Abstract-The report reviews the author's early work on the precognition of quantum processes, including changes introduced as safeguards against errors.
This paper deals with the version of Jung's synchronicity in which correlation between mental processes of two different persons takes place not just in the case when at a certain moment of time the subjects are located at a distance from each other, but also in the case when both persons are alternately (and sequentially, one after the other) located in the same point of space. In this case, a certain period of time lapses between manifestation of mental process in one person and manifestation of mental process in the other person. Transmission of information from one person to the other via classical communication channel is ruled out. The author proposes a hypothesis, whereby such manifestation of synchronicity may become possible thanks to existence of quantum entanglement between the past and the future within the light cone. This hypothesis is based on the latest perception of the nature of quantum vacuum
This paper deals with the version of Jung's synchronicity in which correlation between mental processes of two different persons takes place not just in the case when at a certain moment of time the subjects are located at a distance from each other, but also in the case when both persons are alternately (and sequentially, one after the other) located in the same point of space. In this case, a certain period of time lapses between manifestation of mental process in one person and manifestation of mental process in the other person. Transmission of information from one person to the other via classical communication channel is ruled out. The author proposes a hypothesis, whereby such manifestation of synchronicity may become possible thanks to existence of quantum entanglement between the past and the future within the light cone. This hypothesis is based on the latest perception of the nature of quantum vacuum
In two precognition experiments, the subjects were faced with four colored lamps which were lit in random sequence.Their objective was to guess which of the four lamps would light up next and to press the corresponding button.In the first experiment, there were three subjects, who carried out a total of 63,066 trials.Their combined results were highly significant (p < 2 x 10 -9 ).In the second experiment, two of the same subjects plus a third had their choice of trying to predict, as before, which lamp would light up next (to try for high score) or to choose one which would not light next (low score).In a total of 20,000 trials, the subjects were again successful in achieving their aim to a highly significant extent (p < 10 -10 ).For providing the random target sequence, use was made of single quantum processes which may represent nature's most elementary source of randomness.A practical advantage of the device is that it works fast and that the randomness can be easily computer tested.The author is a physicist who is particularly interested in statistical physics and the foundations of quantum theory.After teaching at universities in Germany, Canada, and the U.S. he has joined Boeing Scientific Research Laboratories.---[Original]Ed.