Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Quantum chaos, algorithmic paradigm and irreversibility

Farhad H. M. Faisal

Published Apr 7, 2008• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bfb0105338

Related papers

Chaos and quantum irreversibility

Roberto Roncaglia, Luca Bonci, Paolo Grigolini A +1 more

Journal of Statistical Physics•Jul 1, 1992•3 citations

Irreversibility and chaos in quantum systems

Giulio Casati

Lecture notes in mathematics•Jan 1, 1984•2 citations

Quantum irreversibility of quasistatic protocols for finite-size quantized systems

Yehoshua Winsten, Doron Cohen

Quantum mechanically, a driving process is expected to be reversible in the quasistatic limit, also known as the adiabatic theorem. This statement stands in opposition to classical mechanics, where a mix of regular and chaotic dynamics implies irreversibility. A paradigm for demonstrating the signatures of chaos in quantum irreversibility is a sweep process whose objective is to transfer condensed bosons from a source orbital. We show that such a protocol is dominated by an interplay of adiabatic-shuttling and chaos-assisted depletion processes. The latter is implied by interaction terms that spoil the Bogoliubov integrability of the Hamiltonian. As the sweep rate is lowered, a crossover to a regime that is dominated by quantum fluctuations is encountered, featuring a breakdown of quantum-to-classical correspondence. The major aspects of this picture are not captured by the common two-orbital approximation, which implies failure of the familiar many-body Landau-Zener paradigm.

arXiv:2212.05512•Physical Review A•May 5, 2023•3 citations

From Quantum Chaos to Irreversibility

Mikito Toda

New ideas are presented which relate dynamical features of quantum systems corresponding to chaos (so called “quantum chaos”) with the origin of irreversibility. They are based on studying topological defects of phase in the Husimi representation. Dynamical process leading to random phase is found in “quantum chaos”. The role of this for the origin of irreversibility is discussed from the following two points: (i) phase retrieval problem; (ii) entanglement of phase defects.

Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement•May 16, 2013•0 citations

Quantum chaos and quantum computing

Giuliano Benenti

•Sep 12, 2006•0 citations

From Quantum Chaos to Irreversibility

Mikito Toda

New ideas are presented which relate dynamical features of quantum systems corresponding to chaos (so called “quantum chaos”) with the origin of irreversibility. They are based on studying topological defects of phase in the Husimi representation. Dynamical process leading to random phase is found in “quantum chaos”. The role of this for the origin of irreversibility is discussed from the following two points: (i) phase retrieval problem; (ii) entanglement of phase defects.

Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement•Jan 1, 1994•1 citation
Quantum mechanically, a driving process is expected to be reversible in the quasistatic limit, also known as the adiabatic theorem. This statement stands in opposition to classical mechanics, where a mix of regular and chaotic dynamics implies irreversibility. A paradigm for demonstrating the signatures of chaos in quantum irreversibility is a sweep process whose objective is to transfer condensed bosons from a source orbital. We show that such a protocol is dominated by an interplay of adiabatic-shuttling and chaos-assisted depletion processes. The latter is implied by interaction terms that spoil the Bogoliubov integrability of the Hamiltonian. As the sweep rate is lowered, a crossover to a regime that is dominated by quantum fluctuations is encountered, featuring a breakdown of quantum-to-classical correspondence. The major aspects of this picture are not captured by the common two-orbital approximation, which implies failure of the familiar many-body Landau-Zener paradigm.