuremath{\approx}168{\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{g}$, clearly demonstrating that the speed of information cannot be generally described by ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{g}$, but is characterized by its own velocity.It is widely believed that the velocity of information ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{i}$ encoded on an optical pulse is equal to the group velocity ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{g}$, at least when ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{g}$ is less than the speed of light in vacuum $c$. On the other hand, several authors suggest that ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{i}=c$, although the size of the signal traveling at this velocity may be small, thereby making it difficult to measure. Here, we measure ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{i}$ for pulses propagating through a resonant ``slow-light'' medium where ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{g}\ensuremath{\approx}0.006c$. We find ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{i}=1.03{c}_{\ensuremath{-}0.25c}^{+0.49c}$, or that ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{i}\ensuremath{\approx}168{\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{g}$, clearly demonstrating that the speed of information cannot be generally described by ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{g}$, but is characterized by its own velocity.

Physical Review LettersFeb 9, 200564 citations

Causality and information transfer in simultaneously slow- and fast-light media

Jon D. Swaim, Ryan T. Glasser

We demonstrate the simultaneous propagation of slow- and fast-light optical pulses in a four-wave mixing scheme using warm potassium vapor. We show that when the system is tuned such that the input probe pulses exhibit slow-light group velocities and the generated pulses propagate with negative group velocities, the information velocity in the medium is nonetheless constrained to propagate at, or less than, c. These results demonstrate that the transfer and copying of information on optical pulses to those with negative group velocities obeys information causality, in a manner that is reminiscent of a classical version of the no-cloning theorem. Additionally, these results support the fundamental concept that points of non-analyticity on optical pulses correspond to carriers of new information.We demonstrate the simultaneous propagation of slow- and fast-light optical pulses in a four-wave mixing scheme using warm potassium vapor. We show that when the system is tuned such that the input probe pulses exhibit slow-light group velocities and the generated pulses propagate with negative group velocities, the information velocity in the medium is nonetheless constrained to propagate at, or less than, c. These results demonstrate that the transfer and copying of information on optical pulses to those with negative group velocities obeys information causality, in a manner that is reminiscent of a classical version of the no-cloning theorem. Additionally, these results support the fundamental concept that points of non-analyticity on optical pulses correspond to carriers of new information.

arXiv:1709.09244Optics ExpressSep 26, 20177 citations

Propagation of ultrashort optical pulses

George L. Lamb

Physics Letters AAug 1, 196781 citations

Influence of finite bandwidth on the propagation of information in fast- and slow-light media

Heisuke Amano, Makoto Tomita

We examined the propagation of information encoded as nonanalytical points on temporally Gaussian-shaped optical pulses in fast- and slow-light systems. The bandwidth of the input pulses determined the sharpness of the nonanalytical points. A sharp bending nonanalytical point propagated with luminal velocity in both fast- and slow-light systems, in good agreement with relativistic causality. As the bandwidth was reduced, the bending point became broad and propagated with the relevant group velocities. This transition was, however, qualitatively different in the fast- and slow-light systems. We also examined the predictability of the future pulse shape beyond the practical nonanalytical point on the basis of the expansion. When the bandwidth was reduced below a critical value, the expansion well predicted the future pulse shape.We examined the propagation of information encoded as nonanalytical points on temporally Gaussian-shaped optical pulses in fast- and slow-light systems. The bandwidth of the input pulses determined the sharpness of the nonanalytical points. A sharp bending nonanalytical point propagated with luminal velocity in both fast- and slow-light systems, in good agreement with relativistic causality. As the bandwidth was reduced, the bending point became broad and propagated with the relevant group velocities. This transition was, however, qualitatively different in the fast- and slow-light systems. We also examined the predictability of the future pulse shape beyond the practical nonanalytical point on the basis of the expansion. When the bandwidth was reduced below a critical value, the expansion well predicted the future pulse shape.

Physical Review AJun 28, 20165 citations

c

. On the other hand, several authors suggest that ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{i}=c$, although the size of the signal traveling at this velocity may be small, thereby making it difficult to measure. Here, we measure ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{i}$ for pulses propagating through a resonant ``slow-light'' medium where ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{g}\ensuremath{\approx}0.006c$. We find ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{i}=1.03{c}_{\ensuremath{-}0.25c}^{+0.49c}$, or that ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{i}\ensuremath{\approx}168{\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{g}$, clearly demonstrating that the speed of information cannot be generally described by ${\ensuremath{\upsilon}}_{g}$, but is characterized by its own velocity.