Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Fortschritte der Physik

Discrete Bose‐Einstein systems in a box with low adiabatic invariant

Valentin I. Vlad, N. I. Ionescu-Pallas

Published Apr 24, 2003• 3 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract The Bose‐Einstein energy spectrum of an ideal quantum gas confined in a box is discrete and strongly dependent on the box geometry and temperature, for low product of the atomic mass number, Aat and the adiabatic invariant, TV2/3, i.e. on γ = Aat TV2/3. Even within the approximation of non‐interacting particles in the gas, the calculation of the thermodynamic properties of Bose‐Einstein systems turns out to be a difficult mathematical problem. The present study compares the total number of particles, the total energy and the specific heat obtained by sums over the discrete states to the results of the approximate integrals (for defined values of γ) and shows the noticeable errors of the last ones at low adiabatic invariant (around condensation). Then, more rigorous and precise analytical approximations of sums are found in the case of finite number of atoms (correlated with the existence of a zero energy level) and the finite volume of the gas. The corrected thermodynamic functions depend on γ (for fixed fugacity). The condensation temperature is corrected also in order to describe more accurately the discrete Bose‐Einstein systems. Under these circumstances, the analysis of the specific heat leads to the conclusion that it shows no discontinuity, for the entire range of γ values.

DOI
10.1002/prop.200310069

Related papers

Bose-Einstein statistics for a finite number of particles

Pedro Pessoa

This paper presents a study of the grand canonical Bose-Einstein (BE) statistics for a finite number of particles in an arbitrary quantum system. The thermodynamical quantities that identify BE condensation---namely, the fraction of particles in the ground state and the specific heat---are calculated here exactly in terms of temperature and fugacity. These calculations are complemented by a numerical calculation of fugacity in terms of the number of particles, without taking the thermodynamic limit. The main advantage of this approach is that it does not rely on approximations made in the vicinity of the usually defined critical temperature, rather it makes calculations with arbitrary precision possible, irrespective of temperature. Graphs for the calculated thermodynamical quantities are presented in comparison to the results previously obtained in the thermodynamic limit. In particular, it is observed that for the gas trapped in a three-dimensional box, the derivative of specific heat reaches smaller values than what was expected in the thermodynamic limit---here, this result is also verified with analytical calculations. This is an important result for understanding the role of the thermodynamic limit in phase transitions and makes possible to further study BE statistics without relying neither on the thermodynamic limit nor on approximations near critical temperature.

arXiv:2110.02890•Physical Review A•Oct 25, 2021•4 citations

On the Bose-Einstein condensation

S.R. DE GROOT, G.J. Hooyman, Cornelis A. Ten Seldam

Abstract The Bose-Einstein condensation of a gas is investigated. Starting from the well-known formulae for Bose statistics, the problem has been generalized to include a variety of potential fields in which the particles of the gas move, and the number w of dimensions has not been restricted to three. The energy levels are taken to be εi≡εs1,....,s10=constanth2ms1α−1a12+...+swαaw2(1≤α≤2) the quantum numbers being s1 ,w= 1, 2, ..., and a1, ..., aw being certain characteristic lengths. (For α = 2, the potential field is that of the w-dimensional rectangular box; for α = 1, we obtain the w-dimensional harmonic oscillator field.) A direct rigorous method is used similar to that proposed by Fowler & Jones (1938). It is shown that the number q = w/α determines the appearance of an Einstein transition temperature T0·For q≤ 1 there is no such point, while for q > 1 a transition point exists. For 1 < q≤ 2, the mean energy ϵ- per particle and the specific heat dϵ-/dT are continuous at T = T0· For q > 2, the specific heat is discontinuous at T = T0, giving rise to a A λ-point. A well-defined transition point only appears for a very large (theoretically infinite) number N of particles. T0 is finite only if the quantity v = N/(a1 .... aw)2/ α¯is finite. For a rectangular box, v is equal to the mean density of the gas. If v tends to zero or infinity as N→ ∞, then T0 likewise tends to zero or infinity. In the case q > 1, and at temperatures T < T 0' there is a finite fraction N0 /N of the particles, given by N 0/N = 1-(T/T0)q, in the lowest state. London’s formula (1938 b) for the three-dimensional box is an example of this equation. Some further results are also compared with those given by London’s continuous spectrum approximation.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences•Sep 22, 1950•138 citations

The non-interacting Bose gas

C. J. Pethick, H. Smith

The topic of Bose–Einstein condensation in a uniform, non-interacting gas of bosons is treated in most textbooks on statistical mechanics. In the present chapter we discuss the properties of a non-interacting Bose gas in a trap. We shall calculate equilibrium properties of systems in a semi-classical approximation, in which the energy spectrum is treated as a continuum. For this approach to be valid the temperature must be large compared with Δ∊/ k , where Δ∊ denotes the separation between neighbouring energy levels. As is well known, at temperatures below the Bose–Einstein condensation temperature, the lowest-energy state is not properly accounted for if one simply replaces sums by integrals, and it must be included explicitly. The statistical distribution function is discussed in Sec. 2.1, as is the single-particle density of states, which is a key ingredient in the calculations of thermodynamic properties. Calculations of the transition temperature and the fraction of particles in the condensate are described in Sec. 2.2. In Sec. 2.3 the semi-classical distribution function is introduced. From this we obtain the density profile and the velocity distribution of particles, and use these to determine the shape of an anisotropic cloud after free expansion. Thermodynamic properties of Bose gases are calculated as functions of the temperature in Sec. 2.4. Finally, Sec. 2.5 treats corrections to the transition temperature due to a finite particle number.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 11, 2008•1 citation

