Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

New Journal of Physics

Reply to Comment on ‘Evidence of slow-light effects from rotary drag of structured beams’

Emma Wisniewski‐Barker, Graham M. Gibson, Sonja Franke‐Arnold, Zhimin Shi, Robert W. Boyd, Miles J. Padgett

Published Mar 28, 2014• 3 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The phenomenon of self-pumped slow light, where a single beam appears to be slowed by a solid-state media, is both subtle and controversial. Here, we reply to a comment on our recent work, which uses an observation of enhanced photon drag to distinguish between group delay and pulse reshaping.
DOI
10.1088/1367-2630/16/3/038002

Related papers

Comment on "Rotary Photon Drag Enhanced by a Slow-Light Medium [1]"

Adrian C. Selden

The observations reported by Franke-Arnold et al (SCIENCE Reports, 1 July 2011 p. 65) do not provide evidence of slow light enhanced rotary photon drag as claimed, but arise from well-known saturable absorption phenomena consistent with the use of a spectrally broad light source, as described in their theoretical analysis (supporting online material)

arXiv:1201.3226•Jan 16, 2012•0 citations

Evidence of slow-light effects from rotary drag of structured beams

Emma Wisniewski‐Barker, Graham M. Gibson, Sonja Franke‐Arnold +3 more

Self-pumped slow light, typically observed within laser gain media, is created by an intense pump field. By observing the rotation of a structured laser beam upon transmission through a spinning ruby window, we show that the slowing effect applies equally to both the dark and bright regions of the incident beam. This result is incompatible with slow-light models based on simple pulse-reshaping arising from optical bleaching. Instead, the slow-light effect arises from the long upper-state lifetime of the ruby and a saturation of the absorption, from which the Kramers–Kronig relation gives a highly dispersive phase index and a correspondingly high group index.

New Journal of Physics•Aug 8, 2013•16 citations

Slow Darkness and Rotary Photon Drag

Emma Wisniewski‐Barker, Graham M. Gibson, Sonja Franke‐Arnold +2 more

We observe rotary photon drag significantly enhanced in magnitude by slow-light methods. Specifically, we observe the angular displacement of an image-carrying beam as it passes trough a spinning self-pumped ruby rod. We observe that both the dark and bright regions of the beam are dragged by similar amounts, showing that the slow-light effect extends to slow-darkness too.

Frontiers in Optics•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

“Slow Light” in stimulated Brillouin scattering: on the influence of the spectral width of pump radiation on the group index: Reply

Valeri I. Kovalev, N. E. Kotova, Robert G. Harrison

We show that the claims in the Comment arise from widespread misconceptions of the principles of both SBS and "slow light" phenomena.

Optics Express•Jan 14, 2010•3 citations

Slow Light: Underlying Controversies

Valerii S Zapasskii, G. G. Kozlov, Evgenii B. Aleksandrov

We show that some experimental observations on ‘slow’ and ‘fast’ light can be interpreted in terms of simple models of classical nonlinear optics without attracting the idea of steep-dispersion-based modification of group velocity of light.

•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

Comment on ‘Evidence of slow-light effects from rotary drag of structured beams’

G. G. Kozlov, S. V. Poltavtsev, I. I. Ryzhov +1 more

The paper Wisniewski-Barker E et al (2013 New J. Phys. 15 083020) is intended to distinguish experimentally between two mechanisms of pulse delay in ruby and to provide evidence in favor of the slow-light model. The proposed test is based on the idea of monitoring time delay of a ‘dark pulse’ or ‘intensity null’, rather than that of some Gaussian-like pulse. We show that, because of certain experimental inconsistencies, the results of the measurements do not allow one to prefer one of the models and, thus, are interpreted inadequately. In this comment, we propose and realize a simple modification of the experiment Wisniewski-Barker E et al (2013 New J. Phys. 15 083020), which allows us to unambiguously resolve this dilemma. We show that the effect of pulse delay in ruby is perfectly described by the simple model of pulse reshaping and does not require invoking the coherent population oscillation-based slow-light effects.

New Journal of Physics•Mar 28, 2014•6 citations
Self-pumped slow light, typically observed within laser gain media, is created by an intense pump field. By observing the rotation of a structured laser beam upon transmission through a spinning ruby window, we show that the slowing effect applies equally to both the dark and bright regions of the incident beam. This result is incompatible with slow-light models based on simple pulse-reshaping arising from optical bleaching. Instead, the slow-light effect arises from the long upper-state lifetime of the ruby and a saturation of the absorption, from which the Kramers–Kronig relation gives a highly dispersive phase index and a correspondingly high group index.
The paper Wisniewski-Barker E et al (2013 New J. Phys. 15 083020) is intended to distinguish experimentally between two mechanisms of pulse delay in ruby and to provide evidence in favor of the slow-light model. The proposed test is based on the idea of monitoring time delay of a ‘dark pulse’ or ‘intensity null’, rather than that of some Gaussian-like pulse. We show that, because of certain experimental inconsistencies, the results of the measurements do not allow one to prefer one of the models and, thus, are interpreted inadequately. In this comment, we propose and realize a simple modification of the experiment Wisniewski-Barker E et al (2013 New J. Phys. 15 083020), which allows us to unambiguously resolve this dilemma. We show that the effect of pulse delay in ruby is perfectly described by the simple model of pulse reshaping and does not require invoking the coherent population oscillation-based slow-light effects.