Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Chinese Science Bulletin

A time sequence protocol to achieve the effect of fair exchange without trusted third party

He Du, Jian Wang, Yanan Liu

Published Jan 14, 2014• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s11434-013-0075-7

Related papers

A time sequence protocol to achieve the effect of fair exchange without trusted third party

He, Du, Jian JIAN +3 more

一个公平交换协议允许二个聚会以一个公平方法交换项目,以便也两个聚会获得其它条款或两个都不聚会。在这份报纸,我们为没有信任第三方(TTP ) ,交换参加者保证建议一个时间顺序协议。然后,每个参加者能代表它的对手签署代理签名。由于代理签名限制,计划完成数字签名的公平交换的需要的效果。我们的计划基于一时间没有 TTP 的使用,顺序而非计算,和罐头被认识到,因此不同于存在公平交换计划。与并发的签名相比,建议计划不需要释放一个重点当他们相当交换信息时,弄醒签名。起始的聚会的唯一的优点是它有权利决定交换保证是否在一指明的时间前是有效的。因为代理签名的性质,然而,起始的聚会最终不从这个优点导出利益。在指明的时间以后,没有另外的优点有益于起始的聚会。

中国科学通报:英文版•Jan 1, 2014•1 citation

Fair Exchange of Short Signatures without Trusted Third Party

Philippe Camacho

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2013•12 citations

Fair Exchange of Digital Signatures with Offline Trusted Third Party

Chuan-Kun Wu, Vijay Varadharajan

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2001•6 citations

An Optimistic Multi-party Fair Exchange Protocol with Reduced Trust Requirements

Nicolás Gonzaléz-Deleito, Olivier Markowitch

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2002•26 citations

Efficient and practical fair exchange protocols with off-line TTP

Feng Bao, Robert Huijie Deng, Wenbo Mao

We present protocols for fair exchange of electronic data (digital signatures, payment and confidential data) between two parties A and B. Novel properties of the proposed protocols include: 1) offline trusted third party (TTP), i.e., TTP does not take part in the exchange unless one of the parties behaves improperly; 2) only three message exchanges are required in the normal situation; 3) true fair exchange, i.e., either A and B obtain each other's data or no party receives anything useful; no loss can be incurred to a party no matter how maliciously the other party behaves during the exchange. This last property is in contrast to previously proposed protocols with offline TTP ([1] and [21]), where a misbehaving party may get another party's data while refusing to send his document to the other party, and the TTP can provide affidavits attesting to what happened during the exchange. To our knowledge, the protocols presented here are the first exchange protocols which use offline TTP and at the same time guarantee true fair exchange of digital messages. We introduce a novel cryptographic primitive, called the Certificate of Encrypted Message Being a Signature (CEMBS), as the basic building block of the fair exchange protocols. It is used to prove that an encrypted message is a certain party's signature on a public file, without revealing the signature. We also give two examples to show in detail how the certificate can be constructed.

IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P)•Nov 27, 2002•295 citations

Fair Exchange Protocol with Distributed Semi-trusted Third Party

Futai Zhang

The techniques of verifiable secret sharing and verifiable encryption are used in the construction of two party fair exchange protocols.The novelty of the construction lies in the introduction of the distributed semi-trusted third party.Compared to the previous fair exchange protocols with a single semi-trusted third party,the newly constructed fair exchange protocol can further guarantee the security and fairness of the transaction due to the existence of the distributed semi-trusted third party.

Jisuanji gongcheng•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations
一个公平交换协议允许二个聚会以一个公平方法交换项目,以便也两个聚会获得其它条款或两个都不聚会。在这份报纸,我们为没有信任第三方(TTP ) ,交换参加者保证建议一个时间顺序协议。然后,每个参加者能代表它的对手签署代理签名。由于代理签名限制,计划完成数字签名的公平交换的需要的效果。我们的计划基于一时间没有 TTP 的使用,顺序而非计算,和罐头被认识到,因此不同于存在公平交换计划。与并发的签名相比,建议计划不需要释放一个重点当他们相当交换信息时,弄醒签名。起始的聚会的唯一的优点是它有权利决定交换保证是否在一指明的时间前是有效的。因为代理签名的性质,然而,起始的聚会最终不从这个优点导出利益。在指明的时间以后,没有另外的优点有益于起始的聚会。
We present protocols for fair exchange of electronic data (digital signatures, payment and confidential data) between two parties A and B. Novel properties of the proposed protocols include: 1) offline trusted third party (TTP), i.e., TTP does not take part in the exchange unless one of the parties behaves improperly; 2) only three message exchanges are required in the normal situation; 3) true fair exchange, i.e., either A and B obtain each other's data or no party receives anything useful; no loss can be incurred to a party no matter how maliciously the other party behaves during the exchange. This last property is in contrast to previously proposed protocols with offline TTP ([1] and [21]), where a misbehaving party may get another party's data while refusing to send his document to the other party, and the TTP can provide affidavits attesting to what happened during the exchange. To our knowledge, the protocols presented here are the first exchange protocols which use offline TTP and at the same time guarantee true fair exchange of digital messages. We introduce a novel cryptographic primitive, called the Certificate of Encrypted Message Being a Signature (CEMBS), as the basic building block of the fair exchange protocols. It is used to prove that an encrypted message is a certain party's signature on a public file, without revealing the signature. We also give two examples to show in detail how the certificate can be constructed.
The techniques of verifiable secret sharing and verifiable encryption are used in the construction of two party fair exchange protocols.The novelty of the construction lies in the introduction of the distributed semi-trusted third party.Compared to the previous fair exchange protocols with a single semi-trusted third party,the newly constructed fair exchange protocol can further guarantee the security and fairness of the transaction due to the existence of the distributed semi-trusted third party.