The non-interacting Bose gas

C. J. Pethick, H. Smith

The topic of Bose–Einstein condensation in a uniform, non-interacting gas of bosons is treated in most textbooks on statistical mechanics. In the present chapter we discuss the properties of a non-interacting Bose gas in a trap. We shall calculate equilibrium properties of systems in a semi-classical approximation, in which the energy spectrum is treated as a continuum. For this approach to be valid the temperature must be large compared with Δ∈/ k , where Δ∈ denotes the separation between neighbouring energy levels. As is well known, at temperatures below the Bose–Einstein condensation temperature, the lowest energy state is not properly accounted for if one simply replaces sums by integrals, and it must be included explicitly. The statistical distribution function is discussed in Sec. 2.1, as is the single-particle density of states, which is a key ingredient in the calculations of thermo dynamic properties. Calculations of the transition temperature and the fraction of particles in the condensate are described in Sec. 2.2. In Sec. 2.3 the semi-classical distribution function is introduced, and from this we determine the density profile and the velocity distribution of particles. Thermodynamic properties of Bose gases are calculated as functions of the temperature in Sec. 2.4. The final two sections are devoted to effects not captured by the simplest version of the semi-classical approximation: corrections to the transition temperature due to a finite particle number (Sec. 2.5), and thermodynamic properties of gases in lower dimensions (Sec. 2.6).

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 29, 2001•0 citations

Ground-State Occupancy of an Ideal Bose-Einstein Gas Confined to a Finite Volume

D. L. Mills

The number of particles in the ground state has been computed as a function of temperature for an ideal Bose-Einstein gas confined to a box of finite volume by evaluating the discrete sum over states on a computer. Large deviations from London's bulk-gas result are found when the length of the box is much greater than its width for the range of dimensions investigated here. It is shown that the deviations occur because in this limit the system tends to behave like a one-dimensional system.

Physical Review•Apr 20, 1964•25 citations

Bose–Einstein Statistics

Robert H. Swendsen

The properties of the ideal Bose gas are calculated from the integral equations for the energy and the number of particles as a function of the temperature and chemical potential. It is shown that the integral equations break down below the Einstein temperature that corresponds to the transition to the low-temperature state. The lowest single-particle energy level must be treated explicitly to get the proper equations. With the inclusion of the lowest single-particle energy level, the low-temperature behavior is calculated. The occupation of the lowest level becomes comparable to the total number of particles in the system below the Einstein temperature, and equal to the total number of particles at zero temperature. A numerical solution to the properties of the Bose gas is discussed, and the detailed calculations are assigned to the problems at the end of the chapter.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Dec 10, 2019•1 citation
Abstract The Bose‐Einstein energy spectrum of an ideal quantum gas confined in a box is discrete and strongly dependent on the box geometry and temperature, for low product of the atomic mass number, Aat and the adiabatic invariant, TV2/3, i.e. on γ = Aat TV2/3. Even within the approximation of non‐interacting particles in the gas, the calculation of the thermodynamic properties of Bose‐Einstein systems turns out to be a difficult mathematical problem. The present study compares the total number of particles, the total energy and the specific heat obtained by sums over the discrete states to the results of the approximate integrals (for defined values of γ) and shows the noticeable errors of the last ones at low adiabatic invariant (around condensation). Then, more rigorous and precise analytical approximations of sums are found in the case of finite number of atoms (correlated with the existence of a zero energy level) and the finite volume of the gas. The corrected thermodynamic functions depend on γ (for fixed fugacity). The condensation temperature is corrected also in order to describe more accurately the discrete Bose‐Einstein systems. Under these circumstances, the analysis of the specific heat leads to the conclusion that it shows no discontinuity, for the entire range of γ values.
This paper presents a study of the grand canonical Bose-Einstein (BE) statistics for a finite number of particles in an arbitrary quantum system. The thermodynamical quantities that identify BE condensation---namely, the fraction of particles in the ground state and the specific heat---are calculated here exactly in terms of temperature and fugacity. These calculations are complemented by a numerical calculation of fugacity in terms of the number of particles, without taking the thermodynamic limit. The main advantage of this approach is that it does not rely on approximations made in the vicinity of the usually defined critical temperature, rather it makes calculations with arbitrary precision possible, irrespective of temperature. Graphs for the calculated thermodynamical quantities are presented in comparison to the results previously obtained in the thermodynamic limit. In particular, it is observed that for the gas trapped in a three-dimensional box, the derivative of specific heat reaches smaller values than what was expected in the thermodynamic limit---here, this result is also verified with analytical calculations. This is an important result for understanding the role of the thermodynamic limit in phase transitions and makes possible to further study BE statistics without relying neither on the thermodynamic limit nor on approximations near critical temperature.
Abstract The Bose-Einstein condensation of a gas is investigated. Starting from the well-known formulae for Bose statistics, the problem has been generalized to include a variety of potential fields in which the particles of the gas move, and the number w of dimensions has not been restricted to three. The energy levels are taken to be εi≡εs1,....,s10=constanth2ms1α−1a12+...+swαaw2(1≤α≤2) the quantum numbers being s1 ,w= 1, 2, ..., and a1, ..., aw being certain characteristic lengths. (For α = 2, the potential field is that of the w-dimensional rectangular box; for α = 1, we obtain the w-dimensional harmonic oscillator field.) A direct rigorous method is used similar to that proposed by Fowler & Jones (1938). It is shown that the number q = w/α determines the appearance of an Einstein transition temperature T0·For q≤ 1 there is no such point, while for q > 1 a transition point exists. For 1 < q≤ 2, the mean energy ϵ- per particle and the specific heat dϵ-/dT are continuous at T = T0· For q > 2, the specific heat is discontinuous at T = T0, giving rise to a A λ-point. A well-defined transition point only appears for a very large (theoretically infinite) number N of particles. T0 is finite only if the quantity v = N/(a1 .... aw)2/ α¯is finite. For a rectangular box, v is equal to the mean density of the gas. If v tends to zero or infinity as N→ ∞, then T0 likewise tends to zero or infinity. In the case q > 1, and at temperatures T < T 0' there is a finite fraction N0 /N of the particles, given by N 0/N = 1-(T/T0)q, in the lowest state. London’s formula (1938 b) for the three-dimensional box is an example of this equation. Some further results are also compared with those given by London’s continuous spectrum approximation.
The topic of Bose–Einstein condensation in a uniform, non-interacting gas of bosons is treated in most textbooks on statistical mechanics. In the present chapter we discuss the properties of a non-interacting Bose gas in a trap. We shall calculate equilibrium properties of systems in a semi-classical approximation, in which the energy spectrum is treated as a continuum. For this approach to be valid the temperature must be large compared with Δ∊/ k , where Δ∊ denotes the separation between neighbouring energy levels. As is well known, at temperatures below the Bose–Einstein condensation temperature, the lowest-energy state is not properly accounted for if one simply replaces sums by integrals, and it must be included explicitly. The statistical distribution function is discussed in Sec. 2.1, as is the single-particle density of states, which is a key ingredient in the calculations of thermodynamic properties. Calculations of the transition temperature and the fraction of particles in the condensate are described in Sec. 2.2. In Sec. 2.3 the semi-classical distribution function is introduced. From this we obtain the density profile and the velocity distribution of particles, and use these to determine the shape of an anisotropic cloud after free expansion. Thermodynamic properties of Bose gases are calculated as functions of the temperature in Sec. 2.4. Finally, Sec. 2.5 treats corrections to the transition temperature due to a finite particle number.
The topic of Bose–Einstein condensation in a uniform, non-interacting gas of bosons is treated in most textbooks on statistical mechanics. In the present chapter we discuss the properties of a non-interacting Bose gas in a trap. We shall calculate equilibrium properties of systems in a semi-classical approximation, in which the energy spectrum is treated as a continuum. For this approach to be valid the temperature must be large compared with Δ∈/ k , where Δ∈ denotes the separation between neighbouring energy levels. As is well known, at temperatures below the Bose–Einstein condensation temperature, the lowest energy state is not properly accounted for if one simply replaces sums by integrals, and it must be included explicitly. The statistical distribution function is discussed in Sec. 2.1, as is the single-particle density of states, which is a key ingredient in the calculations of thermo dynamic properties. Calculations of the transition temperature and the fraction of particles in the condensate are described in Sec. 2.2. In Sec. 2.3 the semi-classical distribution function is introduced, and from this we determine the density profile and the velocity distribution of particles. Thermodynamic properties of Bose gases are calculated as functions of the temperature in Sec. 2.4. The final two sections are devoted to effects not captured by the simplest version of the semi-classical approximation: corrections to the transition temperature due to a finite particle number (Sec. 2.5), and thermodynamic properties of gases in lower dimensions (Sec. 2.6).
The properties of the ideal Bose gas are calculated from the integral equations for the energy and the number of particles as a function of the temperature and chemical potential. It is shown that the integral equations break down below the Einstein temperature that corresponds to the transition to the low-temperature state. The lowest single-particle energy level must be treated explicitly to get the proper equations. With the inclusion of the lowest single-particle energy level, the low-temperature behavior is calculated. The occupation of the lowest level becomes comparable to the total number of particles in the system below the Einstein temperature, and equal to the total number of particles at zero temperature. A numerical solution to the properties of the Bose gas is discussed, and the detailed calculations are assigned to the problems at the end of the chapter.